The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp 789–811 | Cite as

Mapping research on strategic alliances and innovation: a co-citation analysis



Using co-citation analysis, the present study attempts to rationalize and organize the combined alliance and innovation literature in order to determine its intellectual structure (i.e. its shared attributes such as models, theories, methods, findings, and implications), as well as to gain a deeper understanding of the most important research trends. More specifically, our goals are: (1) to delineate the intellectual structure of research on alliance and innovation, as represented in the academic literature; (2) to determine the subfields that constitute the intellectual structure and the relationships, if any, between these subfields; (3) to identify contributions that play a pivotal role in bridging two or more conceptual domains of research; and finally, (4) to map the intellectual structure in a two-dimensional space in order to visualize spatial distances between intellectual themes. Implications for future studies are then drawn.


Alliances Innovation management Co-citation analysis 

JEL Classification



  1. Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). The resource-based theory: Dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 621–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahuja, G. (2000a). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahuja, G. (2000b). The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 317–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aksnes, D., & Rip, A. (2009). Researcher’s perceptions of citations. Research Policy, 38, 895–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong, S., & Wilkinson, A. (2007). Processes, procedures and journal development: Past, present and future. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baum, J. A., & Ingram, P. (1998). Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Science, 44(7), 996–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bayer, A. E., Smart, J. C., & McLaughlin, G. W. (1990). Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author co-citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 444–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouty, I. (2000). Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, L. D., & Gardner, J. C. (1985). Using citation analysis to assess the impact of journals and articles on contemporary accounting research (CAR). Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 84–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chesbrough, H. W., & Teece, D. J. (1996). When is virtual virtuous? organizing for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 74(1): 65.Google Scholar
  14. Chi, T. (1994). Trading in strategic resources—necessary conditions, transaction cost problems, and choice of exchange structure. Strategic Management Journal, 15(4), 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Culnan, M. J. (1986). The intellectual development of management information systems, 1972–1982: A co-citation analysis. Management Science, 32(2), 156–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Man, A. P., & Duysters, G. (2005). Collaboration and innovation: A review of the effects of mergers, acquisitions and alliances on innovation. Technovation, 25, 1377–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DeCarolis, D. M., & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 953–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deeds, D. L., & Hill, C. W. (1996). Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dickson, P. H., & Weaver, K. M. (1997). Environmental determinants and individual-level moderators of alliance use. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 404–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dodgson, M. (1993). Learning, trust, and technological collaboration. Human Relations, 46(1), 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Doz, Y. L., Olk, P. M., & Ring, P. S. (2000). Formation processes of R&D consortia: Which path to take? Where does it lead? Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 239–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ettlie, J., & Reza, E. (1992). Organizational integration and process innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 795–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fey, C. F., & Birkinshaw, J. (2005). External sources of knowledge, governance mode, and R&D Performance. Journal of Management, 31(4), 597–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32(2), 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goes, J. B., & Park, S. H. (1997). Interorganizational links and innovation: The case of hospital services. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 673–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  30. Grant, R. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004). A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gulati, R., & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 781–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganisational modes of co-operation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, 31(4), 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002). External sources of innovative capabilities: The preference for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies, 39(2), 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harrigan, K. (1988). Joint ventures and competitive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 9(3), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hennart, J. (1991). The transaction costs theory of joint ventures—an empirical-study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United-States. Management Science, 37(4), 483–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hill, C. L., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257–274.Google Scholar
  40. Huggins, R. (2010). Forms of network resource: Knowledge access and the role of inter-firm networks. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 335–352.Google Scholar
  41. Inkpen, A., & Crossan, M. (1995). Believing is seeing—joint ventures and organization learning. Journal of Management Studies, 32(5), 595–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kahn, K. B. (1996). Interdepartmental integration: A definition with implications for product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(2), 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kleinknecht, A., & Reijnen, J. (1992). Why do firms cooperate on research-and-development—An empirical-study. Research Policy, 21(4), 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kotabe, M., & Swan, K. (1995). The role of strategic alliances in high-technology new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 16(8), 621–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kreiner, K., & Schultz, M. (1993). Informal collaboration in research-and-development—the formation of networks across organizations. Organization Studies, 14(2), 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kumar, R., & Nti, K. O. (1998). Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics: A process and outcome discrepancy model. Organization Science, 9(3), 356–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lambe, C. J., & Spekman, R. E. (1997). Alliances, external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(2), 102–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lane, P. J., Salk, J. E., & Lyles, M. A. (2001). Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1139–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Leiblein, M. J., & Miller, D. J. (2003). An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 24(9), 839–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leydesdorff, L., & Vaughan, L. (2006). Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the web environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(12), 1616–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Li, H. Y., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lorenzoni, G., & Lipparini, A. (1999). The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Madhavan, R., Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (1998). Networks in transition: How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1133–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meier, M. (2011). Knowledge management in strategic alliances: A review of empirical evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Miller, D., & Chen, M. J. (1996). Nonconformity in competitive repertoires: A sociological view of markets. Social Forces, 74(4), 1209–1234.Google Scholar
  60. Mitchell, W., & Singh, K. (1996). Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 169–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nerur, S., Rasheed, A., & Natarajan, V. (1998). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Park, S. H., & Russo, M. V. (1996). When competition eclipses cooperation: An event history analysis of joint venture failure. Management Science, 42(6), 875–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (1997). The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity, and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pennings, J. M., & Harianto, F. (1992). Technological networking and innovation implementation. Organization Science, 3(3), 356–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pierce, S. J. (1990). Disciplinary work and interdisciplinary areas: Sociology and bibliometrics. In C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 84–106). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Ponzi, L. J. (2002). The intellectual structure and interdisciplinary breadth of knowledge management: A bibliometric study of its early stage of development. Scientometrics, 55(2), 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ramos-Rodriguez, A. R., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the strategic management journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Reuer, J. J., Zollo, M., & Singh, H. (2002). Post-formation dynamics in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 23(2), 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Robertson, T. S., & Gatignon, H. (1998). Technology development mode: A transaction cost conceptualization. Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), 515–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49(6), 751–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rothaermel, F. T. (2001). Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 687–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3), 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rowlands, I. (1999). Patterns of author co-citation in information policy: Evidence of social, collaborative and cognitive structure. Scientometrics, 44(3), 533–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sakakibara, M. (1997). Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: An empirical examination of motives. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schilling, M. A., & Steensma, H. K. (2001). The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1149–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schrader, S. (1991). Informal technology-transfer between firms—cooperation through information trading. Research Policy, 20(2), 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Singh, K. (1997). The impact of technological complexity and interfirm cooperation on business survival. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 339–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sircar, S., Nerur, S. P., & Mahapatra, R. (2001). Revolution or evolution? A comparison of object-oriented and structured systems development methods. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Small, H. G. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stuart, T. E. (1998). Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3), 668–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stuart, T. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 791–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stuart, T. E. (2005). Interorganizational technology. In J. A. Baum (Ed.), The blackwell companion to organizations. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  86. Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation—implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public-policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why—An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tsai, W. P. (2002). Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vandeven, A., & Polley, D. (1992). Learning while innovating. Organization Science, 3(1), 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., & Zimmermann, E. (2002). Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology–I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Veugelers, R. (1997). Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy, 26(3), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. J. (1997). Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8(2), 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.Google Scholar
  96. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  97. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  98. Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (1994). Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis. Scientometrics, 30, 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CagliariCagliariItaly
  2. 2.Columbia Business SchoolNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations