Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 588–602 | Cite as

Innovation and internationalization: the case of Italy

  • Rosanna Pittiglio
  • Edgardo Sica
  • Stefania Villa
Article

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the impact of international activities on knowledge output. For this purpose, we employ a dataset containing exclusively qualitative information about a sample of small and medium Italian manufacturing firms. In the econometric analysis, a probit model is used. The results of the estimations highlight that firms active in international markets generate more knowledge than their counterparts which sell in the national market only. There are two possible explanations of this result. First, globally engaged firms employ more knowledge inputs, such as higher innovation expenditures. Second, international firms are more innovative because they can access to a larger flow of ideas from external sources.

Keywords

Firms’ internationalization Innovation Knowledge flows 

JEL Classification

F20 O14 O31 

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1991). R&D, firm size and innovative activity. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Innovation and technological change (pp. 39–59). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., & Feldman, M. (1994). R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 336–340. doi: 10.2307/2109888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: Evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey. Technovation, 25, 245–259. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00113-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audretsch, D. (2002). The dynamic role of small firms: Evidence from the U.S. Small Business Economics, 18, 13–40. doi: 10.1023/A:1015105222884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basile, R., Giunta, A., & Nugent, J. (2002). Foreign expansion by italian manufacturing firms in the nineties: An ordered probit analysis. Discussion Paper Series 27, Dipartimento di Economia e Statistica, Università della Calabria.Google Scholar
  6. Blalock, G., & Gertler, P. (2004). Learning from exporting revisited in a less developed setting. Journal of Development Economics, 397–416. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.06.004.
  7. Cabral, J. E. O. (1998). Survey on technological innovative behavior in the brazilian food industry. Scientometrics, 42(2), 129–169. doi: 10.1007/BF02458353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cagliano, R., Chiesa, V., & Manzini, R. (2000). Differences and similarities in managing technological collaborations in reserach, development and manufacturing: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17, 193–224. doi: 10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00021-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). ‘Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 24, 29–39. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00051-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castellani, D., & Zanfei, A. (2007). Internationalisation, innovation and productivity: How do firms differ in Italy? World Economy, 156–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.00875.x.
  11. Coe, D., & Helpman, E. (1995). International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, 39, 859–887. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(94)00100-E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1994). Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 788(2), 232–243.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, W. M., & Levin, R. C. (1989). Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In R. Schamalensee & R. D. Willig (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. 2, pp. 1059–1107).Google Scholar
  14. Criscuolo, C., J. Haskel & M. Slaughter. (2005). Global engagement and the innovation activities of firms. NBER WP no. 11479.Google Scholar
  15. Dodgson, M. (1994). Technological collaboration and innovation, the handbook of industrial innovation. Aldershot, UK: Elgar.Google Scholar
  16. Evenson, R., & Westphal, L. (1995). Technological change and technology strategy. In T. N. Srinivasan & J. Behrman (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 3), North Holland.Google Scholar
  17. Freel, M. (2000). External linkages and product innovation in small manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12, 245–266. doi: 10.1080/089856200413482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. The Bell Journal of Economics, (10), 92–116. doi: 10.2307/3003321.
  19. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.Google Scholar
  20. Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Herguera, I., & Lutz, S. (2003). The effects of subsidies to product innovation on international competition. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(5), 465–480. doi: 10.1080/1043859031000078461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767–798. doi: 10.2307/256948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kafouros, M., Buckley, P., Sharp, J., & Wang, C. (2008). The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation, 28, 63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karlsson, C., & Olsson, O. (1998). Product innovation in small and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 10, 31–46. doi: 10.1023/A:1007970416484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keeble, D., Lawson, C., Smith, H., Moore, B., & Wilkinson, F. (1998). Internationalisation processes, networking and local embeddedness in technology-intensive small firms. Small Business Economics, 11, 327–342. doi: 10.1023/A:1007942612220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S., & Aulakh, P. (2002). Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of r&d and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 79–97. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (1999). The determinants of innovation: R&D, technology transfer and networking effects. Review of Industrial Organization, 15, 43–64. doi: 10.1023/A:1007757110963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mansfield, E. (1968). The economics of technological change. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  29. Marlin, S., & Scott, J. T. (2000). The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation. Research Policy, 29, 437–447. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00084-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morone, P. & G. Testa. (2005). What makes small and medium enterprises competitive. DSEMS University of Foggia WP n. 18.Google Scholar
  31. Pack, H., & Westphal, L. (1986). Industrial strategy and technical change: Theory versus reality. Journal of Development Economics, 22, 87–128. doi: 10.1016/0304-3878(86)90053-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Piergiovanni, R., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (1997). From which source do small firms derive their innovative inputs? Some evidence from italian industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 12, 243–258. doi: 10.1023/A:1007781501147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reganati, F. (2004). I processi di internazionalizzazione delle PMI. In Le piccole e medie imprese nell’economia italiana––Rapporto 2004––Realizzato a cura dell’Istituto Guglielmo Tagliacarne Edizione FrancoAngeli––Unioncamere.Google Scholar
  34. Rivera-Batiz, L., & Romer, P. (1991). Economic integration and endogenous growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 531–556. doi: 10.2307/2937946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rogers, M. (2004). Networks, firm size and innovation. Small Business Economics, 22, 141–153. doi: 10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000014451.99047.69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71–102. doi: 10.1086/261725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rothwell, R., & Dodgson, M. (1991). External linkages and innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. R&D Management, 21, 125–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1991.tb00742.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rothwell, R., & Dodgson, M. (1994). Innovation and size of firm. In M. Dodgson & R. Rothwell (Eds.), The handbook of industrial innovation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  39. Santos, J., Doz, Y., & Williamson, P. (2004). Is your innovation process global? MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 31–37.Google Scholar
  40. Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Spence, M. (1984). Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica, 52(1), 368–402. doi: 10.2307/1911463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stock, G. N., Greis, N. P., & Fischer, W. A. (2002). Firm size and dynamic technological innovation. Technovation, 22, 537–549. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00061-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Symeonidis, G. (1996). Innovation, firm size and market structure: Schumpeterian hypotheses and some new themes. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 161, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Teece, D. (1996). Firm organisation, industrial structure and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31, 193–224. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00895-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vitali, G. (1995). Accordi tecnologici e processo di internazionalizzazione dell’industria italiana. In A. La Bella, M. Raffa, & G. Zollo (Eds.), Leve strategiche nei mercati integrati. Etas Libri.Google Scholar
  46. Wagner, J. (2006). Exports, foreign direct investment, and productivity: Evidence from german firm level data. Working Paper Series in Economics no. 25, University of Luneburg.Google Scholar
  47. Welch, L. S., & Luostarinen, R. K. (1988). Internationalization: Evolution of a concept. Journal of General Management, 14(2), 36–64.Google Scholar
  48. Westhead, P., & Storey, D. J. (1995). Links between higher education institutions and high technology firms, omega. International Journal of Management Science, 23, 345–360.Google Scholar
  49. Zeng, J. (2001). Innovative vs. imitative R&D and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 64, 499–528. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00148-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosanna Pittiglio
    • 1
  • Edgardo Sica
    • 1
  • Stefania Villa
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SEMS, Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of FoggiaFoggiaItaly
  2. 2.Birkbeck CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations