Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 253–266 | Cite as

Creativity techniques to enhance knowledge transfer within global virtual teams in the context of knowledge-intensive enterprises

  • Sylvaine Castellano
  • Philippe Davidson
  • Insaf Khelladi
Article

Abstract

This conceptual paper investigates the common concern among managers that the physical separation of workers within a global virtual team may hinder the transfer of knowledge amongst the team members that is required to carry out their work efficiently, especially in the context of knowledge-intensive enterprises. Workers and work teams in knowledge-intensive enterprises are often involved in creative tasks that are carried out jointly and involve team members with diversified competencies exchanging knowledge related to their projects and assignments to create innovative outcomes. We investigate some popular creativity-enhancing techniques in the perspective of their use as catalysts for knowledge transfer in this context. We assess whether the use of these techniques may alleviate the limitations imposed on global virtual team members by their use of telecommunications and collaborative work tools that might otherwise adversely affect the effectiveness of the knowledge transfer. These techniques are designed to be used individually, by groups or within a virtual community. The physical and temporal separation of the global virtual team members does not hinder the knowledge-intensive dimension of these enterprises when aided by creativity-stimulating techniques. Therefore, we suggest that global virtual teams making use of creativity-enhancing techniques may be more efficient in transferring complex knowledge.

Keywords

Global Virtual teams Knowledge-intensive enterprises Knowledge transfer Creativity 

JEL Classification

O3 M15 F60 

References

  1. Alvesson, M. (2000). Social identity and the problem of loyalty in knowledge-intensive companies. Journal of Management Studies, 37(8), 1101–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashford, N. A., Heaton, G. R., Jr., & Priest, W. (1979). Environmental, health, and safety regulation and technological innovation. In C. T. Hill & J. M. Utterback (Eds.), Echnological innovation for a dynamic economy (pp. 161–221). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Audretsch, D., & Caiazza, R. (Forthcoming). Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: cross-national analysis. Journal of Technology Transfer. doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9441-8.
  4. Battistella, C., De Toni, A. F., & Pillon, R. (2015). Inter-organisational technology/knowledge transfer: A framework from critical literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer. doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9418-7.Google Scholar
  5. Bélanger, P. R. (2013). Notes du séminaire 9: “L’expression de la demande” (“The expression of demand”). EFA 7930—Politiques et ingénierie générale de la formation formelle et non formelle des adultes (Policies and general engineering of formal and informal adult learning). UQAM. Département d’éducation et formations spécialisées. Faculté de l’Éducation.Google Scholar
  6. Bélanger, P. R., Grant, M., & Lévesque, B. (1994). La modernisation sociale des entreprises (The social modernization of firms). Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2002). A typology of virtual teams implications for effective leadership. Group and Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergiel, J. B., Bergiel, E. B., & Balsmeier, P. W. (2008). Nature of virtual teams: A summary of their advantages and disadvantages. Management Research News, 31(2), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R. (1999). Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 439–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buzan, B., & Buzan, T. (2003). The mind map book: Radiant thinking—Major evolution in human thought (Mind Set). London: BBC Active.Google Scholar
  11. Carmel, E., Espinosa, J. A., & Dubinsky, Y. (2010). “Follow the Sun” workflow in Global Software Development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT sloan management review. . Spring, 44, 35–41.Google Scholar
  13. Clear, F., & Dickson, K. (2005). Teleworking practices in small and medium-sized firms: Management style and worker autonomy. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20(3), 218–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davidson, P. L. (2013). Why do many firms still miss the competitive advantage of virtual teams? In Proceedings of the PICMET’13 conference: technology management in the it-driven services (pp. 1697–1708). San Jose, 28th July–1st Aug.Google Scholar
  15. Davidson, P. L. (2015). Can creativity thrive within virtual teams? Novadex Ratings White Paper No. 101, April, Montreal, QC.Google Scholar
  16. Ebrahim, N. A., Ahmed, S., & Taha, Z. (2009). Virtual teams: A literature review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(3), 2653–2669.Google Scholar
  17. Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Füller, J., Bartl, M., Ernst, H., & Mühlbacher, H. (2006). Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gassmann, O., & Von Zedtwitz, M. (2003). Trends and determinants of managing virtual R&D teams. R&D Management, 33(3), 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerbin, A., & Drnovsek, M. (2015). Determinants and public policy implications of academic-industry knowledge transfer in life sciences: A review and a conceptual framework. The Journal of Technology Transfer,. doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9457-0.Google Scholar
  21. Goh, S. C. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: An integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gorman, M. E. (2002). Types of knowledge and their roles in technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(3), 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grant, M., Bélanger, P. R., & Lévesque, B. (1997). Aperçu des principales transformations des rapports de travail dans les entreprises: le cas québécois. In M. Grant, P. R. Bélanger, & B. Lévesque (Eds.), Nouvelles formes d’organisation du travail: études de cas et analyses comparatives. (New Organizational Forms of Work). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  24. Hertog, P. D. (2000). Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 491–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., & Schwinge, I. (2011). Knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship in low-tech sectors. In DRUID conference, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark, 15–17 June 2011.Google Scholar
  26. Hodgkinson, G. P., Sadler-Smith, E., Burke, L. A., Claxton, G., & Sparrow, P. R. (2009). Intuition in organizations: Implications for strategic management. Long Range Planning, 42(3), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hooge, S., & David, A. (2014). What makes an efficient theme for a creativity session? In Proceedings of the XXIst international product development management conference (IPDMC), 15–17 June Limerick, Ireland.Google Scholar
  28. Hustad, E. (2004). Knowledge networking in global organizations: the transfer of knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2004 SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research: Careers, culture, and ethics in a networked environment (pp. 55–64). ACM (April).Google Scholar
  29. Inkpen, A. C. (2008). Knowledge transfer and international joint ventures: The case of NUMMI and general motors. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C., & Wei, K. K. (2006). Conflict and performance in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 237–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kedia, B. L., & Bhagat, R. S. (1988). Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations: Implications for research in international and comparative management. Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 559–571.Google Scholar
  33. Keller, R., & Chinta, R. (1990). International technology transfer: Strategies for success. The Academy of Management Executive, 4(2), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kop, R., & Carroll, F. (2011). Cloud computing: Learning from a Massive Open Online Course on how to enhance creativity in learning. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. http://www.eurodl.org/?p=special&sp=articles&article=457. Accessed 30 July 2016.
  35. Koschatzky, K. (2002). Networking and knowledge transfer between research and industry in transition countries: Empirical evidence from the Slovenian innovation system. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kratzer, J., Leenders, R. T. A., & Van Engelen, J. M. (2005). Keeping virtual R&D teams creative. Research Technology Management, 48(2), 13–16.Google Scholar
  37. Landry, R., Amara, N., & Ouimet, M. (2007). Determinants of knowledge transfer: Evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(6), 561–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lencioni, P. (2002). The five dysfunctions of a team: A Leadership fable. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Company.Google Scholar
  39. Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual teams: Reaching across space, time, and organizations with technology. New York: Jeffrey Stamps.Google Scholar
  40. Lohikoski, P., & Haapasalo, H. (2013). Virtual competencies and knowledge transfer in global NPD: A case study. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 2(2), 185–207.Google Scholar
  41. Lovelace, R. F. (1986). Stimulating creativity through managerial intervention. R&D Management, 16(2), 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lurey, S. L., & Raisinghani, M. S. (2000). An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information & Management, 38(8), 523–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Malerba, F. (Ed.). (2010). Knowledge intensive entrepreneurship and innovation systems: Evidence from Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11(5), 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Merat, A., & Bo, D. (2013). Strategic analysis of knowledge firms: The links between knowledge management and leadership. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miesing, P., Kriger, M. P., & Slough, N. (2007). Towards a model of effective knowledge transfer within transnationals: The case of Chinese foreign invested enterprises. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(1–2), 109–122.Google Scholar
  47. Novins, P., & Armstrong, R. (1998). Choosing your spots for knowledge management. Perspectives on Business Innovation, 1, 45–54.Google Scholar
  48. Nunes, M. B., Ananasingh, F., Eaglestone, B., & Wakefield, R. (2005). Managers’ perceptions of the value of knowledge management in small and medium sized knowledge-intensive enterprise (SMEs). Journal of Knowledge Management Practice. http://www.tlainc.com/articl104.htm. Accessed 30 July 2016.
  49. Osborn, A. F. (1988). L’imagination constructive (constructive imagination). Créativité. Paris: Bordas.Google Scholar
  50. Palacios-Marqués, D., Merigó, J. M., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2015). Online social networks as an enabler of innovation in organizations. Management Decision, 53(9), 1906–1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pauleen, D. J. (2003). An inductively derived model of leader-initiated relationship building with virtual team members. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(3), 227–256.Google Scholar
  52. Pinsonneault, A., & Boisvert, M. (1999). The impacts of telecommuting on organizations and individuals: A review of literature. Cahier du GReSI, no. 99-09, Nov.Google Scholar
  53. Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: A review of current literature and direction for future research. The Database for Advances in Information Systems, 35(1), 6–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reus, T. H., Lamont, B. T., & Ellis, K. M. (2015). A darker side of knowledge transfer following international acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal. doi: 10.1002/smj.2373.Google Scholar
  55. Saunders, C., Van Slyke, C., & Vogel, D. R. (2004). My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Silverstein, D., Samuel, P., & Decarlo, N. (2009). The innovator’s toolkit: 50 + Techniques for predictable and sustainable organic growth. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  57. Simonin, B. L. (2004). An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 407–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Skyrme, D. J. (1997). The globalisation and virtualisation of knowledge. Gyosei Journal, 1(3), 71–86.Google Scholar
  59. Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J. W., & Fleming, L. (2006). Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy, 35(7), 994–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Soule, D. L., & Applegate, L. M. (2005). Beyond knowledge transfer: A typology of knowledge sharing behavior in virtual teams. In Proceedings of the European conference on organizational knowledge, learning and capabilities.Google Scholar
  61. Sveiby, K. E., & Riesling, A. (1986). Kunskapföretaget—Seklets Viktigaste Ledarutmaning?. Malmö: Liber AB.Google Scholar
  62. Tremblay, D. -G. (2003). New management forms for the knowledge economy? HRM in the context of teamwork and participation. Publication of the Teluq, Research Directorate, Research note no. 2003-14A.Google Scholar
  63. Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Warr, A., & O’Neil, E. (2005). Understanding design as a social creative process. In Proceedings—5th creativity and cognition conference (pp. 118–127). London, 12–15 Apr.Google Scholar
  65. Young, K., Sauer, S. J., & Mannix, E. A. (2006). Synergy in interdiscplinary teams. ACM meeting paper.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvaine Castellano
    • 1
  • Philippe Davidson
    • 2
  • Insaf Khelladi
    • 3
  1. 1.Paris School of Business, Chaire NewPicParisFrance
  2. 2.Novadex Ratings, Inc.MontrealCanada
  3. 3.ICN Business SchoolNancyFrance

Personalised recommendations