“Flipped classroom” teaching methodology is a type of blended learning in which the traditional class setting is inverted. Lecture is shifted outside of class, while the classroom time is employed to solve problems or doing practical works through the discussion/peer collaboration of students and instructors. This relatively new instructional methodology claims that flipping your classroom engages more effectively students with the learning process, achieving better teaching results. Thus, this research aimed to evaluate the effects of the flipped classroom on the students’ performance and perception of this new methodology. This study was conducted in a general science course, sophomore of the Primary Education bachelor degree in the Training Teaching School of the University of Extremadura (Spain) during the course 2014/2015. In order to assess the suitability of the proposed methodology, the class was divided in two groups. For the first group, a traditional methodology was followed, and it was used as control. On the other hand, the “flipped classroom” methodology was used in the second group, where the students were given diverse materials, such as video lessons and reading materials, before the class to be revised at home by them. Online questionnaires were as well provided to assess the progress of the students before the class. Finally, the results were compared in terms of students’ achievements and a post-task survey was also conducted to know the students’ perceptions. A statistically significant difference was found on all assessments with the flipped class students performing higher on average. In addition, most students had a favorable perception about the flipped classroom noting the ability to pause, rewind and review lectures, as well as increased individualized learning and increased teacher availability.
Inverted methodology General science teaching Pre-service teacher students Teaching methodology
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This work was founded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain (Research Project EDU2012-34140) and European Regional Development Fund (Project GR15009 of Govern of Extremadura).
Beichner RJ, Saul JM (2003) Introduction to the SCALE-UP (Student-Centered activities for large enrolment undergraduate programs) project. Proceeding of the international school of physics “Enrico Fermi”, Varenna, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Bergmann J, Sams A (2014) Flipped learning: maximizing face time. Train Dev 68:28–31Google Scholar
Bishop JL, Verleger M (2013) The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Antlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
Davies RS, Dean DL, Ball N (2013) Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educ Tech Res Dev 61(4):563–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason GS, Rutar TS, Cook KE (2013) Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. Educ IEEE Trans 56(4):430–435. doi:10.1109/TE.2013.2249066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattis KV (2014) Flipped classroom versus traditional textbook instruction: assessing accuracy and mental effort at different levels of mathematical complexity. Technol Knowl Learn. doi:10.1007/s10758-014-9238-0Google Scholar
Moraros J, Islam A, Yu S, Banow R, Schindelka B (2015) Flipping for success: evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting. BMC Med Educ. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0317-2Google Scholar
Sams A, Bergmann J (2013) Flip your students’ learning. Technol Rich Learn 70(6):16–20Google Scholar
Silverberg Lee J, Tierney John, Bodek Matthew J (2014) Use of doceri software for iPad in online delivery of chemistry content. J Chem Educ 91(11):1999–2001. doi:10.1021/ed4009057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowa L, Thorsen D (2015) An assessment of student learning, perceptions and social capital development in undergraduate, lower-division STEM courses employing a flipped classroom pedagogy. Paper presented at the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar