Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 303–314 | Cite as

Technology Competitiveness in Emerging Markets: The Case of the Brazilian Polymer Industry

  • Carlos A. Hemais
  • Henrique M. Barros
  • Elizabeth O. R. Rosa
Article

Abstract.

The Brazilian polymer industry (plastics, rubbers, fibers, adhesives, paints, and varnishes) is the fastest growing segment of the Petrochemical Chain. Since the polymer industry is characterized as science based, the capacity to create technology is vital for its long-range survival in the market. This paper analyzes how Brazilian polymer firms maintain their technological competitiveness, explains the main modes of technology transfer, and evaluates the degree of technological dependence of this industry. The methodology consisted of a database built with data from the Brazilian Patent Office. To confirm the findings, interviews were conducted with staff members from seven Brazilian polymer firms. The data base analysis and the interviews reveal that, in spite of the fact that Research and Development (R&D) and technological innovation have a fundamental role in their competitiveness, the firms are technologically dependent upon foreign suppliers.

Keywords

competitiveness innovation polymer industry R&D technology transfer. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bean A.S. (1995). Why some R&D Organizations are More Productive than Others. Research Technology Management Jan/Feb, 25–29.Google Scholar
  2. Bodewitz, H., De Vries, G., Weeder, P. 1988Towards for Technology-oriented R&D ProcessesResearch Policy17213224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chesbrough H., Teece D.J. (1996). Organizing for Innovation. Harvard Business Review Jan/Feb, 65–73.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A. 1989Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&DThe Economic Journal99569596Google Scholar
  5. Deschamps, J.P., Nayak, R. 1997Como se Destacar na prateleiraRevista Exame46264Google Scholar
  6. Hemais, C.A. 1997Model of International Transfer of Technology: A Theoretical ApproachTechnology Management: Strategies and Applications3213227Google Scholar
  7. Kvale, S. 1996InterViews—An Introduction to Qualitative Research InterviewingSageThousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  8. Lander L., Matheson D., Menke M.M., Ransley L. (1995). Improving the R&D Decision Process. Research Technology Management Jan/Feb , 40–43.Google Scholar
  9. McCulloch, R. 1981Technology Transfer To Developing Countries: Implications of International RegulationAnnals American Academy of Political Science458(Nov)110122Google Scholar
  10. Pavitt, K. 1984Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a TheoryResearch Policy13343373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pavitt, K. 1992Some Foundations for a Theory of the Large Innovating Firm’Dosi, G.Giannetti, R.Toninelli, P.A. eds. Technology and Enterprise in a Historical PerspectiveClarendon PressOxford212228Google Scholar
  12. Sheskin, D.J. 2004Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures,’3Chapman & Hall/ CRCBoca RatonGoogle Scholar
  13. Thayer, A.M. 1995Justifying technology’s Value Challenges Industry R&D ManagersCandEN News61014Google Scholar
  14. Twiss, B. 1986Managing Technological Innovation3PitmanLondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Yin, R. 1994Case Study Research—Design and MethodsSageNewbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos A. Hemais
    • 1
  • Henrique M. Barros
    • 1
  • Elizabeth O. R. Rosa
    • 1
  1. 1.Technology Management GroupIMA/COPPEAD-UFRJRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations