The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 358–375 | Cite as

Global technological collaboration network: network analysis of international co-inventions

Article

Abstract

Global innovation networks are emerging as a result of the international division of innovation processes through, among others, international technological collaborations. At the aggregate level, the creation of technological collaboration between countries can be considered as mutually beneficial (or detrimental) and their random distribution is unlikely. Consequently, the dynamics and evolution of the technological collaborations can be expected to fulfil the criteria of a complex network. To study the structure and evolution of the global technological collaboration network, we use patent-based data of international co-inventions and apply the network analysis. In addition, extending the gravity model of international technological collaboration by network measures, we show that a country’s position in the network has very strong impact on the intensity of collaboration with other countries.

Keywords

Globalisation of technology Technological collaboration Co-invention Network analysis Patent 

JEL Classification

D8 F23 O14 O30 O57 

References

  1. Archibugi, D., & Iammarino, S. (2002). The globalization of technological innovation: Definition and evidence. Review of International Political Economy, 9(1), 98–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘Sticky’ and global ‘Ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.Google Scholar
  4. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Mansfield’s missing link: The impact of knowledge spillovers on firm growth. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(2_2), 207–210.Google Scholar
  5. Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barabasi, A.-L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004). Network biology: Understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(2), 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartholomew, S. (1997). National systems of biotechnology innovation: Complex interdependence in the global system. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2), 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1990). Managing innovation in the transnational corporation. In C. Bartlett, Y. Doz, & G. Hedlund (Eds.), Managing the global firm. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Belderbos, R., Fukao, K., & Iwasa, T. (2006). Foreign and domestic R&D investment. Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.Google Scholar
  10. Bergek, A., & Bruzelius, M. (2010). Are patents with multiple inventors from different countries a good indicator of international R&D collaboration? The case of ABB. Research Policy, 39(10), 1321–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boutellier, R., Gassmann, O., & Zedtwitz, M. V. (2008). Managing global innovation: Uncovering the secrets of future competitiveness. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Knowledge networks from patent data: Methodological issues and research targets. Milano, Italy: KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Universita’ Bocconi.Google Scholar
  13. Cantwell, J., & Santangelo, G. D. (2000). Capitalism, profits and innovation in the new techno-economic paradigm. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(1), 131–157.Google Scholar
  14. Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chao-Chih, H. (2009). The use of social network analysis in knowledge diffusion research from patent data. In Paper presented at the international conference on advances in social network analysis and mining.Google Scholar
  16. Cooke, P. (2002). Regional innovation systems: General findings and some new evidence from biotechnology clusters. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dachs, B., & Pyka, A. (2010). What drives the internationalisation of innovation? Evidence from European patent data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(1), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Benedictis, L., & Tajoli, L. (2011). The world trade network. The World Economy, 34(8), 1417–1454.Google Scholar
  19. De Prato, G., & Nepelski, D. (2011). Global R&D network. Network analysis of international R&D centres. Seville, Spain: JRC-IPTS.Google Scholar
  20. De Prato, G., Nepelski, D., & Stancik, J. (2011). Internationalisation of ICT R&D. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.Google Scholar
  21. De Prato, G., Nepelski, D., Szewczyk, W., & Turlea, G. (2011). Performance of ICT R&D. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.Google Scholar
  22. de Rassenfosse, G., Dernis, H., Guellec, D., Picci, L., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2011). A corrected count of priority filings. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research Working Paper (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  23. Doz, Y. L., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. (2001). From global to metanational: How companies win in the knowledge economy. Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dunning, J. H. (1994). Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity. Research Policy, 23(1), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Edler, J., & Polt, W. (2008). International industrial R&D—policy challenges: introduction to the special issue. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(4), 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fagiolo, G., Reyes, J., & Schiavo, S. (2007). The evolution of the world trade web. Pisa, Italy: Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
  28. Florida, R. (1997). The globalization of R&D: Results of a survey of foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories in the USA. Research Policy, 26(1), 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24.Google Scholar
  31. Gassler, H., & Nones, B. (2008). Internationalisation of R&D and embeddedness: The case of Austria. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(4), 407–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2005). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257–276). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H.-J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics, 45(2), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Guellec, D., Pottelsberghe, Van., & de la Potterie, B. (2001). The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data. Research Policy, 30(8), 1253–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gulbrandsen, M., & Godoe, H. (2008). “We really don’t want to move, but…”: Identity and strategy in the internationalisation of industrial R&D. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(4), 379–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Han, Y.-J., & Park, Y. (2006). Patent network analysis of inter-industrial knowledge flows: The case of Korea between traditional and emerging industries. World Patent Information, 28(3), 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. In Paper presented at the proceedings of the national academy of sciences. Google Scholar
  38. Head, K., Mayer, T., & Ries, J. (2010). The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence. Journal of International Economics, 81(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koschützki, D., Lehmann, K. A., Peeters, L., Richter, S., Tenfelde-Podehl, D., & Zlotowski, O. (2005). Centrality indices. In U. Brandes & T. Erlebach (Eds.), Network analysis: Methodological foundations (pp. 16–61). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kretschmer, H. (2004). Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web. Scientometrics, 60(3), 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuemmerle, W. (1999). The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lai, R., D’Amour, A., Yu, A., Sun, Y., & Fleming, L. (2011). Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. Patent Inventor Database (1975–2010).Google Scholar
  43. Narula, R. (2003). Globalization and technology: Interdependence, innovation systems and industrial policy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  44. Narula, R., & Hagedoorn, J. (1999). Innovating through strategic alliances: Moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements. Technovation, 19(5), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Niosi, J., & Bellon, B. (1994). The global interdependence of national innovation systems: Evidence, limits, and implications. Technology in Society, 16(2), 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Niosi, J., Manseau, A., & Godin, B. (2000). Canada’s national system of innovation. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1991). Large firms in the production of the world’s technology: An important case of “Non-Globalisation”. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Picci, L. (2010). The internationalization of inventive activity: A gravity model using patent data. Research Policy, 39(8), 1070–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pittiglio, R., Sica, E., & Villa, S. (2009). Innovation and internationalization: the case of Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 588–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sachwald, F. (2008). Location choices within global innovation networks: The case of Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(4), 364–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schmiele, A. (2011). Drivers for international innovation activities in developed and emerging countries. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–26.Google Scholar
  52. Shapira, P., Youtie, J., & Kay, L. (2011). National innovation systems and the globalization of nanotechnology innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–18.Google Scholar
  53. Squartini, T., Fagiolo, G., & Garlaschelli, D. (2011). Rewiring world trade. Part II: A weighted network analysis. ArXiv e-prints, 1103.1243.Google Scholar
  54. Stefano, B., & Francesco, L. (2004). Knowledge networks from patent data: Methodological issues and research targets. Milano, Italy: KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Universita’ Bocconi.Google Scholar
  55. Thomson, R. (2011). The globalisation of technology acquisition. Melbourne: Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia.Google Scholar
  56. Turlea, G., Nepelski, D., De Prato, G., Simon, J.-P., Sabadash, A., Stancik, J., et al. (2011). The 2011 report on R&D in ICT in the European Union. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.Google Scholar
  57. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yoon, J., Blumer, A., & Lee, K. (2006). An algorithm for modularity analysis of directed and weighted biological networks based on edge-betweenness centrality. Bioinformatics, 22(24), 3106–3108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Union 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.JRC Institute for Prospective Technological StudiesEuropean CommissionSevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations