# Infinite Groups with Rank Restrictions on Subgroups

Article

First Online:

Received:

- 43 Downloads

Classical results by Mal’cev and Šunkov show that locally nilpotent groups and locally finite groups of infinite rank must contain some Abelian subgroups of infinite rank. In recent years, many authors have studied groups in which all subgroups of infinite rank have a given property (which can be either absolute or of embedding type). Results from these researches and some new contributions to this topic are described in this paper.

## Keywords

Normal Subgroup Conjugacy Class Nilpotent Group Abelian Subgroup Proper Subgroup
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.N. S. Černikov, “A theorem on groups of finite special rank,”
*Ukrain. Math. J.*,**42**, 855–861 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 2.M. De Falco, F. de Giovanni, and C. Musella, “Groups whose finite homomorphic images are metahamiltonian,”
*Comm. Algebra*,**37**, 2468–2476 (2009).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 3.M. De Falco, F. de Giovanni, and C. Musella, “Groups whose proper subgroups of infinite rank have a transitive normality relation,”
*Mediterranean J. Math.*,**10**, 1999-2006 (2013).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 4.M. De Falco, F. de Giovanni, C. Musella, and Y. P. Sysak, “On metahamiltonian groups of infinite rank,” J. Algebra (to appear).Google Scholar
- 5.M. De Falco, F. de Giovanni, C. Musella, and Y. P. Sysak, “Groups of infinite rank in which normality is a transitive relation,”
*Glasgow Math. J.*(to appear).Google Scholar - 6.M. De Falco, F. de Giovanni, C. Musella, and N. Trabelsi, “Groups with restrictions on subgroups of infinite rank,”
*Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana*(to appear).Google Scholar - 7.M. De Falco, F. de Giovanni, C. Musella, and N. Trabelsi, “Groups whose proper subgroups of infinite rank have finite conjugacy classes,”
*Bull. Austral. Math. Soc.*(to appear).Google Scholar - 8.M. R. Dixon, M. J. Evans, and H. Smith, “Locally (soluble-by-finite) groups with all proper insoluble subgroups of finite rank,”
*Arch. Math.*(Basel),**68**, 100–109 (1997).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 9.M. R. Dixon, M. J. Evans, and H. Smith, “Locally (soluble-by-finite) groups with all proper nonnilpotent subgroups of finite rank,”
*J. Pure Appl. Algebra*,**135**, 33–43 (1999).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 10.M. R. Dixon and Y. Karatas, “Groups with all subgroups permutable or of finite rank,”
*Centr. Eur. J. Math.*,**10**, 950–957 (2012).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 11.M. J. Evans and Y. Kim, “On groups in which every subgroup of infinite rank is subnormal of bounded defect,”
*Comm. Algebra*,**32**, 2547–2557 (2004).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 12.B. Hartley, “Uncountable artinian modules and uncountable soluble groups satisfying Min-
*n*,”*Proc. London Math. Soc.*,**35**, 55–75 (1977).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 13.L. A. Kurdachenko and H. Smith, “Groups in which all subgroups of infinite rank are subnormal,”
*Glasgow Math. J.*,**46**, 83–89 (2004).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 14.A. I. Mal’cev, “On certain classes of infinite soluble groups,”
*Mat. Sb.*,**28**, 567–588 (1951);*Amer. Math Soc. Transl.*,**2**, 1–21 (1956).Google Scholar - 15.D. McDougall, “Soluble groups with the minimum condition for normal subgroups,”
*Math. Z.*,**118**, 157–167 (1970).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 16.Y. I. Merzljakov, “Locally soluble groups of finite rank,”
*Algebra Logic*,**8**, 686–690 (1969).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 17.W. Möhres, “Aufl¨osbarkeit, von Gruppen, deren Untergruppen alle subnormal sind,”
*Arch. Math.*(Basel),**54**, 232–235 (1990).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 18.B. H. Neumann, “Groups with finite classes of conjugate subgroups,”
*Math. Z.*,**63**, 76–96 (1955).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 19.D. J. S. Robinson, “Groups in which normality is a transitive relation,”
*Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.*,**68**, 21–38 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 20.D. J. S. Robinson,
*Finiteness Conditions and Generalized Soluble Groups*, Springer, Berlin (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 21.G. M. Romalis ans N. F. Sesekin, “Metahamiltonian groups,”
*Ural. Gos. Univ. Mat. Zap.*,**5**, 101–106 (1966).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 22.G. M. Romalis and N. F. Sesekin, “Metahamiltonian groups. II,”
*Ural. Gos. Univ. Mat. Zap.*,**6**, 52–58 (1968).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 23.G. M. Romalis and N. F. Sesekin, “Metahamiltonian groups. III,”
*Ural. Gos. Univ. Mat. Zap.*,**7**, 195–199 (1969/70).Google Scholar - 24.J. E. Roseblade, “On groups in which every subgroup is subnormal,”
*J. Algebra*,**2**, 402–412 (1965).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 25.R. Schmidt,
*Subgroup Lattices of Groups*, de Gruyter, Berlin (1994).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 26.N. N. Semko and S. N. Kuchmenko, “Groups with almost normal subgroups of infinite rank,”
*Ukrain. Math. J.*,**57**, 621–639 (2005).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 27.V. P.
*Š*unkov, “On locally finite groups of finite rank,”*Algebra Logic*,**10**, 127–142 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014