Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Beginning Science Teachers’ Use of a Digital Video Annotation Tool to Promote Reflective Practices

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of teachers as reflective practitioners is a central concept in national guidelines for teacher preparation and induction (National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education 2008). The Teacher Induction Network (TIN) supports the development of reflective practice for beginning secondary science teachers through the creation of online “communities of practice” (Barab et al. in Inf Soc, 237–256, 2003), which have been shown to have positive impacts on teacher collaboration, communication, and reflection. Specifically, TIN integrated the use of asynchronous, video annotation as an affordance to directly facilitate teachers’ reflection on their classroom practices (Tripp and Rich in Teach Teach Educ 28(5):728–739, 2013). This study examines the use of video annotation as a tool for developing reflective practices for beginning secondary science teachers. Teachers were enrolled in an online teacher induction course designed to promote reflective practice and inquiry-based instruction. A modified version of the Learning to Notice Framework (Sherin and van Es in J Teach Educ 60(1):20–37, 2009) was used to classify teachers’ annotations on video of their teaching. Findings from the study include the tendency of teachers to focus on themselves in their annotations, as well as a preponderance of annotations focused on lower-level reflective practices of description and explanation. Suggestions for utilizing video annotation tools are discussed, as well as design features, which could be improved to further the development of richer annotations and deeper reflective practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acheson KA, Zigler CJ (1971) A comparison of two teacher training programs in higher cognitive questioning. Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen DW, Clark RJ (1967) Microteaching: its rationale. High Sch J 51:75–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab SA, MaKinster JG, Scheckler R (2003) Designing system dualities: characterizing a web-supported professional development community. Inf Soc 19(3):237–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg G, Renkl A, Sherin MG, Borko H, Seidel T (2013) Five research-based heuristics for using video in pre-service teacher education. J Educ Res Online 5(1):90–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy J (2003) Chapter 11 discussion. In: Brophy J (ed) Using video in teacher education (pp. 1–27). Elsevier Science, New York, pp 287–304

  • Brophy S, Klein S, Portsmore M, Rogers C (2008) Advancing engineering education in the P-12 classrooms. J Eng Educ 97(3):369–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan LA, Recesso A (2006) Promoting reflection with a web-based video analysis tool. J Comput Teach Educ 23(1):31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Clark VLP (2010) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson C (2007) Enhancing professional practice: a framework for teaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wever B, Schellens T, Valcke M, Van Keer H (2006) Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: a review. Comput Educ 46(1):6–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1933) How we think. Henrey Regney, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Donna JD (2009) Surviving and thriving as a new science teacher: exploring the role of comprehensive online induction (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser S (2001) From preparation to practice: designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teach Coll Rec 103:1013–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry L, Denton C, Kurz T (2008) Technologically-based mentoring provided to teachers: a synthesis of the literature. J Technol Teach Educ 16(3):339–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman P (2005) Research on pedagogical approaches. In: Cochran-Smith M, Zeichner KM (eds) Studying teacher education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 425–476

  • Hammer D (2000) Teacher inquiry. In: Minstrell J, van Zee E (eds) Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, pp 184–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosack B (2010) VideoANT: extending online video annotation beyond content delivery. TechTrends 54:45–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll R (2001) Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: an organizational analysis. Am Educ Res J 38(3):499–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll R (2012) Beginning teacher induction: what the data tell us. Phi Delta Kappan 93(8):47–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll R, Merrill E (2010) Who’s teaching our children? Educ Leadersh 67:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll R, Perda D (2006) What the data tell us about shortages of mathematics and science teachers. Paper presented at the national commission on teaching and America’s future meeting on mathematics and science teachers. November, 2006, Wingspread, WI

  • Ingersoll R, Strong M (2011) The impact of induction and mentoring for beginning teachers: a critical review of the research. Rev Educ Res 81(2):201–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe R, Moir E, Swanson E, Wheeler G (2006) EMentoring for student success. In: Dede C (ed) Online professional development for teachers: emerging models and methods. Havard Education Press, Cambridge, pp 89–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner P, Strijbos J-W, Kreijn K, Jelle Beers P (2004) Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educ Tech Res Dev 52(3):44–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong SC (2010) Using a web-enabled video system to support student–teachers’ self-reflection in teaching practice. Comput Educ 55(4):1772–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limbacher PC (1971) A study of the effects of microteaching experiences upon the classroom behavior of social studies student teachers. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft JA, Roehrig GH, Patterson NC (2003) Contrasting landscapes: a comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers’ practices and beliefs. J Res Sci Teach 40:77–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luft JA, Firestone JB, Wong SS, Ortega I, Adams K, Bang E (2011) Beginning secondary science teacher induction: a two-year mixed methods study. J Res Sci Teach 48(10):1199–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin S, Siry C (2012) Using video in science teacher education: an analysis of the utilization of video-based media. In: Fraser B, Tobin K, McRobbie C (eds) Using video in science teacher education: an analysis of the utilization of video-based media by teacher educators and researchers. Springer, Netherlands, pp 417–433

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh J (2012) How can video supported reflection enhance teachers’ professional development? Cult Sci Edu 7(1):137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (2008) NCATE unit standards. Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/Standards/NCATEUnitStandards/UnitStandardsinEffect2008/tabid/476/Default.aspx

  • Norman DA (1988) The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books, New York

  • Olivero JL (1965) The use of video recordings in teacher education. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 011 074)

  • Putnam RT, Borko H (2000) What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educ Res 29(1):4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich PJ, Hannafin MJ (2008) Decisions and reasons: examining pre-service teacher decision-making through video self-analysis. J Comput High Educ 20(1):62–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich PJ, Hannafin M (2009) Video annotation tools: technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. J Teach Educ 60:52–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich PJ, Trip T (2011) Ten essential questions educators should ask when using video annotation tools. TechTrends 55(6):16–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers C (2002) Defining reflection: another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teach Coll Rec 104(4):842–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehrig GH (2012) The Minnesota teacher induction network: providing continued support to our teacher candidates during their first year of teaching. National Science and Mathematics Teacher Imperative Conference, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehrig GH, Donna J, Billington BL, Hoelscher M  (in review) Design of online induction programs to promote reform-based science and mathematics teaching. Contemp Issue Technol Teach Educ

  • Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherin MG (2004) New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In: Brophy J (ed) Using video in teacher education. Elsevier Science, New York, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherin MG, van Es EA (2005) Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. J Technol Teach Educ 13(3):475–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherin MG, van Es EA (2009) Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. J Teach Educ 60(1):20–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TM, Ingersoll RM (2004) What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? Am Educ Res J 41(3):681–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos JW, Martens RL, Prins FJ, Jochems WMG (2006) Content analysis: what are they talking about? Comput Educ 46(1):29–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Teacher Education Accreditation Council (2008) Accreditation goal and principles. Retrieved from http://www.teac.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/accreditation-framework.pdf

  • Tripp TR, Rich PJ (2013) The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teach Teach Educ 28(5):728–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Es EA, Sherin MG (2002) Learning to notice: scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. J Technol Teach Educ 10(4):571–596

    Google Scholar 

  • van Es EA, Sherin MG (2008) Mathematics teachers’ ‘‘learning to notice’’ in the context of a video club. Teach Teach Educ 24:244–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wopereis I, Sloep P, Poortman S (2010) Weblogs as instruments for reflection on action in teacher education. Interact Learn Environ 18(3):245–261

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was made possible by National Science Foundation grant 0833250. The findings, conclusions, and opinions herein represent the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the view of personnel affiliated with the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin McFadden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McFadden, J., Ellis, J., Anwar, T. et al. Beginning Science Teachers’ Use of a Digital Video Annotation Tool to Promote Reflective Practices. J Sci Educ Technol 23, 458–470 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9476-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9476-2

Keywords

Navigation