The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 169–181 | Cite as

Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations

  • E. Bacchiocchi
  • F. Montobbio


This paper estimates the process of diffusion and decay of knowledge from university, public laboratories and corporate patents in six countries and tests the differences across countries and across technological fields using data from the European Patent Office. It finds that university and public research patents are more cited relatively to companies’ patents. However these results are mainly driven by the Chemical, Drugs & Medical, and Mechanical fields and US universities. In Europe and Japan, where the great majority of patents from public research come from national agencies, there is no evidence of a superior fertility of university and public laboratory patents vis à vis corporate patents. The distribution of the citation lags shows that knowledge embedded in university and public research patents tends to diffuse more rapidly relative to corporate ones in particular in the US, Germany, France and Japan.


University patents Citations Spillovers Knowledge diffusion Public research 

JEL Classifications

O30 O33 O34 



We would like to thank Pierre Mohnen, Mariana Mazzucato and two anonymous referees for their useful comments and suggestions.


  1. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2006). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality, and direction of (public) research output, NBER Working Paper No. 11917.Google Scholar
  2. Bacchiocchi, E., & Montobbio, F. (2004). EPO vs. USPTO citation lags. CESPRI Working Paper no. 161. &id_folder=191.
  3. Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33, 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2007). The scientific productivity of academic inventors: New evidence from Italian data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caballero, R. J., & Jaffe, A. B. (1993). How high are the giant shoulders: An empirical assessment of knowledge spillover and creative destruction in a model of economic growth. In O. Blanchard & S. Fisher (Eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual (Vol. 8, pp. 15–74). MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cockburn, I., Kortum, S. & Scott Stern (2002). Are all patent examiners equal? The impact of characteristics on patent statistics and litigation outcomes. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 8980.Google Scholar
  7. Dosi, G., Llerena, P., & Sylos Labini, M. (2006). The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’. Research Policy, 35(10), 1450–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EPO. (2005). Guidelines for examination in the european patent office.
  9. Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research. The emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35(6), 790–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper 8498.Google Scholar
  11. Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 511–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M., (1996). Flow of knowledge from universities and federal laboratories: Modelling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 12671–12677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, Citations, and Innovations. A Window on the Knowledge Economy. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., McKelvey, M., & Sanditov, B. (2007). Academic patenting in Europe: New evidence from the KEINS database. Working Paper CESPRI no. 202.
  16. Lissoni, F., Sanditov, B., & Tarasconi, G. (2006). The Keins database on academic inventors: Methodology and contents, Working Paper Cespri, no.181.
  17. Mowery, D., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2004). Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mowery, D., & Sampat, B. N. (2005). The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university-industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments? Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD. (1994). The measurement of scientific and technological activities using patent data as science and technology indicators. Patent manual 1994. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  20. OECD. (2003). Turning science into business: Patenting and licensing at Public Research Organisations. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  21. Sampat, B., Mowery, D., & Ziedonis, A. (2003). Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: A re-examination. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 21, 1371–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sapsalis, E., van Pottlesberghe de la Potterie, B., & Navon, R. (2006). Academic vs. industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value. Research Policy, 35(10), 1631–1645.Google Scholar
  23. Sargossi, S., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2003). What patent data reveals about universities - The case of Belgium. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Valentin, F., & Jensen, R. L. (2007). Effects on academia-industry collaboration of extending university property rights. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32, 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MilanMilanItaly
  2. 2.University of InsubriaVareseItaly
  3. 3.CESPRI - Bocconi UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations