Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Modern Scientific Literacy: A Case Study of Multiliteracies and Scientific Practices in a Fifth Grade Classroom

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the convergence of multiliteracies and scientific practices in a fifth grade classroom. As students’ lives become increasingly multimodal, diverse, and globalized, the traditional notions of literacy must be revisited (New London Group 1996). With the adoption of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS Lead States 2013a) in many states, either in their entirety or in adapted forms, it becomes useful to explore the interconnectedness multiliteracies and scientific practices and the resulting implications for scientific literacy. The case study included a fifth grade classroom, including the students and teacher. In order to create a rich description of the cases involved, data were collected and triangulated through teacher interviews, student interviews and focus groups, and classroom observations. Findings reveal that as science activities were enriched with multiliteracies and scientific practices, students were engaged in developing skills and knowledge central to being scientifically literate. Furthermore, this study establishes that characteristics of scientific literacy, by its intent and purpose, are a form of multiliteracies in elementary classrooms. Therefore, the teaching and learning of science and its practices for scientific literacy are in turn reinforcing the development of broader multiliteracies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajayi, L. (2011). A multiliteracies pedagogy: exploring semiotic possibilities of a Disney video in a third grade diverse classroom. The Urban Review, 43(3), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-010-0151-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastopoulou, S., Sharples, M., & Baber, C. (2011). An evolution of multimodal interactions with technology while learning science concepts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 266–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01017.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. (2012). “It’s funny that we don’t see the similarities when that’s what we’re aiming for”—visualizing and challenging teachers’ stereotypes of gender and science. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9200-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banjong, D. (2014). Same performance but different perception: female stereotypes in mathematics emerge in fifth grade. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(2), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2014.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, C., Lauricella, A., Wartella, E., Robb, M., & Schomburg, R. (2013). Adoption and use of technology in early education: the interplay of extrinsic barriers and teacher attitudes. Computers in Education, 69, 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., & Johnson, H. (2012). Improving the acquisition and retention of science material by fifth grade students through the use of imagery interventions. Instructional Science, 40(6), 925–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9197-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J., & Goldston, J. (2011). What do you see? Science and Children, 49(1), 42–47.

  • Coleman, J., McTigue, E., & Smolkin, L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ use of graphical representations in science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(7), 613–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9204-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J., Bradley, L., & Donovan, C. (2012). Visual representations in second graders’ information book compositions. The Reading Teacher, 66(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00339.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (1994). New alignments and old literacies: from fast capitalism to the canon Australian Reading Association. In B. Shortland-Jones, B. Bosich, & J. Rivalland (Eds.), Living literacy: conference papers, Australian Reading Association twentieth national conference. Australian Reading Association.

  • Gee, J. P. (2000). New people in new worlds: networks, the new capitalism and schools. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 43–68). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2013). The anti-education era: creating smarter students through digital learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: an introduction. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldston, J., Allison, E., Fowler, L., & Glaze, A. (2013). The dynamic earth: Recycling naturally. Science and Children, 50(8), 38–45.

  • Goldston, M. J., & Downey, L. (2013). Your science classroom: Becoming and Elementary/Middle school science teacher. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

  • Greer, R., & Sweeney, T. (2012). Students’ voices about learning with technology. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 294–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, P. (1970). Scientific enlightenment for an age of science. The Science Teacher, 37, 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, P. (1998). Scientific literacy: new minds for a changing world. Issues and Trends, 82(3), 407–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2006). Discussing new literacies. Language Arts, 84(1), 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2009). Digital literacies: wikis, digital literacies, and professional growth. Journal & of Adolescent Adult Literacy, 52(7), 631–634. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.7.8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203164754.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013a). Next generation science standards. Retrieved from www.nextgenscience.org

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013b). Appendix F: Science and Engineering Practices in the NGSS. Retrieved from www.nextgenscience.org

  • NRC. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC. (2007). Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2010). Representing science literacies: an introduction. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9153-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowsell, J., McLean, C., & Hamilton, M. (2012). Visual literacy as a classroom approach. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55, 444–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholastic Inc. (2014). Science court. Retrieved from www.tomsnyder.com

  • Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K., & Moje, E. (2010). Relating multimodal representations to the literacies of science. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9158-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. (2006). Slash writers and guinea pigs as models for a scientific multiliteracy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(5), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00215.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yore, L., & Hand, B. (2010). Epilogue: plotting a research agenda for multiple representations, multiple modality, and multimodal representational competency. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9160-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yore, L., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9089-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Alabama, 307 University Blvd., N, Mobile, AL, 36688-0002, USA

    Elizabeth Allison

  2. University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA

    M. Jenice Goldston

Authors
  1. Elizabeth Allison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Jenice Goldston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Allison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allison, E., Goldston, M.J. Modern Scientific Literacy: A Case Study of Multiliteracies and Scientific Practices in a Fifth Grade Classroom. J Sci Educ Technol 27, 270–283 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9723-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9723-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation