Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 74–84 | Cite as

Closing the Gap: Inquiry in Research and the Secondary Science Classroom



Teaching students how to conduct authentic scientific inquiry is an essential aspect of recent science education reform efforts. Our National Science Foundation-funded GK-12 program paired science graduate students—fellows—with secondary science teachers in order to enhance inquiry-based instruction. This research examined the roles of the fellows, teachers, and school culture in the implementation of inquiry and the fellows’ conceptions of classroom inquiry versus that in their own research. Qualitative data were collected for two academic years. Overall, the classrooms shifted toward a more inquiry-oriented approach over the academic year. Several aspects of school culture influenced inquiry implementation. Fellows described their research as similar in overall structure but less constrained by known concepts, less guided by mentors, and more in-depth than that of secondary school students. The teacher-fellow scientist partnership is a potentially effective professional development model to create positive and lasting change within the science classroom.


Inquiry-based instruction Levels of inquiry Inquiry model Science graduate student-secondary school teacher partnerships Secondary school science Professional development 


  1. Abrams ED, Southerland SA, Evans CA (2008) Inquiry in the classroom: identifying necessary components of a useful definition. In: Abrams ED, Southerland SA (eds) Integrating inquiry in the science classroom: realities and opportunities. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, pp x–xiii, 265Google Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989) Project 2061: science for all Americans. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993) Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1998) Blueprint for reform: project 2061. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson RD (2007) Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In: Abell SK, Lederman NG (eds) Handbook of research on science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, New Jersey, pp 807–830Google Scholar
  6. Bell LR, Smetana L, Binns I (2005) Simplifying inquiry instruction: assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. Sci Teach 72(7):30–33Google Scholar
  7. Cavana GR, Leonard WH (1985) Extending discretion in the high school science curricula. Sci Educ 69(5):593–603. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730690502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiappetta EL, Adams AD (2004) Inquiry-based instruction: understanding how content and process go hand-in-hand with school science. Sci Teach 71(2):46–50Google Scholar
  9. Crawford B (2000) Embracing the essence of inquiry: new roles for science teachers. J Res Sci Teach 37(9):916–937. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<916::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deters K (2004) Inquiry in the chemistry classroom: tips for implementing inquiry-based chemistry labs. Sci Teach 71(10):42–45Google Scholar
  11. Eick C, Meadows L, Balkcom R (2005) Breaking into inquiry: scaffolding supports beginning efforts to implement inquiry in the classroom. Sci Teach 72(7):49–53Google Scholar
  12. Erickson F (1986) Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: Wittrock MC (ed) Handbook of research on teaching. Macmillan, New York, pp 119–161Google Scholar
  13. McComas W (2005) Laboratory instruction in the service of science teaching and learning. Sci Teach 72(7):24–29Google Scholar
  14. National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. National Research Council (2000) Inquiry and the national science education standards: a guide for teaching and learning. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Rehorek SJ (2004) Inquiry-based teaching: an example of descriptive science in action. Am Biol Teach 66(7):493–499. doi: 10.1662/0002-7685(2004)066[0493:IT]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sampson V (2004) The science management observation protocol: using structured observations to improve teachers’ management of inquiry-based classrooms. Sci Teach 71(10):30–33Google Scholar
  18. Singer SR, Hilton ML, Schwiengruber HA (eds) (2005) America’s lab report: investigations in school science. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Sternadel L (2004) Inquiry and developing interpretations from evidence. Sci Teach 71(4):38–41Google Scholar
  20. Thompson SL, Collins A, Metzgar V, Joeston M, Shepherd V (2002a) Exploring graduate-level scientists’ participation in a sustained K-12 teaching collaboration. Sch Sci Math 102(6):254–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thompson SL, Metzgar V, Collins A, Joeston M, Shepherd V (2002b) Examining the influence of a graduate teaching fellows program on teachers in grade 7–12. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Charlotte, NC, 10–13 JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  22. Thompson SL (2003) Development of a framework to measure science teachers’ inquiry perceptions and practices. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, St. Louis, MO, 29 January–2 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  23. Vygotsky LS (1979) The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. In: Rieber RW, Wollock J (eds) Problems of general psychology, vol 1. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Windschitl M (2004) Folk theories of “inquiry:” how preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. J Res Sci Teach 41(5):481–512. doi: 10.1002/tea.20010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations