Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 875–887 | Cite as

Flipped Classrooms for Advanced Science Courses



This article explains how issues regarding dual credit and Advanced Placement high school science courses could be mitigated via a flipped classroom instructional model. The need for advanced high school courses will be examined initially, followed by an analysis of advanced science courses and the reform they are experiencing. Finally, it will conclude with an explanation of flipped classes as well as how they may be a solution to the reform challenges teachers are experiencing as they seek to incorporate more inquiry-based activities.


Flipped classroom Advanced science courses AP science Dual credit 


  1. Adelman C (2006) The toolbox revisted: paths to degree completion from high school through college. U. S. Department of Education, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen D (2010) A comprehensive literature review and bibliography. CUNY Collaborative Programs, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen D, Dadgar M (2012) Does dual enrollment increase students’ success in college? Evidence from a quasi-experimental analysis of dual enrollment in New York City. New Dir High Educ 158:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. An BP (2013a) The impact of dual enrollment on college degree attainment: do low-SES students benefit? Educ Eval Policy Anal 35(1):57–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. An BP (2013b) The influence of dual enrollment on academic performance and college readiness: differences by socioeconomic status. Res High Educ 54(4):407–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrews H (2001) The dual-credit phenomenon! challenging secondary school students across 50 states. New Forums Press, StillwaterGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrews H, Barnett E (2002) Dual credit/enrollment in Illinois a status report. Office of Community College Research and Leadership, Champaign. Retrieved from
  8. Austin-King K, Lee PN, Little JA, Nathan J (2012) Progress and possibilities: trends in public high school student participation with Minnesota’s Dual Credit Programs 2006–2011. Center for School Change at Macalester College, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  9. Bailey T, Karp MM (2003) Promoting college access and success: a review of credit- based transition programs. Office of Vocational and Adult Education, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergmann J, Sams A (2008) Remixing chemistry class: two Colorado teachers make vodcasts of their lectures to free up class time for hands-on activities. Learn Lead Technol 36:22–27Google Scholar
  11. Berrett D (2012) How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. Chron High Educ. Retrieved from
  12. Bishop J, Verleger M (2013) Testing the flipped classroom with model-eliciting activities and video lectures in a mid-level undergraduate engineering course. In: Frontiers in education conference. IEEE, Oklahoma City, OK, pp 161–163Google Scholar
  13. Boindala PS, Brewley DN, Sinclair J, Erickson K (2013) The nuts and bolts of planning a “flipped” classroom in higher education. In: 33rd annual conference lilly conference on college and university teaching & learning. International Teaching Learning Cooperative, LLC, Oxford. Retrieved from
  14. Bound J, Lovenheim M, Turner S (2010) Why have college completion rates declined? An analysis of changing student preparation and collegiate resources. J Appl Econ 2(3):129–157Google Scholar
  15. Bragg D, Kim E, Barnett E (2006) Creating access and success: academic pathways reaching underserved students. New Dir Commun Coll 135:5–19Google Scholar
  16. Breslyn W, McGinnis JR (2012) A comparison of exemplary biology, chemistry, earth science, and physics teachers’ conceptions and enactment of inquiry. Sci Educ 96(1):48–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bryan RR, Glynn SM, Kittleson JM (2011) Motivation, achievement, and Advanced Placement intent of high school students learning science. Sci Educ 95(6):1049–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burns H, Lewis B (2000) Dual-enrolled students’ perceptions of the effect of classroom environment on educational experience. Qual Rep 4(1 & 2). Retrieved from
  19. Casserly PL (1986) Advanced Placement revisited. College Entrance Examination Board, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Cold SJ (2013) Partially flipped: experiences using POGIL. 14th annual ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education. Association for Computing Machinery, Orlando, pp 133–134Google Scholar
  21. Conley D (2005) College knowledge: what it really takes for students to succeed and what we can do to get them ready. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  22. Cooper M, Klymkowsky M (2013) Chemistry, life, the universe, and everything: a new approach to general chemistry, and a model for curriculum reform. J Chem Educ 90(9):1116–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crouse J, Allen J (2014) College course grades for dual enrollment students. Commun Coll J Res Pract 38(6):494–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Curry W, MacDonald W, Morgan R (1999) The Advanced Placement program: access to excellence. J Second Gift Educ 11(1):17–22Google Scholar
  25. D’Amico MM, Morgan GB, Robertson S, Rivers HE (2013) Dual enrollment variables and college student persistence. Commun Coll J Res Pract 37(10):769–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Day J, Foley J (2006) Evaluating a web lecture intervention in a human–computer interaction course. IEEE Trans Educ 49(4):420–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Derting TL, Ebert-May D (2010) Learner-centered inquiry in undergraduate biology: positive relationships with long-term student achievement. CBE-Life Sci Educ 9(4):462–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Deslauriers L, Schelew E, Wieman C (2011) Improving learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science 332(6031):862–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dougherty C, Mellor L, Jian S (2006) The relationship between Advanced Placement and college graduation. National Center for Education Assessment 2005 AP Study Series, Report 1Google Scholar
  30. Dove A (2013) Students’ perceptions of learning in a flipped statistics class. In: McBride R, Searson M (eds) Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2013. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA, pp 393–398. Retrieved May 20, 2015, from
  31. Dove A (2014) Examining the influence of a flipped mathematics classroom on achievement. In: Conference on higher education pedagogy. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, pp 251–252. Retrieved from
  32. Drummond C (2012) Teaching college geology in high school: the concurrent challenges and opportunities of dual credit programs to departments of geology. Geological Society of America Annual Meeting. 44. The Geolgical Society of America, Charlotte, p 308Google Scholar
  33. Drummond C (2013) Building and managing relationships with secondary schools through dual-credit collaborations. 125th anniversary annual meeting & expo. 45. Geological Society of America, Denver, p 431. Retrieved from
  34. Ebert J (2013) Fanning the flames of student interest: dual credit courses and recruitment of geoscience majors. 125th anniversary of geological society of America. 45. The Geological Society of America, Denver, p 432. Retrieved from
  35. Edwards L, Hughes KL, Weisberg A (2011) Different approaches to dual enrollment: understanding program features and their implications. Community College Research Center, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Eimers M, Mullen R (2003) Dual credit and advanced placement: do they help prepare students for success in college. 2002 MidAIR and 2003 AIR conference. Association for Institutional Research, TampaGoogle Scholar
  37. Ermeling B (2010) Tracing the effects of teacher inquiry on classroom practice. Teach Teach Educ 26(3):377–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fielding R (2012) Research supports value of updated school facilities. Educ Can 52(5). Retrieved from
  39. Findlay-Thompson S, Mombourquette P (2013) Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Global conference on business & finance. 8. The Institute for Business & Finance Research, Las Vegas, p 138Google Scholar
  40. Flumerfelt S, Green G (2013) Using lean in the flipped classroom for at risk students. Educ Technol Soc 16(1):356–366Google Scholar
  41. Fontenot J (2003) Dual credit: raising the bar or lowering the standard?. Office of Community College Research and Leadership, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  42. Fryenberg M (2012) Flipping excel. In: Proceedings of the information systems educators conference, vol 29. Education Special Interest Group of the AITP, New Orleans, pp 63–73. Retrieved from
  43. Ganeshananthan VV (2000) AP program faces new criticism over its testing standards. Chron High Educ 46(45):45–46Google Scholar
  44. Gray-Wilson S (2013) The flipped class: a method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. Teach Psychol 40(3):193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Harris RJ, Stovall ST (2013) Online dual credit mathematics for rural schools. Probl Resour Issues Math Undergrad Stud 23(5):434–440Google Scholar
  46. Hebel S (1999) AP courses are new target in struggle over access to college in California. Chron High Educ 46(14):32–34Google Scholar
  47. Heckman JJ, LaFontaine PA (2008) The declining American High School Graduation Rate: evidence, sources, and consequences. The National Bureau if Economic Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Henry M (1990) A skill sequence for honors class in high school social studies. Soc Educ 54(1):46Google Scholar
  49. Horn M (2013) The transformational potential of flipped classrooms. Educ Next 13(3):78–79Google Scholar
  50. Houston M, Lin L (2012) Humanizing the classroom by flipping the homework versus lecture equation. Society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2012. AACE, Chesapeake, pp 1177–1182Google Scholar
  51. International Baccalaureate Organization (n.d.) About the International Baccalaureate. Retrieved February 5, 2014, from
  52. Jackson CK (2010) A little now for a lot later: a look at a Texas advanced placement incentive program. J Hum Resour 45(3):591–639Google Scholar
  53. Johnson TE, Brophy M (2006) Dual enrollment: measuring factors for rural high school student participation. Rural Educ 28(1):25–32Google Scholar
  54. Jones S (2014) Student participation in dual enrollment and college success. Commun Coll J Res Pract 38(1):24–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kachka P (2012) Understanding the flipped classroom: part 2. Faculty Focus. Retrieved from
  56. Karp MM, Bailey T, Hughes K, Fermin B (2005) State dual enrollment policies: addressing access and quality report. Community College Research Center, New York. Retrieved from
  57. Lacey T (2010) Access, rigor, and revenue in the history of the advanced placement program. In: Sadler P, Sonnert G, Tai R, Klopfenstein K (eds) AP: a critical examination of the advanced placement program. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, pp 17–48Google Scholar
  58. Lage MJ, Platt G, Treglia M (2000) Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. J Econ Educ 31(1):30–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Love B, Hodge A, Grandgenett N, Swift AW (2013) Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. Retrieved from
  60. Margulieux L, MrCracken WM, Bujak KR, Majerich D (2014) Hybrid, blended, flipped, and inverted: defining terms in a two dimensional taxonomy. Hawaii International Conference on Education (HICE). Honolulu, HI. Retrieved from
  61. Mason GS, Shuman TR, Cook KE (2013) Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Trans Educ 56(4):430–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mattern K, Shaw E, Xiong Y-H (2009) The relationship between AP exam performance and college outcomes. College Board, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. McKillip ME, Rawls A (2013) A closer examination of the academic benefits of AP. J Educ Res 4:305–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Moss P, Tolly C (2003) Stories employers tell: race, skill, and hiring in America. Russell Sage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. National Center for Education Statistics (2013) The Condition of Education 2013. U.S. Department of Education, Washington DC. Retrieved from National Center for Education Statistics:
  66. National Research Council (1998) Every child a scientist: achieving scientific literacy for all. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  67. National Research Council (1999) How people learn: brain, mind, experience, school. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  68. National Research Council (2000) Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: a guide for teaching and learning. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  69. National Research Council (2002) Learning and understanding: improving advanced study of mathematics and science in U.S. High Schools. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  70. Nugent S, Karnes F (2002) The advanced placement program and the international baccalaureate programme: a history and update. Gift Child Today 25(1):30–39Google Scholar
  71. Parker W, Mosborg S, Bransford J, Vye N, Wilkerson J, Abbott R (2011) Rethinking advanced high school coursework: tackling the depth/breadth tension in the AP US Government and Politics course. J Curric Stud 43(4):533–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Parker W, Lo J, Yeo AJ, Valencia SW, Nguyen D, Abbott RD, Vye NJ (2013) Beyond breadth-speed-test: toward deeper knowing and engagement in an advanced placement course. Am Educ Res J 50(6):1424–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pierce R (2013) Student performance in a flipped class module. In: Society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2013. AACE, Chesapeake, pp 942–954Google Scholar
  74. Rushton GT (2012) Improving high school chemistry teaching via the “Trickle Up” effect: a perspective on the new AP chemistry curriculum framework. J Chem Educ 89(6):692–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Russo F (2000) Beyond advanced placement. Village Voice 45(15):90–91Google Scholar
  76. Santoli SP (2002) Is there an advanced placement advantage? Am Second Educ 30(3):23–35Google Scholar
  77. Schneider J (2011) Excellence for all. Vanderbilt University Press, NashvilleGoogle Scholar
  78. Scott T, Tolson H, Lee Y-H (2010) Assessment of advanced placement participation and university academic success in the first semester: controlling for selected high school academic abilities. J Coll Admiss 208:26–30Google Scholar
  79. Smith D (2007) Why expand dual-credit programs? Commun Coll J Res Pract 31(5):371–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stieff M (2011) Improving representational competence using molecular simulations embedded in inquiry activities. J Res Sci Teach 48(10):1137–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Teo TW, Osborne M (2012) Using symbolic interactionism to analyze a specialized STEM high school teacher’s experience in curriculum reform. Cult Sci Edu 7(3):541–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. The College Board (2012) Chemistry course description: effective fall 2012. College Board, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  83. The College Board (2014a) AP biology lab manual resource center. Retrieved February 6, 2014, from AP Central:
  84. The College Board (2014b) AP central course descriptions. Retrieved February 5, 2014, from College Board:
  85. The College Board (2014c) AP Physics 1 and AP Physics 2. Retrieved February 6, 2014, from Advances in AP:
  86. The College Board (2014d) How to earn credit for your scores. Retrieved February 5, 2014, from AP Students:
  87. The College Board (2014e) Put AP to work for you. Retrieved February 5, 2014, from The College Board:
  88. Tucker B (2012) The flipped classroom: online instruction at home frees class time for learning. Educ Next Winter 12(1):82–83Google Scholar
  89. Tune JD, Sturek M, Basile DP (2013) Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 37(4):316–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013) Employment projections, 19 December 2013. Retrieved February 5, 2014, from United States Department of Labor:
  91. Viadero D (2000) Study suggests fewer students receive ap credit. Educ Week 79(42):5Google Scholar
  92. Wagner D, Laforge P, Cripps D (2013) Lecture material retention: a first trial report on flipped classroom strategies in electronic systems engineering at the University of Regina. Canadian Engineering Education Association, pp 1–5. Montreal, QCGoogle Scholar
  93. Watt K, Huerta J, Alkan E (2011) Identifying predictors of college success through an examination of AVID graduates’ college preparatory achievements. J Hisp High Educ 10(2):120–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. White J, Hopkins R III, Shockley D (2014) Gaining insights from a case study of high school student performance in dual-credit college chemistry courses. J Chem Educ 91:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Willingham W, Morris M (1986) Four years later: a longitudinal study of advanced placement students in college. College Entrance Examination Board, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  96. Young RD, Slate JR, Moore GW, Barnes W (2013) Dual credit enrollment: a multiyear study of gender and ethnic differences. Urban Stud Res 2013:269685. doi: 10.1155/2013/269685 Google Scholar
  97. Zhai X, Leone M, Mieszala M, Hutson K, Rosenberg R, Carmichael D et al (2013) Promoting geoscience education through high school dual credit programs. 125th anniversary annual meeting & Expo. 45. The Geological Society of America, Denver, p 432Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Purdue University North CentralWestvilleUSA
  2. 2.Purdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations