Advertisement

Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications

, Volume 163, Issue 2, pp 642–659 | Cite as

A Differential Game of Transboundary Industrial Pollution with Emission Permits Trading

  • Shoude Li
Article

Abstract

Transboundary pollution is a particularly serious problem as it leads people located at regional borders to disproportionately suffer from pollution. In 2007, a cooperative differential game model of transboundary industrial pollution was presented by Yeung. It is the first time that time-consistent solutions are derived in a cooperative differential game on pollution control with industries and governments being separate entities. In this paper, we extend Yeung’s model to an even more general model, in which emission permits trading is taken into account. Our objective is to make use of optimal control theory to find the two regions’ noncooperative and cooperative optimal emission paths such that the regions’ discounted stream of net revenues is maximized. We illustrate the results with a numerical example.

Keywords

Differential game Emission permits trading HJB equation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the comments of the anonymous referees, the editor for careful reading and valuable comments on the first version of this paper, and Long Chen for his assistance in mathematical derivation and numerical analysis. Any remaining errors are my responsibility. This research was supported by the Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of Shanghai, China (Project No. 2012BJB002).

References

  1. 1.
    Kaitala, V., Pohjola, M., Tahvonen, O.: Transboundary air pollution and soil acidification: a dynamic analysis of an acid rain game between Finland and the USSR. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2, 161–181 (1992) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaitala, V., Pohjola, M., Tahvonen, O.: An economic analysis of transboundary air pollution between Finland and the Soviet Union. Scand. J. Econ. 94, 409–424 (1992) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Long, N.V.: Pollution control: a differential game approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 37, 283–296 (1992) MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van der Ploeg, F., de Zeeuw, A.J.: International aspects of pollution control. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2(2), 117–139 (1992) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dockner, E.J., Long, N.V.: International pollution control: cooperative versus noncooperative strategies. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 25, 13–29 (1993) CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zagonari, F.: International pollution problems: unilateral initiatives by environmental groups in one country. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 36(1), 46–69 (1998) CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin, W.E., Patrick, R.H., Tolwinski, B.: A dynamic game of a transboundary pollutant with asymmetric players. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 24, 1–12 (1993) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoel, M.: Emission taxes in a dynamic international game of CO2 emissions. In: Pethig, R. (ed.) Conflicts and Cooperations in Managing Environmental Resources. Springer, Berlin (1992) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoel, M.: Intertemporal properties of an international carbon tax. Resour. Energy Econ. 15(1), 51–70 (1993) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dockner, E., Long, N.V., Sorger, G.: Analysis of Nash equilibria in a class of capital accumulation games. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 20, 1209–1235 (1996) MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maler, K.G., de Zeeuw, A.: The acid rain differential game. Environ. Resour. Econ. 12, 167–184 (1998) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    List, J.A., Mason, C.F.: Optimal institutional arrangements for transboundary pollutants in a second-best world: evidence from a differential game with asymmetric players. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 42, 277–296 (2001) CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yanase, A.: Pollution control in open economies: implications of within-period interactions for dynamic game equilibrium. J. Econ. 84(3), 277–311 (2005) MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dutta, P.K., Radner, R.: Population growth and technological change in a global warming model. Econ. Theory 29, 251–270 (2006) MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dutta, P.K., Radner, R.: Strategic analysis of global warming: theory and some numbers. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 71(2), 187–209 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yeung, D.W.K.: Dynamically consistent cooperative solution in a differential game of transboundary industrial pollution. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 134, 143–160 (2007) MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yeung, D.W.K., Petrosyan, L.A.: A cooperative stochastic differential game of transboundary industrial pollution. Automatica 44, 1532–1544 (2008) MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Forster, B.: Optimal consumption planning in a polluted environment. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2, 1–6 (1973) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Breton, M., Zaccour, G., Zahaf, M.: A differential game of joint implementation of environmental projects. Automatica 41, 1737–1749 (2005) MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Breton, M., Martin-Herran, G.: Equilibrium investment strategies in foreign environmental projects. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 130, 23–40 (2006) MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jørgensen, S., Zaccour, G.: Incentive equilibrium strategies and welfare allocation in a dynamic game of pollution control. Automatica 37, 29–36 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Antai College of Economics and ManagementShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations