The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 354–373 | Cite as

A business process improvement framework for knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial ventures

  • Mark P. Sallos
  • Esin Yoruk
  • Alexeis García-Pérez


Pushed by the transition towards the knowledge economy, as well as several other change drivers, an ever-increasing number of knowledge intensive ventures are relying on operational knowledge intensity in order to generate value. Through their interaction with their varied stakeholders—from actors within their supply chains to educational and financial institutions—knowledge intensive enterprises are increasingly becoming a key component of regional economic stability. Within their complex environment, these organisations lack the support of suitable frameworks to inform their efforts to optimise, adapt and improve their underlying business processes in order to maximise the efficiency of their performance and pursue growth ambitions. This paper examines the distinct nature of knowledge intensive entrepreneurial ventures (KIEs) and the applicability of current business process improvement (BPI) frameworks to their setting. Finally, a KIE-oriented business process improvement framework is developed through an integrative adaptation of the concepts of knowledge intensity and knowledge management to the principles of business process redesign and re-engineering reported in existing literature. The proposed framework contributes to the existing literature in the subject of BPI modelling for knowledge intensive entrepreneurial ventures by addressing a distinct set of improvement concerns that this type of organisations face at a process level.


Knowledge intensive entrepreneurship Business process improvement Business process redesign Business process re-engineering Innovation 

JEL classification

M130 O310 


  1. Adamides, E., & Karacapilidis, N. (2006). A knowledge centred framework for collaborative business process modelling. Business Process Management Journal, 12(5), 557–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adesola, S., & Baines, T. (2005). Developing and evaluating a methodology for business process improvement. Business Process Management Journal, 11(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvesson, M. (1993). Organizations as rhetoric: Knowledge-intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies, 30(6), 997–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvesson, M. (2001). Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity. Human Relations, 54(7), 863–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ates, A., & Bitici, U. (2011). Change process: A key enabler for building resilient SMEs. International Journal of Production Research, 18(15), 5601–5618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baptista Nunes, M., Annansingh, F., Wakefield, R., & Eaglestone, B. (2006). Knowledge management issues in knowledge-intensive SMEs. Journal of Documentation, 62(1), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bodas Freitas, I. M., Geuna, A., & Rossi, F. (2013). Finding the right partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university–industry interactions. Research Policy, 42(1), 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bottani, E. (2010). Profile and enablers of agile companies: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 125(2), 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brinkley, I. (2006) Defining the knowledge economy (online). 4 October 2015.
  10. Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campos, E. B., & Sanchez, M. P. S. (2003). Knowledge management in the emerging strategic business process: Information, complexity and imagination. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(2), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carayannis, E. G., Sindakis, S., & Walter, C. (2015). Business model innovation as lever of organizational sustainability. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chesbrough, W. H. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–42.Google Scholar
  15. Chesbrough, W. H. (2007). Why companies should have open business models? MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 22–28.Google Scholar
  16. Coombs, R., & Metcalfe, J. S. (2000). Organizing for innovation: Coordinating distributed innovation capabilities. In N. Foss & V. Mahnke (Eds.), Governance and entrepreneurship. Advances in economic strategy research competence (pp. 209–231). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1988). The influence of organization structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style. Journal of Management Studies, 25(3), 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Curado, C., & Bontis, N. (2006). The knowledge-based view of the firm and its theoretical precursor. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 3(4), 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dalmaris, P., Tsui, E., Hall, B., & Smith, B. (2007). A framework for the improvement of knowledge-intensive business processes. Business Process Management Journal, 13(2), 279–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Fuentes, C., & Dutrenit, G. (2012). Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit. Research Policy, 41(9), 1666–1682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ginsberg, A. (1988). Measuring and modelling changes in strategy: Theoretical foundations and empirical directions. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Groen, A. J. (2005). Knowledge intesive entrepreneurship in networks: Towards a multi-level/multi dimensional approach. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 13(01), 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gubbins, C., Corrigan, S., Garavan, T., O’Connor, C., Leahy, D., Long, D., et al. (2012). Evaluating a tacit knowledge sharing initiative: A case study. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(8), 827–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral difference. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hite, J. M. (2005). Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 113–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holsapple, C. W., & Joshi, K. D. (2002). A collaborative approach to ontology design. Communications of the ACM, 45(2), 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2008). Inter-firm relationships in global value chains: Trends in chain governance and their policy implications. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1(3), 258–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Isik, O., Mertens, W., & Van den Bergh, J. (2013). Practices of knowledge intensive process management: Quantitative insights. Business Process Management Journal, 19(3), 515–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jochem, R., Geers, D., & Heinze, P. (2011). Maturity measurement of knowledge-intensive business processes. The TQM Journal, 23(4), 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kalpic, B., & Bernus, P. (2006). Business process modelling through the knowledge management perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(3), 40–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kang, S. P. (2015). Change management: Term confusion and new classifications. Performance Improvement, 54(3), 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Käpylä, J., Laihonen, H., Lönnqvist, A., & Carlucci, D. (2011). Knowledge-intensity as an organisational characteristic. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9(4), 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kärreman, D. (2010). The power of knowledge: Learning from “Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firm”. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1405–1416.Google Scholar
  35. Khan, Z., Bali, R., & Wickramasinghe, N. (2007). Developing a BPI framework and PAM for SMEs. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(3), 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.Google Scholar
  37. Madsen, H., Neergaard, H., & Ulhoi, J. P. (2003). Knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship and human capital. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(4), 426–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malerba, F. (2010). Knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship and innovation systems in Europe. In F. Malerba (Ed.), Knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship and innovation systems. Oxon: Evidence from Europe.Google Scholar
  39. Malerba, F., & McKelvey, M. (2016). Conceptualizing knowledge intensive entrepreneurship: Definition and model. In F. Malerba, Y. Caloghirou, M. McKelvey, & S. Radosevic (Eds.), Dynamics of knowledge intensive entrepreneurship (pp. 19–47). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Marajanovic, O., & Freeze, R. (2012). Knowledge-intensive business process: Deriving a sustainable competitive advantage through business process management and knowledge management integration. Knowledge and Process Management, 19(4), 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moreno, A. M., & Casillas, J. C. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and growth of SMES: A causal model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 507–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Muller, E., & Doloreux, D. (2009). What we should know about knowledge-intensive business services. Technology in Society, 31(1), 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Muller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: The role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 30(9), 1501–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–266.Google Scholar
  46. Nummela, N., Puumalainen, K., & Saarenketo, S. (2005). International growth orientation of knowledge-intensive SMES. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Papavassiliou, G., & Mentzas, G. (2003). Knowledge modelling in weakly-structured business processes. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(2), 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Penrose, E. (1995). Theory of growth of the firm (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2012) SAPPHO revisited: Factors of innovation success in knowledge-intensive enterprises in Central and Eastern Europe. DRUID Working Paper 12 (11).Google Scholar
  50. Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2015). Strategies for knowledge-based entrepreneurship in Central and Eastern European economies. In F. By Malerba, Y. Caloghirou, M. McKelvey, & S. Radosevic (Eds.), Dynamics of knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship: Business strategy and public policy (pp. 327–368). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Ranjbarfard, M., Aghdasi, M., Albadvi, A., & Hassanzadeh, M. (2012). Identifying knowledge management problems using a process-based method. Business Process Management Journal, 19(2), 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rylander, A., & Peppard, J. (2005). What really is a knowledge-intensive firm. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  53. Sabau, G. L. (2010). Know, live and let live: Towards a redefinition of the knowledge-based economy—Sustainable development nexus. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1193–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Seethamraju, R., & Marjanovic, O. (2009). Role of process knowledge in business process improvement methodology: A case study. Business Process Management Journal, 15(6), 920–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Siha, S., & Saad, G. (2008). Business process improvement: Empirical assessment and extensions. Business Process Management Journal, 14(6), 778–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Starbuck, W. H. (1992). Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 713–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2008). Opportunity identification and pursuit: Does an entrepreneur’s human capital matter? Small Business Economics, 30, 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Unger, M., Leopold, H., & Mendling, J. How much flexibility is good for knowledge intensive business processes: A study of the effects of informal work practices. In 2015 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) (pp. 4990–4999). IEEE.Google Scholar
  61. van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29, 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Von Hippel, E. (1988). Sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. von Nordenflycht, A. (2010). What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Williamson, O. E. (1999). Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1087–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wolff, J., & Pett, T. (2006). Small-firm performance: Modelling the role of product and process improvements. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 268–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wright, S., Bisson, C., & Duffy, A. (2013). Competitive intelligence and information technology adoption of SMEs in Turkey: Diagnosing current performance and identifying barriers. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 2(1), 5–29.Google Scholar
  68. Yoo, K., Suh, E., & Kim, K. Y. (2007). Knowledge flow-based business process redesign: Applying a knowledge map to redesign a business process. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(3), 104–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zellner, G. (2012). Towards a framework for identifying business process redesign patterns. Business Process Management Journal, 19(4), 600–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark P. Sallos
    • 1
  • Esin Yoruk
    • 1
  • Alexeis García-Pérez
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Business in Society, Faculty of Business and LawCoventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations