Journal of Mathematical Sciences

, Volume 202, Issue 5, pp 684–702 | Cite as

Localized Solutions of a Piecewise Linear Model of the Stationary Swift–Hohenberg Equation on the Line and on the Plane



In this paper we study a simplified model of the stationary Swift–Hohenberg equation, where the cubic nonlinearity is replaced by a piecewise linear function with similar properties. The main goal is to prove the existence of so-called localized solutions of this equation, i.e., solutions decaying to a homogeneous zero state with unbounded increase of the space variable. The following two cases of the space variable are considered: one-dimensional (on the whole line) and two-dimensional; in the latter case, radially symmetric solutions are studied. The existence of such solutions and increase of their number with change in the equation parameters are shown.


Hamiltonian System Localize Solution Unstable Manifold Symmetric Solution Piecewise Linear Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. Abramowitz and E. Stegan, Guidebook in Special Functions, Nauka, Moscow (1979).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. A. Andronov, A.A. Vitt, and S.E. Haikin, Theory of Oscillations [in Russian], 2d ed., Fizmatgiz, Moscow (1959).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. Aranson, K. Gorshkov, A. Lomov, and M. Rabinovich, “Stable particle-like solutions of multidimensional nonlinear fields,” Phys. Rev. D., 43, 435–453 (1990).MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. I. Arnol’d and A.B. Givental, “Symplectic geometry,” Sovrem. Probl. Mat. Fundam. Napravl., 4, 7–178 (1985).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Beck, J. Knobloch, D. Lloyd, B. Sandstede, and Th. Wagenknecht, “Snakes, ladders, and isolas of localised patterns,” SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41, No. 3, 936–972 (2008).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Belyakov, L. Glebsky, and L. Lerman, “Abundance of stable stationary localized solutions to the generalized Swift–Hohenberg equation,” Comput. Math. Appl., 34, No. 2–4, 253–266 (1997).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Burke and E. Knobloch, “Localized states in the generalized Swift–Hohenberg equation,” Phys. Rev. E, 73, 056211 (2006).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Burke and E. Knobloch, “Multipulse states in the Swift–Hohenberg equation,” Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., suppl., 109–117 (2009).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. L. Devaney, “Homoclinic orbits in Hamiltonian systems,” J. Differ. Equ., 21, 431–439 (1976).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Doelman, B. Sandstede, A. Scheel, and G. Schneider, “Propagation of hexagonal patterns near onset,” Eur. J. Appl. Math., 14, 85–110 (2003).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. F. Hilali, S. Métens, P. Borckmans, and G. Dewel, “Pattern selection in the generalized Swift–Hohenberg model,” Phys. Rev. E., 51, 2046–2052 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Jones and N. Küpper, “On the infinitely many solutions of a semilinear elliptic equation,” SIAM J. Math. Anal., 17, No. 4, 803–835 (1986).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. E. Kulagin, L. M. Lerman, and T. G. Shmakova, “On Radial Solutions of the Swift–Hohenberg Equation,” Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 261, 183–203 (2008).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Lega, J. V. Moloney, and A. S. Newell, “Swift–Hohenberg equation for lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 2978–2981 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Lerman, “Dynamical phenomena near a saddle-focus homoclinic connection in a Hamiltonian system,” J. Stat. Phys., 101, No. 1-2, 357-372 (2000).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. Lerman and N. Slinyakova, “On the dynamics of a piecewise linear model of the Swift–Hohenberg equation,” Nelinejn. Dinam., 5, 1–15 (2009).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Lloyd and B. Sandstede, “Localized radial patterns in the Swift–Hohenberg equation,” Nonlinearity, 22, No. 2, 485–524 (2009).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. A. Peletier and J.A. Rodriguez, “Homoclinic orbits to a saddle-center in a fourth-order differential equation,” J. Differ. Equ., 203, 185–215 (2004).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Swift and P. S. Hohenberg, “Hydrodynamic fluctuations at the convective instability,” Phys. Rev. A, 15, 319–328 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Tlidi, M. Georgiou, and P. Mandel, “Transverse patterns in nascent optical bistability,” Phys. Rev., 48, 4605–4609 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Yanke, F. Emde, and F. Lesh, Special Functions: Formulas, Graphs, Tables [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1964).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State University of ManagementMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Research Institute for Applied Mathematics and CyberneticsN. I. Lobachevski State University of Nizhnii NovgorodNizhnii NovgorodRussia
  3. 3.N. I. Lobachevski State University of Nizhni Novgorod, Faculty of Mechanics and MathematicsNizhnii NovgorodRussia

Personalised recommendations