Guidance Provided by Teacher and Simulation for Inquiry-Based Learning: a Case Study
- 923 Downloads
Current research indicates that inquiry-based learning should be guided in order to achieve optimal learning outcomes. The need for guidance is even greater when simulations are used because of their high information content and the difficulty of extracting information from them. Previous research on guidance for learning with simulations has concentrated on guidance provided by the simulation. Little research has been done on the role of the teacher in guiding learners with inquiry-based activities using simulations. This descriptive study focuses on guidance provided during small group investigations; pre-service teachers (n = 8) guided third and fifth graders using a particular simulation. Data was collected using screen capture videos. The data was analyzed using a combination of theory- and data-driven analysis. Forms of guidance provided by the simulation and by the teachers were divided into the same categories. The distribution of the guidance between the teacher and the simulation was also analyzed. The categories for forms of guidance provided by simulations proved to be applicable to guidance provided by the teachers as well. Teachers offered more various forms of guidance than the simulation. The teachers adapted their guidance and used different patterns to complement the guidance provided by the simulation. The results of the study show that guidance provided by teachers and simulations have different affordances, and both should be present in the classroom for optimal support of learning. This has implications for both teaching with simulations and development of new simulations.
KeywordsSimulations Educational technology Inquiry-based learning Guidance Scaffolding
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
This study has been partially funded through a grant from the Technology Industries of Finland Centennial Foundation and from the Ellen and Artturi Nyyssönen Foundation.
- Black P (2009) From frequent testing to interactive dialogue: diversity and challenge. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation 6(12):iii–iviGoogle Scholar
- Clark DB, Nelson B, Sengupta P, D’Angelo C (2009). Rethinking science learning through digital games and simulations: genres, examples, and evidence. Paper commissioned for the National Research Council Workshop on Gaming and Simulations, October 6–7, Washington, DC. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_080068.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2016
- de Jong T (2006a) Scaffolds for scientific discovery learning. In: Elen J, Clark RE (eds) Handling complexity in learning environments: theory and research. Elsevier, London, pp. 107–128Google Scholar
- de Jong T, Sotiriou S, Gillet D (2014) Innovations in STEM education: the Go-Lab federation of online labs. Smart Learning Environments 1(1):1–16Google Scholar
- Eckhardt M, Urhahne D, Conrad O, Harms U (2013) How effective is instructional support for learning with computer simulations?. Instr Sci 41(1):105–124Google Scholar
- Ferguson R (2012) Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 4(5–6):304–317Google Scholar
- Lehtinen A, Nieminen P, Viiri, J (2016). Preservice teachers’ TPACK beliefs and attitudes toward simulations. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/volume-16/issue-2-16/science/preservice-teachers-tpack-beliefs-and-attitudestoward-simulations/
- National Research Council (1996) National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (2000) Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: a guide for teaching and learning. National Academy of Sciences, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- NGSS Lead States (2013) Next generation science standards: for states, by states. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Pedaste M, Mäeots M, Siiman LA, De Jong T, Van Riesen SA, Kamp ET et al (2015) Phases of inquiry-based learning: definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educ Res Rev 14:47–61Google Scholar
- University of Colorado Boulder (2016) PhET simulations Retrieved from http://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/
- van Joolingen W, de Jong T (2003) SimQuest: authoring educational simulations. In: Murray T, Blessing S, Ainsworth S (eds) Authoring tools for advanced technology educational software: Toward cost-effective production of adaptive, interactive, and intelligent educational software. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 1–31Google Scholar
- van Joolingen W, De Jong T, Dimitrakopoulou A (2007) Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science. J Comput Assist Learn 23(2):111–119Google Scholar
- Veermans KH (2003) Intelligent support for discovery learning. PhD dissertation. University of Twente, TwenteGoogle Scholar
- Veermans K, van Joolingen W, de Jong T (2006) Use of heuristics to facilitate scientific discovery learning in a simulation learning environment in a physics domain. Int J Sci Educ 28(4):341–361Google Scholar