Abstract
Public–private partnerships are a potentially important means of conducting pro-poor agricultural research in many developing countries. Yet within the international agricultural research sector, there are few examples of successful collaboration that have contributed to food security, poverty reduction or agricultural development. This study hypothesizes that partnerships between public research agencies and private, multinational firms are constrained by fundamentally different incentive structures; prohibitive costs, both direct and indirect; mutually negative perceptions between the sectors; and high levels of competition and risk associated with valuable assets and resources. Based on a survey of key stakeholders and a review of the literature, findings suggest that the primary impediments to partnership are perceptions, competition and risk, while issues of costs and conflicting incentives are secondary. These findings suggest that investment in innovative organizational mechanisms and supportive public policies could facilitate more, and more successful, public–private partnerships in pro-poor agricultural research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AVAC (AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition), 2003, ‘Legislation: Incentives proposed in the US Congress for AIDS vaccine research and delivery,’ accessed at URL: http://www.avac.org/actionLeg.htm, December 15, 2003.
G. Barry R. Horsch (2000) ‘Evolving Role of the Public and Private Sector in Agricultural Biotechnology for Developing Countries’ G.J. Persley M.M. Lantin (Eds) Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor. Proceedings of an International Conference, Washington, D.C., 21–22 Oct. 1999 CGIAR Washington, D.C. 183–185
E. Binenbaum P.G. Pardey B.D. Wright (2001) ArticleTitle‘Public–Private Research Relationships: The Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 IssueID3 748–753 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0002-9092.00202
K. Buse G. Walt (2000a) ArticleTitle‘Global Public–Private Partnerships: Part I – A New Development in Health?’ Bulletin of the World Health Organization 78 IssueID4 549–561
K. Buse G. Walt (2000b) ArticleTitle‘Global Public–Private Partnerships: Part II – What are the Health Issues for Global Governance?’ Bulletin of the World Health Organization 78 IssueID5 699–709
K. Buse A. Waxman (2001) ArticleTitle‘Public–Private Health Partnerships: A Strategy for WHO’ Bulletin of the World Health Organization 79 IssueID8 748–754
J.S. Buurma D.M. Boselie (2000) ArticleTitle‘Stakeholder Perception Analysis for Agri-Supply Chain Development’ Acta Horticulturae 536 625–633
Byerlee, D. and K. Fischer, 2001, ‘Accessing Modern Science: Policy and Institutional Options in Developing Countries,’ IP Strategy Today 1.
J.I. Cohen C. Falconi J. Komen (2000) ‘Perspectives from International Agricultural Research Centers ISNAR’ U. Lele W. Lesser G. Horstkotte-Wesseler (Eds) Intellectual Property Rights in Agriculture World Bank Washington, DC 22–28
InstitutionalAuthorNameCGIAR (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research) (1998) The International Research Partnership for Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture: Third System Review of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research CGIAR Secretariat Washington, DC
C. Correa (2000) Integrating Public Health Concerns into Patent Legislation in Developing Countries The South Center Geneva, Switzerland
De Bruijn, J.A. and H.G. van der Voort, 2002, Public–Private Partnership in Scientific Research: A Framework for Evaluation, study commissioned by the Consultative Committee of Sector Councils for Research and Development, The Netherlands.
J. Driscoll G.L. Cowger R.J. Egan (1979) ArticleTitle‘SMR Forum: Private Managers and Public Myths – Public Managers and Private Myths’ Sloan Management Review 21 IssueID1 53–57
J. Ekboir G. Parellada (2002) ‘Public–Private Interactions and Technology Policy in Innovation Processes for Zero Tillage in Argentina’ D. Byerlee R. Echeverria (Eds) Agricultural Research Policy in an Era of Privatization CABI Oxon, UK 137–154
R.A. Fredland (2000) ArticleTitle‘Technology Transfer to the Public Sector in Developing States: Three Phases’ Journal of Technology Transfer 25 IssueID3 265–275 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1007870520985
A. Guilloux S. Moon (2001) Hidden Price Tags: Disease-Specific Drug Donations: Costs and Alternatives Médecins Sans Frontières/Drugs for Neglected Diseases Working Group Paper Geneva, Switzerland
A. Hall R. Sulaiman N. Clark M.V.K. Sivamohan B. Yoganand (2002) ‘Public–Private Sector Interaction in the Indian Agricultural Research System: An Innovation Systems Perspective on Institutional Reform’ D. Byerlee R. Echeverria (Eds) Agricultural Research Policy in an Era of Privatization CABI Oxon, UK 155–176
P.B.R. Hazell L.J. Haddad (2001) Agricultural Research and Poverty Reduction International Food Policy Research Institute Washington, DC
J. Huang S. Rozelle C. Pray Q. Wang (2002) ArticleTitle‘Plant Biotechnology in China’ Science 295 IssueID5555 674–677 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1067226
IPPPH (Initiative on Public–Private Partnerships for Health), 2003, accessed at URL: http://www.ippph.org/index.cfm, December 5, 2003.
James, C.J., 1996, ‘Agricultural Research and Development: The Need for Public–Private Sector Partnerships,’ Issues in Agriculture 9., Washington, DC: CGIAR.
Leisinger, K.M., 1995, Sociopolitical Effects of New Biotechnologies in Developing Countries, Food, Agriculture and the Environment Discussion Paper No. 2, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
J. Lewis (2000) ‘Leveraging Partnerships Between the Public and the Private Sector: Experience of USAID’s Agricultural Biotechnology Programs’ G.J. Persley M.M. Lantin (Eds) Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor. CGIAR Washington, D.C. 196–199
Meinzen-Dick, R.S., A. Adato, L. Haddad, and P. Hazell, 2003, Impacts of Agricultural Research on Poverty: Findings of an Integrated Economic and Social Analysis, Environment and Production Technology Division Discussion Paper 111/Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper 164, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
P.G. Pardey N.M. Beintema (2001) Slow Magic: Agricultural R&D a Century After Mendel Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators/International Food Policy Research Institute Washington, D.C
PSC (Private Sector Committee of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research), 1999, Report of the Tenth Meeting of the CGIAR Private Sector Committee, Hattersheim, Germany, March 11–12, 1999, meeting report, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Washington, DC.
C.E. Pray (2001) ArticleTitle‘Public–Private Sector Linkages in Research and Development: Biotechnology and the Seed Industry in Brazil, China and India’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 IssueID3 742–747 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0002-9092.00201
C.E. Pray J. Huang R. Hu S. Rozelle (2002) ArticleTitle‘Five Years of Bt cotton in China – The Benefits Continue’ Plant Journal 31 IssueID4 423–430 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01401.x
Rangan, S., R. Samii, and L.N. Wassenhove, 2003, ‘Constructive Partnerships: When Alliances between Private Firms and Public Actors Can Enable Creative Strategies,’ Insead manuscript. Accessed at URL, http://62.50.65.8/index.cfm?page=/ippph/publications&thechoice=retrieve&docno=61, December 15, 2003.
P.M. Sandman P.M. Miller B.B. Johnson N.D. Weinstein (1993) ArticleTitle‘Agency Communication Community Outrage and Perception of Risk: Three Simulation Experiments’ Risk Analysis 13 IssueID6 585–598
P.M. Sandman N.D. Weinstein W.K. Hallman (1998) ArticleTitle‘Communications to Reduce Risk Underestimation and Overestimation’ Risk Decision and Policy 3 IssueID2 93–108
Shear, R.H., 2000, ‘Perspectives from Industry: Monsanto,’ in U. Lele, W. Lesser, and G. Horstkotte-Wesseler (eds.), Intellectual Property Rights in Agriculture, Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Series, Rural Development 3, Washington, D.C.: World Bank, pp. 34–37.
M. Taylor J. Cayford (2003) American Patent Policy, Biotechnology, and African Agriculture: The Case for Policy Change Resources for the Future Washington, DC
K. Van der Meer (2002) ‘Public–Private Cooperation in Agricultural Research: Examples from the Netherlands’ D. Byerlee R. Echeverria (Eds) Agricultural Research Policy in an Era of Privatization CABI Oxon, UK 123–136
G. Walt L. Lush (2001) ArticleTitleGetting Drugs to Where They are Needed: Global Public Private Partnerships for Neglected Diseases Biotechnology and Development Monitor 46 9–12
D. Webber M. Kremer (2001) ArticleTitlePerspectives on Stimulating Industrial Research and Development for Neglected Infectious Diseases Bulletin of the World Health Organization 79 IssueID8 735–741
InstitutionalAuthorNameWorld Bank (2003) The CGIAR at 31: An Independent Meta-Evaluation of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research Operations Evaluation Department, World Bank Washington, D.C
InstitutionalAuthorNameWorld Bank (2002) The World Bank’s Approach to Global Programs: An Independent Evaluation, Phase I Report Operations Evaluation Department, World Bank Washington, D.C
WEF (World Economic Forum), 2003, African Food Security: A Role for Public Private Partnership, from the World Economic Forum Africa Economic Summit 2003, June 12, 2003, accessed at URL: http:/www.weforum.org, September 29, 2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spielman, D.J., von Grebmer, K. Public–Private Partnerships in International Agricultural Research: An Analysis of Constraints. J Technol Transfer 31, 291–300 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-6112-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-6112-1