Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 32, Issue 1–2, pp 63–85 | Cite as

Product innovation and process innovation in SOEs: evidence from the Chinese transition

  • Yuan Li
  • Yi Liu
  • Feng Ren
Article

Abstract

This paper offers an analysis of the influence of management behavior on the relationship between factors such as market, governance and resources of a firm, and the choice of the type of technological innovation in Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The authors develop a structural equation model and 12 hypotheses and test the model and hypotheses using a sample of 274 SOEs in China. This study discovers that the choice of innovation types among Chinese SOEs depends on the turbulence in the environment, and on the organizational resources. The key contributions of the study include: testing existing theories of innovation in the context of Chinese SOEs; studying the factors that affect product innovation and process innovation in that context; and demonstrating that market forces and internal governance simultaneously influence SOE innovation.

Keywords

Product innovation Process innovation State-owner enterprise China 

JEL Classifications

M1—Business administration O31—Innovation and invention: processes and incentives O32—Management of technological innovation and R&D 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Natural Science Fund of China (NNSC: 79925004, 70271026) provided financial support for this study. We thank Mingfang Li and George Farris for their insightful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Achilladelis, B., & Antonakis, N. (2001) The dynamics of technological innovation: The case of the pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 30(4), 535–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, N. J., Brahm, R., & Graham, J. L. (1992). Strategy implementation: A comparison of face-to-face negotiations in the People’s Republic of China and The United States. Strategic Management Journal, 13(6), 449–466.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, W. A., & Dowling, M. J. (1998). Explaining performance changes in newly privatized firms. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5), 601–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The rate and direction of inventive activity (pp. 609–625). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boardman, A. E., & Vining, A. R. (1989). Ownership and performance in competitive environments: A comparison of the performance of private, mixed, and state-owned enterprises. Journal of Law and Economics, 32(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Voucher privatization. Journal of Financial Economics, 35(2), 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyd, B. K., Dess, G., & Rasheed, A. (1993). Divergence between archival and perceptual measures of the environment: Causes and consequences. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 204–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking Complexity Theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative. Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, R. J., Price, D. H. R. Coates, P. D., & Pike, R. H. (1998). Organizing for innovation: Loose or tight control? Long Range Planning, 31(5), 775–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, W. M., & Levin, R. C. (1989). Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In R. Schmalensee, & R. D. Willig (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (pp. 1059–1107). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  12. Coles, J. W., McWilliams, V. B., & Sen, N. (2001). An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performance. Journal of Management, 27(1), 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, R. G. (1998). Benchmarking new product performance: Results of the best practices study. European Management Journal, 16(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daft, R. L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy Management, 21(2), 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of ‘organizational lag’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Damanpour, F. (1987). The adoption of technological, administrative and ancillary innovation: Impact of organizational factors. Journal of Management, 13(4), 675–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Mente, B. (1989). Chinese etiquette and ethics in business. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.Google Scholar
  19. DeTienne, R. D., & Koberg, C. S. (2002). The impact of environmental and organizational factors on discontinuous innovation within high-technology industries. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(4), 352–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511.Google Scholar
  21. Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), 1120–1171.Google Scholar
  22. Dougherty, D., & E. H. Bowman (1995). The effects of organizational downsizing on product innovation. California Management Review, 37(4), 28–44.Google Scholar
  23. Drew, S. A. W. (1997). From knowledge to action: The impact of benchmarking on organizational performance. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Du, J., & Yong, Z. (1998). Unchaining China’s SOEs: Interviews with ten leading economists on SOE reform. Harvard China Review, 1(1), 169–194.Google Scholar
  25. Ester, M. (2000). Explaining the decisions to carry out product and process innovation: The Spanish case. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 10(2), 223–242.Google Scholar
  26. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Education Press.Google Scholar
  27. Goldsmith, M. V. (1990). State policies and programs for encouraging innovation and technology development. In State and local initiatives on productivity. Technology, and Innovation: Enhancing a National Resource for International Competitiveness, Washington, DC: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, pp. 258–275.Google Scholar
  28. Graves, S. B. (1988). Institutional ownership and corporate R&D in the computer industry. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grenadier, S. R., & Weiss, A. M. (1997). Investment in technological innovations: An option pricing approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 44(3), 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grover, V., & Goslar, M. D. (1993). The initiation, adoption, and implementation of telecommunications technologies in U.S. organizations. Journal of Management Information System, 10(1), 141–163.Google Scholar
  31. Hansen, G. S., & Hill, C. W. L. (1991). Are institutional investors myopic? A time series study of four technology-driven industries. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  32. Hitt, M. A., Keats, B. W., & DeMarie, S. M. (1995). Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building competitive advantage and strategic flexibility in the 21st century. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Strategic Management Society, Mexico City.Google Scholar
  33. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. (1996). The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1084–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Itami, H. (1987). Mobilizing invisible assets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jefferson, G. H, & Rawski, T. G. (1994). Enterprise reform in Chinese Industry. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 47–70.Google Scholar
