Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Entrepreneurship research centers around the world: research orientation, knowledge transfer and performance

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work investigates entrepreneurship research centers, and analyzes their research performance. Studies on the determinants of performance of research centers have mainly focused on science and technology, while entrepreneurship has been so far neglected. Through an analysis of 46 centers worldwide, we focus on entrepreneurship research and the role of centers, by discussing how knowledge transfer mechanisms and research orientation affect research performance. Our findings contribute to shed light on the divergence of methodologies and approaches characterizing entrepreneurship research; they also corroborate the view that centers enable a “compound Matthew-effect”, according to which knowledge transfer to external stakeholders, after controlling for research orientation of the center, does foster and enrich research performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The software is available at www.harzing.com.

References

  • Albarrán, P., Crespo, J. A., Ortuño, I., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2010). A comparison of the scientific performance of the U.S. and the European Union at the Turn of the 21st century. Scientometrics, 85(1), 329–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Hülsbeck, M., & Lehman, E. E. (2012). Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 587–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Lehman, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8), 1191–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azagra-Caro, J. M., Archontakis, F., & Yegros–Yegros, A. (2007). In which regions do universities patent and publish more? Scientometrics, 70(2), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babu, A. R., & Singh, Y. P. (1998). Determinants of research productivity. Scientometrics, 43(3), 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, K., & Marsh, M. (2009). A relative impact ranking of political studies in Ireland. The Economic and Social Review, 40(3), 269–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, C., & Gray, D. (2010). The new science and engineering management: cooperative research centers as government policies, industry strategies, and organizations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, M. R., & Alon, I. (2010). An exploratory comparison of US and international academically based entrepreneurship centres. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 5(2), 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Boardman, P. C. (2003). Managing the new multipurpose, Multidiscipline University Research Centers: Institutional Innovation in the Academic Community. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Governmen.

  • Cassia, L., & Minola, T. (2012). Hyper-growth of SMEs: Toward a reconciliation of entrepreneurial orientation and strategic resources. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 18(2), 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, G., & Lyon, D. (2001). Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurship research: The past decade. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, A., & Singh, J. P. (1998). Organizational environment and performance of research groups—A typological analysis. Scientometrics, 43(3), 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coberly, B., & Gray, D. O. (2010). Cooperative research centers and faculty satisfaction: a multi-level predictive analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 547–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia, M. (2009). Research performance and bureaucracy within public research labs. Scientometrics, 79(1), 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, B., Landström, H., & Persson, O. (2006). Entrepreneurial studies: The dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 375–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, M., & Dridi, H. (2007). Intensification of university–industry relationships and its impact on academic research. Higher Education, 54(1), 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., Low, M. B., & Wright, M. (2001). Editor’s introduction: Low and MacMillan ten years on: Achievements and future directions for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. D., & Bryant, J. L. (2010). Leader-member exchange, trust, and performance in national science foundation industry/university cooperative research centers. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 511–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Massis, A., Minola, T., & Viviani, D. (2012). Entrepreneurial learning in Italian high-tech start-ups: An exploratory study. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 11(1), 94–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkle, T. A. (2005). A review of trends in the market for entrepreneurship faculty from 1989–2004. In frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 2005. In S. Zahra et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual entrepreneurship research conference. Wellesley, MA: AMBCE.

  • Finkle, T. A. (2007). A comparative analysis of US versus international entrepreneurship centers. In 21st Proceedings of the annual national United States association for small business and entrepreneurship conference, 125.

  • Finkle, T. A., Kuratko, D. F., & Goldsby, M. G. (2006). An examination of entrepreneurship centers in the United States: A national survey. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 184–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., & Wang, G. (2010). A comparative study of research performance in nanotechnology for China’s inventor–authors and their non-inventing peers. Scientometrics, 84(2), 339–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J. C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, J. C., Sehili, S., & Scarpello, V. (2010). Why do firms join cooperative R&D consortia? An integrative empirical analysis. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 494–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, D. (2008). Nordic entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(2), 313–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsbeck, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Starnecker, A. (2011). Performance of technology transfer offices in Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9243-6.

  • Hunt, J. G., & Blair, J. D. (1987). Content, process, and the Matthew effect among management academics. Journal of Management, 13, 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. (1998). The real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79(5), 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. A. (1991). The institution and infrastructure of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(3), 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. A. (2004). 2004 Survey of endowed positions in entrepreneurship and related fields in the United States. Report sponsored by the Kauffman Foundation 1–45.

  • Maclean, J., & Janagap, C. (1993). The publication productivity of international agricultural research centers. Scientometrics, 28(3), 329–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzies, T. V. (2009). University-based Entrepreneurship Centers: Frameworks for Analysis. In 23rd Proceedings of the annual national United States association for small business and entrepreneurship conference, 872.

  • Meoli, M., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2012). Completing the technology transfer process: the M&As of science-based IPOs. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-012-9416-1.

  • Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science. II. Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79, 606–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranga, L. M., Debackere, K., & Von Tunzelmann, N. (2003). Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: A case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium. Scientometrics, 58(2), 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roessner, D., Manrique, L., & Park, J. (2010). The economic impact of engineering research centers: Preliminary results of a pilot study. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 475–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruane, F. P., & Tol, R. S. J. (2007). Centres of research excellence in economics in the republic of Ireland. The Economic and Social Review, 38(3), 289–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, W. R., & Gatewood, E. J. (1991). A profile of entrepreneurship research centers: Orientations, interests, activities, and resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(3), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, X. H. (2011). Postdoctoral training, departmental prestige and scientists’ research productivity. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upton, N. (1997). Successful experiences of entrepreneurship center directors. Kansas City, MO: Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership Inc., Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, Baylor University.

  • Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermannc, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3), 425–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. J., & Tsai, S. (1983). Matthew effects in education. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F., & Lasch, F. (2008). Entrepreneurship research in Europe: Taking stock and looking forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(2), 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. K., & Singh, A. (2010). University patenting activities and their link to the quantity and quality of scientific publications. Scientometrics, 83(1), 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering, University of Bergamo, Viale Pasubio 7b, Dalmine, BG, Italy

    Lucio Cassia, Alfredo De Massis, Michele Meoli & Tommaso Minola

  2. Center for Young and Family Enterprise (CYFE), University of Bergamo, Dalmine, BG, Italy

    Lucio Cassia, Alfredo De Massis & Tommaso Minola

  3. CisAlpino Institute for Comparative Studies in Europe (CCSE), University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

    Michele Meoli

Authors
  1. Lucio Cassia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alfredo De Massis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michele Meoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tommaso Minola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommaso Minola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cassia, L., De Massis, A., Meoli, M. et al. Entrepreneurship research centers around the world: research orientation, knowledge transfer and performance. J Technol Transf 39, 376–392 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9290-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9290-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation