Performance-Reliability-Aided Decision-Making in Multiperson Quadratic Decision Games Against Jamming and Estimation Confrontations

  • K. D. Pham


The work presents an attainment of risk-averse cooperative solutions in multi-person, single-objective decision problems for practical situations of the probabilistic (rather than deterministic) nature of performance reliability, its consequences on measuring performance reliability, and the difference between predicting and designing for performance reliability. In particular, some novel research contributions include: (i) closed-loop performance assessment via a performance-information analysis; (ii) cooperative decision selection via a risk-value model; and (iii) risk-averse cooperative decision strategies against confrontations and noncooperation from a malevolent opponent and a stationary environment, respectively.


Multiperson quadratic decision game Jamming confrontations Performance-information analysis Statistical optimal control Risk-averse decision making 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Pham, K.D., Sain, M.K., Liberty, S.R.: Cost cumulant control: state-feedback, finite-horizon paradigm with application to seismic protection. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 115, 685–710 (2002). Miele, A. (ed.) Special Issue MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pham, K.D., Sain, M.K., Liberty, S.R.: Infinite horizon robustly stable seismic protection of cable-stayed bridges using cost cumulants. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference, pp. 691–696 (2004) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pham, K.D.: New risk-averse control paradigm for stochastic two-time-scale systems and performance robustness. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 146, 511–537 (2010) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pham, K.D.: Cooperative solutions in multi-person quadratic decision problems: finite-horizon and state-feedback cost-cumulant control paradigm. In: Proceedings of 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2484–2490 (2007) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pham, K.D., Liberty, S.R., Jin, G.: Multi-cumulant and Pareto solutions for tactics change prediction and performance analysis in stochastic multi-team non-cooperative games. In: Won, C.-H., Schrader, C., Michel, A.N. (eds.) Advances in Statistical Control, Algebraic Systems Theory, and Dynamic Systems Characteristics. Systems & Control: Foundations and Applications, pp. 65–97. Birkhäuser, Boston (2008) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Field, R.V., Bergman, L.A.: Reliability based approach to linear covariance control design. J. Eng. Mech. 124, 193–199 (1998) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simon, D.: A game theory approach to constrained minimax state estimation. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 54, 405–412 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wei, M., Chen, G., Cruz, J.B., Haynes, L.S., Pham, K.D., Blasch, E.: Multi-player multi-evader pursuit-evasion games with jamming confrontation. J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun. 4, 693–706 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yaesh, I., Shaked, U.: Game theory approach to optimal linear state estimation and its relation to the minimum H norm estimation. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 37, 828–831 (1992) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fleming, W.H., Rishel, R.W.: Deterministic and Stochastic Optimal Control. Springer, New York (1975) MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The United States Air Force Research Laboratory, Space Vehicles DirectorateKirtland Air Force BaseAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations