Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 338–353 | Cite as

Financing knowledge-intensive enterprises: evidence from CVCs in the US

  • Matteo Rossi
  • Giuseppe Festa
  • Ludovico Solima
  • Simona Popa
Article

Abstract

Since the 1990s, the importance of corporate venture capital (CVC) programs has grown around the world. CVCs are investments that established firms make in entrepreneurial companies. At the most basic level, CVC describes an equity investment made by a corporation or its investment entity in a high growth, high potential, privately held business. There is no systematic evidence that corporate venture capital investments create value for the investing firms. Firm value, however, can be created as a result of other benefits from investing (e.g., accessing a new technology). These considerations can explain why many firms currently choose to operate venture units: They have recognized the importance of CVC for strategic innovation in addition to its potential to generate financial returns. Some evidence from the US context described in this paper supports this intuition.

Keywords

Corporate venture capital Innovation Financial returns Strategic capabilities Start-ups CVC waves 

JEL Classification

M13 P12 G34 M10 M16 

Notes

Author's contribution

The article is the result of the common reflection of all the authors. In the editing phase, the “Research methodology, objectives, value, and limitations”, “CVC operations: findings”, “The waves of CVC investments”, “From the boom wave to the rethinking wave: trends and the future for the US” sections were written by Matteo Rossi the “Literature review” section was written by Giuseppe Festa the “Introduction to CVC and the presentation of the research” section was written by Ludovico Solima the “Discussion of the results, implications, and limitations” section was written by Simona Popa whereas the “Conclusion” section was written by all the authors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Allen, S. A., & Hevert, K. T. (2007). Venture capital investing by information technology companies: Did it pay? Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 262–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audretsch, D. B., & Link, A. N. (2012). Entrepreneurship and innovation: Public policy frameworks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benson, D., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2009). Corporate venture capital as a window on new technologies: Implications for the performance of corporate investors when acquiring startups. Organization Science, 20, 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BVCA. (2012). Guide to corporate venture capital. London: British Private Equity & Venture Capital Association.Google Scholar
  5. BVCA. (2015). Annual report on the performance of portfolio companies. London: British Private Equity & Venture Capital Association.Google Scholar
  6. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carayannis, E. G., Provance, M., & Grigoroudis, E. (2016). Entrepreneurship ecosystems: an agent-based simulation approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3), 631–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chemmanur, T. J., Loutskina, E., & Tian, X. (2013). Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1364213. Accessed 31 October 2015.
  9. Chesbrough, H. (2002). Making sense of corporate venture capital. Harvard Business Review, 80(3), 90–99.Google Scholar
  10. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 1–12). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chesbrough, H., & Socolof, J. S. (2002). Creating new ventures from bell lab technologies. Research Technology Management, 43(2), 13–17.Google Scholar
  12. Del Giudice, M., Carayannis, E. G., & Della Peruta, M. R. (2012). Cross-cultural knowledge management: Fostering innovation and collaboration inside the multicultural enterprise. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Del Giudice, M., Della Peruta, M. R., & Maggioni, V. (2013). The ‘right’ knowledge and spin-off processes: An empirical analysis on knowledge transfer. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(3), 304–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dushnitsky, G. (2012). Corporate venture capital in the twenty-first century: An integral part of firms’ innovation toolkit. In D. Cumming (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of venture capital. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2005). When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 26, 947–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value? Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 753–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Engel, S. J. (2011). Accelerating corporate innovation: Lessons from the venture capital model. Research Technology Management, 54(3), 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ernst, H., Witt, P., & Brachtendorf, G. (2005). Corporate venture capital as a strategy for external innovation: an exploratory empirical study. R&D Management, 35(3), 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galant, A., & Golja, T. (2015). Towards destination stewardship: Forecasting financial performance of responsible tourism on a selected croatian destination. In Bilgin, M. H., Danis, H., Demir, E., & Lau, C. K. M. (Eds.), Innovation, finance, and the economy. Proceedings of the 13th Eurasia business and economics society conference. Springer, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  20. Hébert, R. F., & Link, A. N. (2006). The entrepreneur as innovator. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), 589–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huber, G. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keil, T. (2004). Building external corporate venturing capability. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 799–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keil, T., Autio, E., & George, G. (2008a). Corporate venture capital, disembodied experimentation and capability development. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1475–1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keil, T., Maula, M., Schildt, H., & Zahra, S. A. (2008b). The effect of governance mode and relatedness of external business development activities on innovative performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(8), 895–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khemiri, F., Boujelbene, Y., & Cheikhrouhou, D. (2011). The underpricing of initial public offerings in a context of asymmetric information: An empirical study in the French context. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 3(4), 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organisational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Napp, J. J., & Minshall, T. (2011). Corporate venture capital investments for enhancing innovation: challenges and solutions. Research Technology Management, 54(2), 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Narayanan, V. K., Yang, Y., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). Corporate venturing and value creation: A review and proposed framework. Research Policy, 38(1), 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. NVCA. (2016). Year book 2016. Washington, DC: National Venture Capital Association.Google Scholar
  30. Park, H. D., & Steensma, H. K. (2012). When does corporate venture capital add value for new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramirez, R., Mukherjee, M., Vezzoli, S., & Kramer, A. M. (2015). Scenarios as a scholarly methodology to produce “interesting research”. Futures, 71, 70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rossi, M. (2015). The role of venture capital funds in financing innovation in Italy. Constraints and challenges for innovative small firms. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 7(2), 162–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rossi, M., & Meglio, O. (2013). CVC: Current trends and future directions. 2013 Aidea Conference Papers. http://www.aidea2013.it/docs/265_aidea2013_management-organization.doc. Accessed 31 October 2015.
  34. Volans and Global Corporate Venturing. (2014). Investing in breakthrough: Corporate venture capital. http://www.globalcorporateventuring.com/data/files/1568_volans_IIB_20_lo-res.pdf. Accessed 31 October 2015.
  35. Wadhwa, A., & Kotha, S. (2006). Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 819–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Waites, R., & Dies, G. (2006). Corporate research and venture capital can learn from each other. Research Technology Management, 42(2), 20–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matteo Rossi
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Festa
    • 2
  • Ludovico Solima
    • 3
  • Simona Popa
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Law Economics Management and Quantitative MethodsUniversity of SannioBeneventoItaly
  2. 2.Department of PharmacyUniversity of SalernoFiscianoItaly
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsSecond University of NaplesCapuaItaly
  4. 4.Department of Management and FinanceUniversity of MurciaEspinardoSpain

Personalised recommendations