Advertisement

Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 223–237 | Cite as

“Failure Is a Major Component of Learning Anything”: The Role of Failure in the Development of STEM Professionals

Article

Abstract

The term failure typically evokes negative connotations in educational settings and is likely to be accompanied by negative emotional states, low sense of confidence, and lack of persistence. These negative emotional and behavioral states may factor into an individual not pursuing a degree or career in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM). This is of particular concern considering the low number of women and underrepresented minorities pursing and working in a STEM field. Utilizing interview data with professionals across STEM, we sought to understand the role failure played in the persistence of individuals who enter and pursue paths toward STEM-related careers. Findings highlighted how participants’ experiences with failure (1) shaped their outlooks or views of failure, (2) shaped their trajectories within STEM, and (3) provided them with additional skills or qualities. A few differences based on participants’ sex, field, and highest degree also manifested in our analysis. We expect the results from this study to add research-based results to the current conversation around whether experiences with failure should be part of formal and informal educational settings and standards-based practices.

Keywords

Career Education Failure Persistence STEM 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Google, Inc. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Google, Inc.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved through the Institutional Review Board. Therefore, all procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Supplementary material

10956_2016_9674_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Online Resource 1 (DOCX 13.6 kb)
10956_2016_9674_MOESM2_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Online Resource 2 (DOCX 15.6 kb)

