Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 278–286 | Cite as

Engaging Earth- and Environmental-Science Undergraduates Through Weather Discussions and an eLearning Weather Forecasting Contest

  • David M. Schultz
  • Stuart Anderson
  • Ryo Seo-Zindy


For students who major in meteorology, engaging in weather forecasting can motivate learning, develop critical-thinking skills, improve their written communication, and yield better forecasts. Whether such advances apply to students who are not meteorology majors has been less demonstrated. To test this idea, a weather discussion and an eLearning weather forecasting contest were devised for a meteorology course taken by third-year undergraduate earth- and environmental-science students. The discussion consisted of using the recent, present, and future weather to amplify the topics of the week’s lectures. Then, students forecasted the next day’s high temperature and the probability of precipitation for Woodford, the closest official observing site to Manchester, UK. The contest ran for 10 weeks, and the students received credit for participation. The top students at the end of the contest received bonus points on their final grade. A Web-based forecast contest application was developed to register the students, receive their forecasts, and calculate weekly standings. Students who were successful in the forecast contest were not necessarily those who achieved the highest scores on the tests, demonstrating that the contest was possibly testing different skills than traditional learning. Student evaluations indicate that the weather discussion and contest were reasonably successful in engaging students to learn about the weather outside of the classroom, synthesize their knowledge from the lectures, and improve their practical understanding of the weather. Therefore, students taking a meteorology class, but not majoring in meteorology, can derive academic benefits from weather discussions and forecast contests. Nevertheless, student evaluations also indicate that better integration of the lectures, weather discussions, and the forecasting contests is necessary.


Meteorology Forecasting Education Contest Evaluation 



We thank Prof. Dan Keyser of the State University of New York at Albany for the inspiration to hold a weather forecasting contest for non-meteorology majors, the students for their participation in the contest and their feedback, eLearning Manager Alison Hamilton for her support of this project, and the anonymous reviewer for prompt and constructive feedback that improved the manuscript.


  1. Bals-Elsholz TM, Atallah EH, Bosart LF, Wasula TA, Cempa MJ, Lupo AR (2001) The wintertime Southern Hemisphere split jet: structure, variability, and evolution. J Clim 14:4191–4215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bond NA, Mass CF (2009) Development of skill by students enrolled in a weather forecasting laboratory. Weather Forecast 24:1141–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosart LF (1975) SUNYA experimental results in forecasting daily temperature and precipitation. Mon Weather Rev 103:1013–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosart LF (1983) An update on trends in skill of daily forecasts of temperature and precipitation at the State University of New York at Albany. Bull Am Meteor Soc 64:346–354Google Scholar
  5. Bosart LF, Landin MG (1994) An assessment of thunderstorm probability forecasting skill. Weather Forecast 9:522–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cervato C, Gallus W, Boysen P, Larsen M (2009) Today’s forecast: higher thinking with a chance of conceptual growth. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 90(20):174. doi: 10.1029/2009EO200002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Constabile MF, De Marsico M, Lanzilotti R, Plantamura VL, Roselli T (2005) On the usability evaluation of e-Learning applications. In: Proceedings of 38th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 3–6 January 2005, IEEE, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  8. Decker SG (2012) Experiences with a probabilistic forecasting game for meteorology students. Preprints, 21st symposium on education, New Orleans, LA, Am Meteor Soc 3.4Google Scholar
  9. Gedzelman SD (1978) Forecasting skill of beginners. Bull Am Meteor Soc 59:1305–1309Google Scholar
  10. Gyakum JR (1986) Experiments in temperature and precipitation forecasting for Illinois. Weather Forecast 1:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamill TM, Wilks DS (1995) A probabilistic forecast contest and the difficulty in assessing short-range forecast uncertainty. Weather Forecast 10:620–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harrington JA, Cerveny RS, Hobgood JS (1991) Competitive learning experiences: the role of weather forecasting contests in geography programs. J Geography 90(1):27–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hilliker J (2008) Assessment of a weather forecasting contest in multi-leveled meteorology classes. J Geoscience Educ 56(2):160–165Google Scholar
  14. Knox JA, Ackerman SA (2005) What do introductory meteorology students want to learn? Bull Am Meteor Soc 86:1431–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Market PS (2006) The impact of writing area forecast discussions on student forecaster performance. Weather Forecast 21:104–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roebber PJ (2005) Bridging the gap between theory and applications: an inquiry into atmospheric science teaching. Bull Am Meteor Soc 86:507–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roebber PJ, Bosart LF (1996) The contributions of education and experience to forecast skill. Weather Forecast 11:21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roebber PJ, Bosart LF, Forbes GS (1996) Does distance from the forecast site affect skill? Weather Forecast 11:582–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roebber PJ, Westendorf M, Meadows GR (2010) Innovative weather: a new strategy for student, university, and community relationships. Bull Am Meteor Soc 91:877–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sanders F (1963) On subjective probability forecasting. J Appl Meteor 2:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sanders F (1967) The verification of probability forecasts. J Appl Meteor 6:756–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sanders F (1973) Skill in forecasting daily temperature and precipitation: some experimental results. Bull Am Meteor Soc 54:1171–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sanders F (1979) Trends in skill of daily forecasts of temperature and precipitation, 1966–78. Bull Am Meteor Soc 60:763–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sanders F (1986) Trends in skill of Boston forecasts made at MIT, 1966–84. Bull Am Meteor Soc 67:170–176Google Scholar
  25. Schultz DM, Bracken WE, Bosart LF, Hakim GJ, Bedrick MA, Dickinson MJ, Tyle KR (1997) The 1993 superstorm cold surge: frontal structure, gap flow, and tropical impact. Mon Wea Rev 125:5–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Seuss EJ, Cervato C, Gallus WA, Jr, Hobbs J (2011) Weather forecasting as a learning tool in a large service course: does practice make perfect? Preprints, 20th symposium on education, American Meteorological Society, 6 pp. Available online at et al. 2010 extended abstract.pdf
  27. Skeeter BR (2006) Geography department weather forecasting contests in the 21st Century. J Geography 105(3):129–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Schultz
    • 1
  • Stuart Anderson
    • 2
  • Ryo Seo-Zindy
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Atmospheric Science, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.eLearning Team, Faculty of Engineering and Physical SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations