Advertisement

Journal of Mathematical Sciences

, Volume 202, Issue 1, pp 50–71 | Cite as

Solution of the Integral Geometry Problem for 2-Tensor Fields by the Singular Value Decomposition Method

  • E. Yu. Derevtsov
  • A. P. Polyakova
Article

We consider the integral geometry problem of finding a symmetric 2-tensor field in a unit disk provided that the ray transforms of this field are known. We construct singular value decompositions of the operators of longitudinal, transversal, and mixed ray transforms that are the integrals of projections of a field onto the line where they are computed. We essentially use the results on decomposition of tensor fields and their representation in terms of potentials. The singular value decompositions are constructive and can be used for creating an algorithm for recovering a tensor field from its known ray characteristics.

Keywords

Radon Unit Disk Jacobi Polynomial Continuous Linear Operator Require Assertion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. E. Davison, “A singular value decomposition for the Radon transform in n-dimensional Euclidean space,” Numer. Funct. Anal. Optimization 3, 321–340 (1981).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. K. Louis, “Orthogonal function series expansions and the null space of the Radon transform,” SIAM J. Math. Anal. 15, 621–633 (1984).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. T. Quinto, “Singular value decomposition and inversion methods for the exterior Radon transform and a spherical transform,” J. Math. Anal. Appl. 95, 437–448 (1985).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Maass, “The X-ray transform: singular value decomposition and resolution,” Inverse Probl. 3, 727–741 (1987).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. K. Louis, “Incomplete data problems in X-ray computerized tomography. I: Singular value decomposition of the limited angle transform,” Numer. Math. 48, 251–262 (1986).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Yu. Derevtsov, S. G. Kazantsev, and T. Schuster, “Polynomial bases for subspaces of vector fields in the unit ball. Method of ridge functions,” J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 15, No. 1, 1–38 (2007).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Yu. Derevtsov, A. V. Efimov, A. K. Louis, and T. Schuster, “Singular value decomposition and its application to numerical inversion for ray transforms in 2D vector tomography,” J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 19, No. 4–5, 689–715 (2011).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. G. Kazantsev and A. A. Bukhgeim, “Singular value decomposition for the 2D fan-beam radon transform of tensor fields,” J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 12, No. 4, 1–35 (2004).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. E. Kochin, Vector Calculus and Foundations of Tensor Calculus [in Russian], ONTI, Moscow etc. (1934).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Weyl, “The method of orthogonal projection in potential theory,” Duke Math. J., No. 7, 411–444 (1940).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Yu. Derevtsov, “An approach to direct reconstruction of a solenoidal part in vector and tensor tomography problems,” J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 13, No. 3–6, 213–246 (2005).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Yu. Derevtsov, “Some problems of nonscalar tomography” [in Russian] In: Proceedings of Conferences, pp. 81–111, Siberian. Elect. Math. Reports 7 (2010).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. A. Sharafutdinov, Integral Geometry for Tensor Fields [in Russian], Nauka, Novosibirsk (1993); English transl.: VSP, Utrecht (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Deans, The Radon Transform and Some of its Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1983).MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. Natterer, Mathematics of Computerized Tomography, SIAM, Philadelphia (2001).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. C. Gohberg and M. G. Krein, Introduction to the Theory of Linear Nonselfadjoint Operators in a Hilbert Space [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1965).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. K. Louis, Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems [in German], Teubner, Stuttgart (1989).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Schuster, The Method of Approximate Inverse: Theory and Applications, Springer, Heidelberg (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. K. Louis, Feature Reconstruction in Inverse Problems // Inverse Probl. 27, No. 6, Article ID 065010 (2011).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Szegö, Orthogonal Polynomials, Am. Math. Soc., Providence RI (1975).MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sobolev Institute of Mathematics SB RASNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Novosibirsk State UniversityNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations