Nanotechnology documentary standards
- 339 Downloads
This paper adds to the nascent economics literature about nanotechnology by estimating industry’s benefits and costs for the early investments in documentary standards that support the commercialization of nanotechnology, by identifying barriers to the successful development and use of the nanotechnology documentary standards, and by providing public policy recommendations to overcome the barriers.
KeywordsNanotechnology Documentary standards Innovation Barriers to technology University-industry partnerships
JEL ClassificationO320 O330 O380
For their help with Leech and Scott (2015), the report on which this paper is based, we are grateful to many individuals. We thank the respondents to the survey. Also, for their support with the process of carrying out the survey, we thank Heather Benko of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Mike Leibowitz of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), Debra Kaiser of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Vincent Caprio of the NanoBusiness Commercialization Association (NanoBCA), and Jessica Adamick of the National Nanomanufacturing Network. We also thank Ajit Jillavenkatesa, of NIST’s Standards Coordination Office, who provided guidance about the organizations and people involved in the nanotechnology standards community, and Andrew Salamon of PerkinElmer, who provided understanding about the structure and nature of the burgeoning nanotechnology industries. We thank Gary Anderson, of NIST’s Economic Analysis Office, for his questions that helped shape the analysis of the different classes of beneficiaries and Erik Puskar, of NIST’s Standards Coordination Office, who selected early stage nanotechnology documentary standards for study in Leech and Scott (2015) and then guided the project to completion.
- Foster Associates, Inc. (1978). A survey on net rates of return on innovations. Report to the National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
- Hackley, V. A., Fritts, M., Kelly, J. F., Patri, A. K., & Rawle, A. F. (2009). Enabling standards for nanomaterial characterization. In Infosim informative bulletin of the interamerican metrology system (pp. 24–29).Google Scholar
- ISO/IEC Guide 2:2004, Standardization and related activities—General vocabulary, http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=39976.
- Jillavenkatesa, A., Evans, H., & Wixon, H. (2012). Patents and intellectual property management in nanotechnology standardization: A NIST perspective. National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, presented at Symposium on Intellectual Property in Standard-Setting Processes, Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy, National Academies.Google Scholar
- Leech, D. P., & Scott, J. T. (2015). The economic impacts of early stage consensus standards development: A case study of nanotechnology documentary standards. Report to the Standards Coordination Office, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce, http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.GCR.15-1001).
- Link, A. N. (1996). Economic impact assessments: guidelines for conducting and interpreting assessment studies (NIST Planning Report 96-1).Google Scholar
- Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2011). Public goods, public gains: Calculating the social benefits of public R&D. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2012). The theory and practice of public-sector R&D economic impact analysis. NIST Planning Report #11-1. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce, http://www.nist.gov/director/planning/upload/report11-1.pdf.
- Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2013). The theory and practice of public-sector R&D economic impact analysis, chapter 2. In A. N. Link & N. S. Vonortas (Eds.), Handbook on the theory and practice of program evaluation (pp. 15–55). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- National Center for Manufacturing Sciences. (2010). 2009 Study of Nanotechnology in the U.S. Manufacturing Industry. Final Report to the National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/nano/reports/2009_ncms_Nanotechnology.pdf.
- Office of Management and Budget (OMB). (1992). Circular no. A-94: Guidelines and Discount Rates for Cost-Benefits Analyses of Federal Programs.Google Scholar
- Office of Management and Budget (OMB). (2003). Circular no. A-4: Regulatory Analysis.Google Scholar
- Robert R. Nathan and Associates, Inc. (1978) Net rates of return on innovations, Report to the National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
- Salamon, A. W., Courtney, P., & Shuttler, I. (2010). Nanotechnology and engineered nanomaterials: A primer. Waltham: PerkinElmer.Google Scholar
- Scherer, F. M., & Link, A. N. (Eds.). (2005). Essays in honor of Edwin Mansfield. Springer.Google Scholar
- Tassey, G. (2015). The economic nature of knowledge embodied in standards for technology-based industries, chapter 12. In C. Antonelli & A. N. Link (Eds.), Routledge handbook of the economics of knowledge (pp. 189–208). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar