Abstract
This study employs a single framework for investigating both environmental journalistic texts published on news websites, and science teachers’ choices of such texts for their teaching. We analyzed 188 environmental items published during 2 months in seven news websites to determine popularity of topics. Then, 64 science junior high school teachers responded to a closed questionnaire to identify their preferred topics for using in the classroom and patterns of using environmental news items. In a second, open-ended questionnaire, responded by 50 teachers, we investigated the teachers’ media literacy in terms of identifying text types and writers of environmental news items. Good alignment was found between the published topics on the websites and teachers’ choices, with somewhat different distribution of topics, which could be explained by curriculum requirements. Teachers’ identification of text types and writer types was inaccurate, which implied that their media literacy is inadequate. We argue that media literacy is required for effective use of journalistic texts in science teaching.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikenhead, G. S. (2005). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Badenschier, F. & Wormer, H. (2012). Issue selection in science journalism: towards a special theory of news values for science news? In Rödder, S., Franze, M., & Weingart, P. (eds). The sciences' media connection – Public communication & its repercussions (pp. 59–85). Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 28 Netherland: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Osborne, J. (2015). Editorial: bridging science education & science communication research. J Res Sci Teach, 52(2), 135–144.
Botkin, D.B., Keller, E.A., & Rosenthal, D.B. (2012) Environmental science: Earth as a living planet, 8th edition, Wiley.
Brossard, D. (2013). New media landscapes and the science information consumer. PNAS, 110(3), www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1212744110
Brunfiel, B. (2009). Supplanting the old media? Nature, 458, 274–277.
Bubela, T., Nisbet, M. C., Borchelt, R., Brunger, F., Critchley, C., Einsiedel, E., et al. (2009). Science communication reconsidered. Nat Biotechnol, 27(6), 514–518.
Bybee, R. Y. (1993). Reforming science education, social perspectives & personal reflections. New York: Teachers College.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Science literacy: another look at its historical & contemporary meanings & its relationship to science education reform. J Res Sci Teach, 37, 582–601.
Dimopoulos, K., & Koulaidis, V. (2003). Science and technology education for citizenship: the potential role of the press. Sci Educ, 87(2), 241–256.
Fahy, D., & Nisbet, M. C. (2011). The science journalist online: shifting roles & emerging practices. Journalism, 12(7), 778–793.
Feinstein, N. W. (2015). Communication & science in the public sphere. J Res Sci Teach, 52(2), 145–163.
Feinstein, N. W., Allen, S., & Jenkins, E. (2013). Outside the pipeline: reimagining science education for nonscientists. Science, 340(6130), 314–317.
Hobbs, R. (2011) Digital and media literacy: connecting culture & classroom. Corwin Press.
Hobbs, R., & Jensen, A. (2013). The past, present, and future of media literacy Education. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1(1), 1–11. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jmle/vol1/iss1/1.
Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching & learning science: towards a personalized approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: science education for an alternative future. Int J Sci Educ, 25(6), 5–670.
Hodson, D. (2013). Don’t be nervous, don’t be flustered, don’t be scared. Be prepared. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education, 13, 313–331.
Jarman, R., & McClune, B. (2002). A survey of the use of newspapers in science instruction by secondary teachers in Northern Ireland. Int J Sci Educ, 24(10), 997–1020.
Klosterman, M. L., Sadler, T. D., & Brown, J. (2012). Science teachers’ use of mass media to address socio-scientific & sustainability issues. Res Sci Educ, 42(1), 51–74.
Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Sci Educ, 85(3), 291–310.
Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2007). The elements of journalism: what newspeople should know and the public should expect. New York: Three Rivers Press.
Lewenstein, B. V. (2015). Identifying what matters: science education, science communication, & democracy. J Res Sci Teach, 52(2), 253–262.
McClune, B., & Jarman, R. (2010). Critical reading of science-based news reports: establishing a knowledge, skills and attitudes framework. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 727–752.
McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.
McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 58–67.
Meyer, M. (2010). The rise of the knowledge broke. Science Communication, 32(1), 118–127.
Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: T=teaching socio-scientific issues. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Rennie, L. J. (2014). Teaching science outside of school (pp. 120–144). In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. New York: Routledge.
Rensberger, B. (2009). Science journalism: too close for comfort. Nature, 459, 1055–1056.
Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, & science education (pp. 545–558). In N. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), H&book of research on science education (Vol. II). Abingdon: Routledge.
Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42.
Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving the goals of science education. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom. New York: Springer.
Secko, D. M., Amend, E., & Friday, T. (2013). Four models of science journalism: a synthesis & practical assessment. Journal Pract, 7(1), 62–80.
Shoemaker, P. J. (1991). Gatekeeping. Thous & Oaks: Sage.
Simonneaux, L. (2013). Questions socialement vives & socio-scientific issues: new trends of research to meet the training needs of postmodern society (pp. 37-54). In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clément (Eds.), Topics & trends in current science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Solomon, J., & Thomas, J. (1999). Science education for the public understanding of science. Stud Sci Educ, 33, 61–89.
Tal, T., & Kedmi, Y. (2006). Teaching socioscientific issues: classroom culture and students’ performances. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 615–644.
Tal, T., Kali, Y., Magid, S., & Madhok, J. J. (2011). Enhancing the authenticity of a Web-based module for teaching simple inheritance. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (pp. 11–38). Netherlands: Springer.
Trench, B. (2007). How the Internet changed science journalism (pp. 133–141). In M. Bauer & M. Bucchi (Eds.), Journalism, Science & Society: Science communication: Between News & Public Relations. New York: Routledge.
Wellington, J. (1991). Newspaper science, school science: friends or enemies? Int J Sci Educ, 13(4), 363–372.
White, D. M. (1950). The “gate keeper”: a case study in the selection of news. Journal Q, 27, 383–390.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ginosar, A., Tal, T. Teaching Journalistic Texts in Science Classes: the Importance of Media Literacy. J Sci Educ Technol 27, 205–214 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9718-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9718-9