Abstract
This research derives from an EU DG Enterprise (IPS Programme) project on bio-incubation, called Bio-Link. The Bio-Link project is innovative in three ways. First, it involves an international comparative analysis of biotechnology incubators of the kind that is rarely if ever done. Second, the incubator representatives are monitored and investigated by an academic partnership team. Third, there is a stated aspiration by the incubator companies to engage in co-incubation across borders. Co-incubation is, as far as we are aware, a new kind of boundary crossing innovation in which advanced start-up businesses are assisted to enter other national markets and/or benefit from specialised services or scientific, technological, or commercial knowledge absent in the home country but present in a partner country. Evidence from research on European, Israeli and North American bioincubators is included to compare, contrast and enable future judgements of incubator appropriateness to biotechnology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson, M. and O. Ejermo, 2002, ‘Knowledge Production in Swedish Functional Regions 1993–1999,’ in paper to International Workshop on Knowledge Spillovers and Knowledge Management in Industrial Clusters and Networks, Ljungby, Sweden, 19–21 September, in C. Karlsson et al. (eds.), 2004, Knowledge Spillovers & Knowledge Management, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
D. Audretsch M. Feldman (1996) ArticleTitle‘Knowledge Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production’ American Economic Review 86 630–640
Audretsch, D., 2001, R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production, paper to International Workshop ‘Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition’ Kiel Institute of World Economics, 12–13 November, in J. Bröcker, D. Dohse, and R. Soltwedel (eds.), 2003, Innovation Clusters & Interregional Competition, Berlin: Springer.
InstitutionalAuthorNameCentre for Strategy & Evaluation Services (2003) Provision of Bioscience Incubators and Grow-on Facilities in the UK CSES London
P. Cooke (2001) ArticleTitle‘Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy’ Industrial & Corporate Change 10 945–973 Occurrence Handle10.1093/icc/10.4.945
P. Cooke (2002a) Knowledge Economies Routledge London
Cooke, P., 2002b, Regional Science Policy and the Growth of Knowledge Megacentres in Bioscience Clusters. Presented at the Regional Science Association 42nd European Congress, Dortmund, Germany, August 27–31, 2002, in Special Issue – Embeddedness & Regional Development: Guest Editors, Frans Boekema and Roel Rutten, European Planning Studies, 12(4), 2004.
Cooke, P., 2005, Rational Drug Design, the Knowledge Value Chain and Bioscience Megacentres, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28, (forthcoming)
Cooke, P., S. Roper, and P. Wylie, 2003, “The ‘Golden Thread of Innovation’ and Northern Ireland’s Evolving Regional Innovation System,” Regional Studies, 37.
D. Feldman M. Audretsch (1999) ArticleTitle‘Innovation in Cities: Science-based Diversity, Specialisation and Localised Competition’ European Economic Review 43 409–429 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6
Fritsch, M., 2001, How and Why Does Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems matter? Paper to International Workshop on ‘Innovation Clusters & Interregional Competition,’ Kiel Institute of World Economics, Kiel, Germany, 12–13 November, in J. Bröcker, D. Dohse and R. Soltwedel (eds.), 2003, Innovation Clusters & Interregional Competition, Berlin: Springer.
S. Giesecke (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Contrasting Roles of Government in the Development of Biotechnology Industry in the US and Germany’ Research Policy 29 205–223 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00061-X
M Granovetter et al. (2000) Social Networks in Silicon Valley C. Lee (Eds) et al. The Silicon Valley Edge Stanford University Press Stanford
A. Jaffe M. Trajtenberg R. Henderson (1993) ArticleTitle‘Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 577–598
R. Kaiser (2003) ArticleTitle‘Multi-level Science Policy and Regional Innovation: The Case of the Munich Cluster for Pharmaceutical Biotechnology’ European Planning Studies 11 841–858 Occurrence Handle10.1080/0965431032000121373
InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Business Incubation Association (2002) A National Benchmarking Analysis of Technology Business Incubator Performance & Practices NBIA Washington, D.C.
R. Norton (2000) Creating the New Economy: The Entrepreneur and the US Resurgence Edward Elgar Cheltenham
Owen-Smith, J., M. Riccaboni, F. Pammolli, and W. Powell, 2001, A Comparison of US and European University–Industry Relations in Life Sciences, (mimeo).
M. Porter (1998) On Competition Harvard Business School Press Boston
W. Powell K. Koput J. Bowie L. Smith-Doerr (2002) ArticleTitle‘The Spatial Clustering of Science and Capital: Accounting for Biotech firm-venture Capital Relationships’ Regional Studies 36 291–305 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00343400220122089
J. Senker P. Zwanenberg ParticleVan (2001) European Biotechnology Innovation Systems University of Sussex SPRU
K. Weick (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations Sage London
K. Wolter (2002) Can the US Experience Be Repeated? The Evolution of Biotechnology in Three European Regions, (mimeo) Duisburg University Germany
Zook, M., 2000, Grounded Capital: Venture Capital’s Role in the Clustering of Internet Firms in the US, paper to American Collegiate Schools of Planning Conference, Atlanta, November.
L. Zucker M. Darby J. Armstrong (1998) ArticleTitle‘Geographically Localised Knowledge: Spillovers or Markets?’ Economic Inquiry 36 65–86 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01696.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooke, P., Kaufmann, D., Levin, C. et al. ‘The Biosciences Knowledge Value Chain and Comparative Incubation Models’. J Technol Transfer 31, 115–129 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5025-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5025-3