The Cosmic Ray Observatory Project: Results of a Summer High-School Student, Teacher, University Scientist Partnership Using a Capstone Research Experience
This paper reports results from evaluation of the Cosmic Ray Observatory Project (CROP), a student, teacher, scientist partnership to engage high-school students and teachers in school based cosmic ray research. Specifically, this study examined whether an intensive summer workshop experience could effectively prepare teacher—student teams to engage in cutting edge high-energy physics research. Results showed that teachers and students could acquire enough knowledge about cosmic ray physics and self-efficacy for conducting cosmic ray research during a summer workshop to be full participants in an SSP conducting research in their schools, and a capstone anchoring approach using an authentic research activity was effective for motivating student engagement in didactic classroom learning. CROP demonstrated “proof of concept” that setting up cosmic ray detector arrays in schools run by teachers and students was feasible, but found that set-up and operation in a high-school was technically difficult.
KeywordsStudent, teacher, scientist partnership Summer research experience Science education Anchored instruction
This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (Grant #9911855).
- Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. W. H. Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18(1):32–42Google Scholar
- Cappelleri DJ, Keller JF, Kientz T, Szczesniak P, Kumar V (2007) SAAST robotics—an intensive three week robotics program for high school students. In: Proceedings of ASME 2007 international design engineering technical conferences & computer and information in engineering conference. ASME, pp 1–9Google Scholar
- Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1990) Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educ Res 19:2–10Google Scholar
- Collins A (2006) Cognitive apprenticeship. In: Sawyer RK (ed) The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 47–60Google Scholar
- National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Pajares F (2008) Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In: Schunk DH, Zimmerman BJ (eds) Motivation and self-regulated learning: theory, research, and applications. Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp 111–140Google Scholar
- Zech L, Vye NJ, Bransford JD, Goldman SR, Barron BJ, Schwartz DL, Kisst-Hackett R, Mayfield-Stewart C, The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1998) An introduction to geometry through anchored instruction. In: Lehrer R, Chazan D (eds) Designing learning environments for developing understand of geometry and space. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 439–463Google Scholar