Advertisement

Journal of Mathematical Sciences

, Volume 166, Issue 3, pp 338–356 | Cite as

Analysis of the behavior of a weak solution to m-Hessian equations near the boundary of a domain

  • N. V. Filimonenkova
Article

We consider the Dirichlet problem for the m-Hessian equations F m [u] = f in a domain Ω and analyze the behavior of approximate solutions at the boundary of Ω. We show that the growth rate for weak solutions towards to the boundary locally depends on the summability exponent of f or on the fact whether f belongs to a certain Morrey type space near the boundary. The result obtained can be used for estimating the Hölder constant for weak solutions in the closed domain. Bibliography: 11 titles.

Keywords

Weak Solution Dirichlet Problem Barrier Function Convex Surface Morrey Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    N. M. Ivochkina, N. V. Filimonenkova, “Lemma about increase of approximate solutions to the Dirichlet problem for m-Hessian equations” [in Russian], Probl. Mat. Anal. 38, 37–45 (2008); English transl.: J. Math. Sci., New York 156, No. 4, 606–616 (2009).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. V. Filimonenkova, “Phragmén–Lindelöf type theorem for m-Hessian equations” [in Russian], Probl. Mat. Anal. 39, 147–155 (2009); English transl.: J. Math. Sci., New York 157, No. 6, 948–957 (2009).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. M. Ivochkina, N. V. Filimonenkova, “Estimate of the Hölder constant for solutions to m-Hessian equations” [in Russian], Probl. Mat. Anal. 40, 69–76 (2009); English transl.: J. Math. Sci., New York 159, No. 1, 67–74 (2009).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Garding, “An inequality for hyperbolic polynomials,” J. Math. Mech. 8, 957–965 (1959).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. M. Ivochkina, “A description of the stability cones generated by the differential operators of Monge–Ampère type” [in Russian], Mat. Sb., Nov. Ser. 122, 265–275 (1983); English transl.: Math. USSR Sb. 50, 259–268 (1985).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Caffarelly, L. Nirenberg, J. Spruck, “The Dirichlet problem for nonlinear second order elliptic equations III. Functions of the eigenvalues of the Hessian,” Acta Math. 155, 261–301 (1985).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. S. Trudinger, “Week solutions of Hessian equations,” Commun. Partial Different. Equ. 22, 1251–1261 (1997).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. D. Aleksandrov “The Dirichlet problem for the equation \( Det\left\| {{z_{ij}}} \right\| = \varphi \)” [in Russian], Vestn. LGU, Ser. Mat. Mekh. Astr. 1, 5–24 (1958).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. A. Arkhipova, Regularity of Weak Solutions to Boundary-Value Problems for Linear Equations and Systems of Elliptic Type [in Russian], S.-Petersbrug State Univ. Press, S.-Petersbrug (1998).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, N. N. Uraltseva, Estimates on the Boundary of a Domain for the Hölder Norms of Derivatives of Solutions to Quasilinear Elliptic and Parabolic General Equations, Preprint, LOMI P-I-85. Leningr. (1985).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. M. Ivochkina, “The Dirichlet problem for the equations of curvature of order m” [in Russian], Algebra Anal. 2, No. 3, 192–217 (1990); English transl.: Leningr. Math. J. 2, No. 3, 631–654 (1991).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering 4St. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations