Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations
- 634 Downloads
This paper estimates the process of diffusion and decay of knowledge from university, public laboratories and corporate patents in six countries and tests the differences across countries and across technological fields using data from the European Patent Office. It finds that university and public research patents are more cited relatively to companies’ patents. However these results are mainly driven by the Chemical, Drugs & Medical, and Mechanical fields and US universities. In Europe and Japan, where the great majority of patents from public research come from national agencies, there is no evidence of a superior fertility of university and public laboratory patents vis à vis corporate patents. The distribution of the citation lags shows that knowledge embedded in university and public research patents tends to diffuse more rapidly relative to corporate ones in particular in the US, Germany, France and Japan.
KeywordsUniversity patents Citations Spillovers Knowledge diffusion Public research
JEL ClassificationsO30 O33 O34
We would like to thank Pierre Mohnen, Mariana Mazzucato and two anonymous referees for their useful comments and suggestions.
- Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2006). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality, and direction of (public) research output, NBER Working Paper No. 11917.Google Scholar
- Bacchiocchi, E., & Montobbio, F. (2004). EPO vs. USPTO citation lags. CESPRI Working Paper no. 161. http://www.cespri.unibocconi.it/folder.php?vedi=2031&tbn=albero &id_folder=191.
- Caballero, R. J., & Jaffe, A. B. (1993). How high are the giant shoulders: An empirical assessment of knowledge spillover and creative destruction in a model of economic growth. In O. Blanchard & S. Fisher (Eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual (Vol. 8, pp. 15–74). MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Cockburn, I., Kortum, S. & Scott Stern (2002). Are all patent examiners equal? The impact of characteristics on patent statistics and litigation outcomes. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 8980.Google Scholar
- EPO. (2005). Guidelines for examination in the european patent office. http://www.european-patent-office.org/legal/gui_lines.
- Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper 8498.Google Scholar
- Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, Citations, and Innovations. A Window on the Knowledge Economy. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., McKelvey, M., & Sanditov, B. (2007). Academic patenting in Europe: New evidence from the KEINS database. Working Paper CESPRI no. 202.http://www.cespri.unibocconi.it/folder.php?vedi=3903&tbn=albero&id_folder=191.
- Lissoni, F., Sanditov, B., & Tarasconi, G. (2006). The Keins database on academic inventors: Methodology and contents, Working Paper Cespri, no.181.http://www.cespri.unibocconi.it/folder.php?vedi=3507&tbn=albero&id_folder=191.
- Mowery, D., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2004). Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- OECD. (1994). The measurement of scientific and technological activities using patent data as science and technology indicators. Patent manual 1994. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2003). Turning science into business: Patenting and licensing at Public Research Organisations. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
- Sapsalis, E., van Pottlesberghe de la Potterie, B., & Navon, R. (2006). Academic vs. industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value. Research Policy, 35(10), 1631–1645.Google Scholar