  37. Jelinek, M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1993). The innovation marathon: Lessons from high technology enterprises. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kao, S.-C. (1996). China’s economic reform. london: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kovenock, D., & Phillips, G. M. (1995). Capital structure and product market behavior: An examination of plant closing and investment decisions, Center for Economic Studies Discussion Paper, No. 95–4.Google Scholar
  41. Kraft, K. (1990). Are Product- and Process-Innovations Independent of Each Other? Applied Economics, 22(8), 1029–1038.Google Scholar
  42. Kynge, J. (November 13, 2000). Rising giant ‘enters the world’. Financial Times, 13(7), 25–39.Google Scholar
  43. Lenos, T. (1996). Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Levin, S. G., Levin, S. L., & Meisel, J. B. (1987). A dynamic analysis of the adoption of a new technology: The case of optical scanners. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(1), 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li, M., & Simerly, R. L. (1998). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the ownership and performance relation. Strategy Management Journal, 19(2), 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Li, Y. (1994). Research on technology innovation mechanism of enterprises. Xi’an, China: Xi’an Jiaotong University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lu, Q., & Lazonick, W. (2001). The organization of innovation in a transitional economy: Business and Government in chinese electronic publishing. Research Policy, 30(1), 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National system of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Press.Google Scholar
  49. Maddala, G. S., & Knight, P. (1967). International diffusion of technical change—A case study of the oxygen steel making process. Economic Journal, 77, 531–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maurer, B. (1999). Innovation and investment under financial constraints and product market competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17(4), 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meyer, A. D., & Goes, J. B. (1988). Organizational assimilation of innovations: A multilevel contextual analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 897–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miller D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 221–234.Google Scholar
  53. Mowery, D., & Rosenberg, N. (1979). The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy, 8(2), 102–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nair, S. K. (1995). Modeling strategic investment decision under sequential technological change. Management Science, 41(2), 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nee, V. (1992). Organizational dynamics of market transition: hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nolan, P., & Wang, X. (1999). Beyond privatization: Institutional innovation and growth in China’s large state-owned enterprises. World Development, 27(1), 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. O’Keefe, T. B., & Homer, P. M. (1987). Selecting cost-effective survey methods: Foot-in-door and prepaid monetary incentives. Journal of Business Research, 15(4), 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Phillips, G. M. (1995). Increased debt and industry product markets: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(2), 189–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  60. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  61. Qi, D., Wu, W., & Zhang, H. (2000). Shareholding structure and corporate performance of partially privatized firms: Evidence from listed Chinese companies. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 8(5), 587–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rawski, T. G. (1994). Chinese industrial reform: Accomplishments, prospects, and implications. American Economic Review, 84(2), 271–275.Google Scholar
  63. Roe, M. J. (1990). Political and legal restraints on ownership and control of public companies. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(1), 7–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Roessner J. D. (Eds.) (1988). Government innovation policy: Design implementation, evaluation. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  65. Roland, G., & Sekkat, K. (2000). Managerial career concerns, privatization and restructuring in transition economies. European Economic Review, 44(10), 1857–1872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Romijn, H., & Albaladejo, M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in Southeast England. Research Policy, 31, 1053–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rothwell, R., & Zegveld, W. (1981). Industrial innovation and public policy: Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  68. Rothwell, R., & Zegveld, W. (1988). An assessment of government innovation policies in government innovation policy. In J. D. Roessner (Eds.), Government innovation policy: Design implementation, evaluation (pp. 19–35). New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  69. Schumpeter, J. A. (1975). Capitalism, socialism and democracy, (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  70. Scott-Kemmis, D., Darling, T., & Johnston, R. (1988). Innovation for the 1990s: New challenges for the technology policy and strategy. Canberra: Department of Industry, Technology and Commerce.Google Scholar
  71. Selnes, F., Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1997). Market orientation in U.S. and scandinavian companies: A cross-cultural study. In Marketing science institute report, No. 97–107, Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.Google Scholar
  72. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shyu, J. Z., Chiu, Y-C, & Yuo, C. C. (2001). A Cross-national comparative analysis of innovation policy in the integrated circuit industry. Technology in Society, 23(2), 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Smyth, R. (2000). Should China be promoting large-scale enterprises and enterprise groups. World Development, 28(4), 721–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. C. (1985). Community, Market, State and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. In W. Streeck, & P. C. Schmitter (Eds.), Private interest government: beyond market and state (pp. 1–29). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  76. Tan, J., & Litschert, R. J. (1994). Environment–strategy relationship and its performance implications: An empirical study of Chinese electronics industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  77. Tan, J. (2001). Innovation and risk-taking in a transitional economy: A comparative study of Chinese managers and entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4), 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  79. Wegloop, P. (1995). Linking firm’s strategy and government action: Towards a resource-based perspective on innovation and technology policy. Technology in Society, 17(4), 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Xue, L. (1997). A historical perspective of China’s innovation system reform: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14(1), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Young, M. N., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Chan, E. S. (2001). The resource dependence, service and control functions of boards of directors in Hong Kong and Taiwanese firms. Asian Pacific Journal of Management, 18(2), 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anPR China
  2. 2.Department of MarketingXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anPR China

Personalised recommendations