References

  1. Allchin D (2012) Teaching the nature of science through scientific errors. Sci Educ 96(5):904–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assouline SG, Colangelo N, Ihrig D, Forstadt L (2006) Attributional choices for academic success and failure by intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly 50(4):283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball LC, Cribbie RA, Steele JR (2013) Beyond gender differences: using tests of equivalence to evaluate gender similarities. Psychol Women Q 37(2):147–154. doi: 10.1177/0361684313480483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks M, Woolfson L (2008) Why do students think they fail? The relationship between attributions and academic self-perceptions. British Journal of Special Education 35(1):49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry RG (1975) Fear of failure in the student experience. Personnel & Guidance Journal 54(4):190–203Google Scholar
  6. Bidjerano T (2010) Self-conscious emotions in response to perceived failure: a structural equation model. J Exp Educ 78(3):318–342. doi: 10.1080/00220970903548079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolinger AR, Brown KD (2015) Entrepreneurial failure as a threshold concept: the effects of student experiences. J Manag Educ 39(4):452–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boruchovitch E (2004) A study of causal attributions for success and failure in mathematics among Brazilian students. Interamerican Journal of Psychology 38(1):53–60Google Scholar
  9. Britner SL, Pajares F (2006) Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. J Res Sci Teach 43(5):485–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bujold C (2004) Constructing career through narrative. J Vocat Behav 64:470–484. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2003.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burke RJ, Mattis MC (2007) Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: upping the numbers. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carr, A. (2013) In support of failure. Composition Forum, 27. Retrieved from http://compositionforum.com/issue/27/failure.php
  13. Cetin B, Ilhan M, Yilmaz F (2014) An investigation of the relationship between the fear of receiving negative criticism and of taking academic risk through canonical correlation analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 14(1):146–158. doi: 10.12738/estp.2014.1.1616 Google Scholar
  14. Cohen L, Manion L, Morison K (2011) Research methods in education, 7th edn. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Conroy DE (2003) Representational models associated with fear of failure in adolescents and young adults. J Psychol 71(5):757–784Google Scholar
  16. Corbett C, Hill C, St. Rose A (2008) Where the girls are: the facts about gender equity in education. AAUW Educational Foundation, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Del Frate L (2013) Failure of engineering artifacts: a life cycle approach. Sci Eng Ethics 19(3):913–944. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9360-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Derelöv M (2008) Qualitative modelling of potential failures: on evaluation of conceptual design. J Eng Des 19(3):201–225. doi: 10.1080/09544820701255858 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duckworth AL, Peterson C, Matthews MD, Kelly DR (2007) Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J Pers Soc Psychol 92(6):1087–1101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duval TS, Silvia PJ (2002) Self-awareness, probability of improvement, and the self-serving bias. J Pers Soc Psychol 82(1):49–61. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dweck CS (2006) Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random House, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  22. Eisenhart M (2009) Generalization from qualitative inquiry. In: Ercikan K, Roth WM (eds) Generalizing from educational research: beyond qualitative and quantitative polarization. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 51–66Google Scholar
  23. Ellis S, Mendel R, Nir M (2006) Learning from successful and failed experience: the moderating role of kind of after-event review. J Appl Psychol 91(3):669–680. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Else-Quest NM, Hyde JS, Linn MC (2010) Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 136(1):103–127. doi: 10.1037/a0018053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foll DL, Rascle O, Higgins NC (2006) Persistence in a putting task during perceived failure: influence of state-attributions and attributional style. Appl Psychol 55(4):586–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franco M, Haase H (2010) Failure factors in small and medium-sized enterprises: qualitative study from an attributional perspective. Int Entrep Manag J 6(4):503–521. doi: 10.1007/s11365-009-0124-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Good C, Rattan A, Dweck CS (2012) Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation of mathematics. J Pers Soc Psychol 102(4):700–717. doi: 10.1037/a0026659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (2009) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
  29. Glover JA, Corkill AJ (1987) Influence of paraphrase repetitions on the spacing effect. J Educ Psychol 79:198–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guler DMP (2013) Success and failure in science education: a focus group study on Turkish students. J Balt Sci Educ 12(6):716–729Google Scholar
  31. Heyd-Metzuyanim E (2015) Vicious cycles of identifying and mathematizing: a case study of the development of mathematical failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences 24(4):504–549. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2014.999270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hong HY, Lin-Siegler X (2012) How learning about scientists’ struggles influences students’ interest and learning in physics. J Educ Psychol 104(2):469–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hyde JS (2014) Gender similarities and differences. Annu Rev Psychol 65:373–398. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. International Society for Technology in Education [ISTE] (2015) ISTE standards: students. ISTE, Eugene, OR Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards/standards-for-students Google Scholar
  35. Jonassen D, Strobel J, Lee CB (2006) Everyday problem solving in engineering: lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education – Washington 95(2):139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kane TJ, Staiger DO (2002) The promise and pitfall of using imprecise school accountability measures. J Econ Perspect 16(4):91–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kapur M (2008) Productive failure. Cogn Instr 26(3):379–424. doi: 10.1080/07370000802212669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kapur M (2011) A further study of productive failure in mathematical problem solving: unpacking the design components. Instr Sci 39(4):561–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kapur M (2014) Productive failure in learning math. Cogn Sci 38:1008–1022. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Khan YA, Ahamad Z, Kousar S (2013) Factors influencing academic failure of university students. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies 5(5):79–84Google Scholar
  41. Kim JY, Kim JJ, Miner AS (2009) Organizational learning from extreme performance experience: the impact of success and recovery experience. Organ Sci 20(6):958–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Koch SC, Muller SM, Sieverding M (2008) Women and computers. Effects of stereotype threat on attribution of failure. Comput Educ 51:1795–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lin-Sielger X, Ahn JN, Chen J, Fang FFA, Luna-Lucero M (2016) Even Einstein struggled: effects of learning about great scientists ‘struggles on high school students’ motivation to learn science. J Educ Psychol 108(3):314–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lloyd JE, Walsh J, Yailagh MS (2005) Sex differences in performance attributions, self-efficacy, and achievement in mathematics: if I’m so smart, why don’t I know it? Can J Educ 28(3):384–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lottero-Perdue, P. S. (2016) Fifth graders’ perceptions about failure and mindsets before and after learning to engineer. Paper presented at the NARST International Conference. Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  46. Lottero-Perdue PS, & Parry EA (2014) Perspectives on failure in the classroom by elementary teachers new to teaching engineering. Paper presented at the 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Indianapolis, INGoogle Scholar
  47. Maltese AV, Melki CS (in review) STEM Pathways: do men and women differ in why they enter and exit? AERA OpenGoogle Scholar
  48. Maltese AV, Tai RH (2011) Pipeline persistence: the effects of school experiences on earning degrees in STEM. Sci Educ 95(5):877–907Google Scholar
  49. Maltese AV, Melki CS, Wiebke H (2014) The nature of experiences responsible for the generation and maintenance of interest in STEM. Sci Educ 98(6):937–962Google Scholar
  50. Merriam Webster, Incorporated (2015) Failure. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/
  51. Merton RK (1948) The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review 8(2):193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mintrop H, Sunderman GL (2009) Predictable failure of federal sanctions-driven accountability for school improvement—and why we may retain it anyway. Educ Res 38(5):353–364. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09339055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2014) Principles to actions: ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  54. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2015) Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Special report NSF 15–311. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA Retrieved from www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/Google Scholar
  55. NGSS Lead States (2013) Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  56. Nicolaidou M, Ainscow M (2005) Understanding failing schools: perspectives from the inside. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice 16(3):229–248. doi: 10.1080/09243450500113647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nosek BA, Smyth FL, Hansen JJ, Devos T, Lindner NM, Ranganath KA et al (2007) Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 18(1):36–88. doi: 10.1080/10463280701489053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Partnership for twenty-first Century Learning (2015) P21 Framework Definitions. Washington, DC: P21. Retrieved from www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_Framework_Definitions _New_Logo _2015.pdf
  59. Pawlina S, Stanford C (2011) Preschoolers grow their brains: shifting mindsets for greater resiliency and better problem solving. YC Young Children 66(5):30–35Google Scholar
  60. Peterson H (2010) The gendered construction of technical self-confidence: Women’s negotiated positions in male-dominated, technical work settings. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 2(1):66–88Google Scholar
  61. Petrowski H (2012) To forgive design: understanding failure. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Polkinghorne DE (1988) Narrative knowing and the human sciences. State University of New York Press, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
  63. Potter P (2013) Technologists talk: making the links between design, problem-solving and experiences with hard materials. Int J Technol Des Educ 23(1):69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reyna C (2000) Lazy, dumb, or industrious: when stereotypes convey attribution information in the classroom. Educ Psychol Rev 12(1):85–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Richards K (2003) Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rosenthal L, London B, Levy SR, Lobel M (2011) The roles of perceived identity compatibility and social support for women in a single-sex STEM program at a co-educational university. Sex Roles 65(9–10):725–736. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9945-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sagar SS, Lavallee D (2010) The development origins of fear of failure in adolescent athletes: examining parental practices. Psychol Sport Exerc 11(3):177–187. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sagar SS, Lavallee D, Spray CM (2007) Why young elite athletes fear failure: consequences of failure. Journal of Sports Science 25(11):1171–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Saldaña J (2014) Thinking qualitatively: methods of mind. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks: CAGoogle Scholar
  70. Sax L (2005) Why gender matters. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Schunk DH, Gunn TP (1986) Self-efficacy and skill development: influence of task strategies and attributions. Journal of Educational Research 79(4):238–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shapiro J, Williams A (2012) The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles 66(3):175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Simpson A (2015) Kaleidoscopic view of voices shaping female and male adolescents’ dynamic mathematics identity within single-sex and coeducational environments. [Doctoral Dissertation]Google Scholar
  74. Simpson A, Quigley CF (2016) Member checking process with adolescent students: not fust reading a transcript. Qual Rep 21(2):376–392Google Scholar
  75. Slegers NJ, Kadish RT, Payton GE, Thomas J, Griffin MD, Dumbacher D (2012) Learning from failure in systems engineering: a panel discussion. Syst Eng 15(1):74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Smith S (2015) Epic fails: Reconceptualizing failure as a catalyst for developing creative persistence within teaching and learning experiences. J Technol Teach Educ 23(3):329–355Google Scholar
  77. Standing C, Guilfoyle A, Lin C, Love PE (2006) The attribution of success and failure in IT projects. Ind Manag Data Syst 106(8):1148–1165. doi: 10.1108/02635570610710809 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Swim JK, Sanna LJ (1996) He’s skilled, she’s lucky: a meta-analysis of observers’ attributions for women’s and men’s successes and failures. Personal. Social Psychology Bulletin 22:507–519Google Scholar
  79. Tahirsylaj AS (2012) Stimulating creativity and innovation through intelligent fast failure. Thinking Skills and Creativity 7(3):265–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tai RH, Liu CQ, Maltese AV, Fan XT (2006) Planning early for careers in science. Science 312(5777):1143–1144Google Scholar
  81. Thomas, A. M. (2016). Why I don’t embrace failure (ED FOO lightening talk) [Blog]. Retrieved from http://annmariethomas.typepad.com/
  82. Thomas AM (2014) Making makers: kids, tools, and the future of innovation. Maker Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CAGoogle Scholar
  83. Tolli AP, Schmidt AM (2008) The role of feedback, causal attributions, and self-efficacy in goal revision. J Appl Psychol 93(3):692–701. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.692 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tracy SJ (2010) Qualitative quality: eight “big-ten” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq 16(10):837–851. doi: 10.1177/1077800410383121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Triplett CF (2007) The social construction of “struggle”: influences of school literacy contexts, curriculum, and relationships. J Lit Res 39(1):95–126Google Scholar
  86. Von Zedtwitz M (2002) Organizational learning through post-project reviews in R&D. R&D Manag 32(3):255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wagner T (2012) Creating innovators: the making of young people who will change the world. Scribner, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  88. Wear D, Zarconi J (2008) Can compassion be taught? Let’s ask our students. J Gen Intern Med 23(7):948–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Weiner B (2010) The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: a history of ideas. Educ Psychol 45(1):28–36. doi: 10.1080/00461520903433596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Weiner B (2000) Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attribution perspective. Educ Psychol Rev 12(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Weiner B (1992) Human motivation: metaphors, theory, and research. Sage, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  92. Weiner B (1986) An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Springer, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Weiner B (1985) An attribution theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychol Rev 92:548–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Whittaker B (1999) What went wrong? Unsuccessful information technology projects. Information Management & Computer Security 7(1):23–30. doi: 10.1108/09685229910255160
  95. Yeager DS, Dweck CS (2012) Mindsets that promote resilience: when students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educ Psychol 47(4):302–314. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.722805 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zeldin AL, Britner SL, Pajares F (2008) A comparative study of the self-efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers. J Res Sci Teach 45(9):1036–1058. doi: 10.1002/tea.20195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zeldin AL, Pajares F (2000) Against the odds: self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. Am Educ Res J 37(1):215–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zohri A (2011) Causal attributions for failure and the effect of gender among Moroccan EFL university learners. English Language Teaching 4(4):130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematics Education, W.W. Wright School of EducationIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Science Education, Adjunct Faculty in Geological Sciences, W.W. Wright School of EducationIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations