Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 511–521 | Cite as

Supporting Teachers’ Use of Technology in Science Instruction Through Professional Development: A Literature Review

  • Tara E. Higgins
  • Michele W. Spitulnik


Professional development is critical in supporting teachers’ use of technological tools in classrooms. This review of empirical research synthesizes the effective elements of professional development programs that support science teachers in learning about technology integration. Studies are examined that explore how professional development supports technology use within inquiry-based and traditional science instruction. Implications for future research are discussed in four areas: understanding and building on teachers’ beliefs about science and technology; supporting teacher learning by supporting teachers’ examination of students’ work; using technology to support teacher communities and social networks; and sustaining teachers’ learning beyond formal professional development programs.


Professional development Educational technology Science teachers Literature review 



This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 0455877, 9805420, 0128062, 0311835, and 0334199. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.


  1. Ball DL, Cohen DK (1999) Developing practice, developing practitioners: toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In: Sykes G, Darling-Hammond L (eds) Teaching as the learning profession: handbook of policy and practice. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, pp 3–32Google Scholar
  2. Barab SA, Kling R, Gray JH (eds) (2004) Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker HJ (1994) How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. J Res Comput Educ 26(3):291–321Google Scholar
  4. Borko H, Mayfield V, Marion S, Flexer R, Cumbo K (1997) Teachers’ developing ideas and practices about mathematics performance assessment: successes, stumbling blocks, and implications for professional development. Teach Teach Educ 13(3):259–278. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00024-8 Google Scholar
  5. Cohen DK, Hill HC (2000) Instructional policy and classroom performance: the mathematics reform in California. Teach Coll Rec 102(2):294–343. doi: 10.1111/0161-4681.00057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cuban L (2001) Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis EA (2003) Knowledge integration in science teaching: analyzing teachers’ knowledge development. Res Sci Educ 34:21–53. doi: 10.1023/B:RISE.0000021034.01508.b8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fishman BJ, Marx RW, Best S, Tal RT (2003) Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teach Teach Educ 19:643–658. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00059-3 Google Scholar
  9. Fullan M, Smith G (1999) Technology and the problem of change. Retrieved November 3, 2005.
  10. Garet MS, Porter AC, Desimone L, Birman BF, Yoon KS (2001) What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. Am Educ Res J 38(4):915–945. doi: 10.3102/00028312038004915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grossman P, Wineburg S, Woolworth S (2001) Toward a theory of teacher community. Teach Coll Rec 103(6):942–1012. doi: 10.1111/0161-4681.00140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guskey TR (1985) The effects of staff development on teachers’ perceptions about effective teaching. J Educ Res 78(6):378–381Google Scholar
  13. Guskey TR (1986) Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educ Res 15(5):5–12Google Scholar
  14. Hawley WD, Valli L (1999) The essentials of effective professional development: a new consensus. In: Sykes G, Darling-Hammond L (eds) Teaching as the learning profession: handbook of policy and practice. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, pp 127–150Google Scholar
  15. Horn IS (2005) Learning on the job: a situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments. Cogn Instr 23(2):207–236. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2302_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kazemi E, Franke ML (2004) Teacher learning in mathematics: using student work to promote collective inquiry. J Math Teach Educ 7(3):203–235. doi: 10.1023/B:JMTE.0000033084.26326.19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Linn MC, Davis EA, Bell P (2004) Inquiry and technology. In: Linn MC, Davis E, Bell P (eds) Internet environments for science education. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 3–28Google Scholar
  18. Little JW (1984) Seductive images and organizational realities in professional development. Teach Coll Rec 86(1):84–102Google Scholar
  19. Mishra P, Koehler MJ (2006) Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teach Coll Rec 108(6):1017–1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Niederhauser DS, Stoddart T (2001) Teachers’ instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teach Teach Educ 17:15–31. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00036-6 Google Scholar
  21. Palincsar AS, Magnusson SJ, Marano N, Ford D, Brown N (1998) Designing a community of practice: principles and practices of the GIsML community. Teach Teach Educ 14(1):5–19. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00057-7 Google Scholar
  22. Pedersen JE, Yerrick RK (2000) Technology in science teacher education: survey of current uses and desired knowledge among science educators. J Sci Teach Educ 11(2):131–153. doi: 10.1023/A:1009468808876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Penuel WR, Fishman BJ, Yamaguchi R, Gallagher LP (2007) What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster implementation. Am Educ Res J 44(4):921–958. doi: 10.3102/0002831207308221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Richardson V (2003) The dilemmas of professional development. Phi Delta Kappan 84(5):401–406Google Scholar
  25. Singer J, Marx RW, Krajcik JS, Clay-Chambers J (2000) Constructing extended inquiry projects: curriculum materials for science education reform. Educ Psychol 35(3):165–178. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Songer NB, Lee H-S, Kam R (2002) Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: what are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? J Res Sci Teach 39(2):128–150. doi: 10.1002/tea.10013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams M, Linn MC, Ammon P, Gearhart M (2004) Learning to teach inquiry science in a technology-based environment: a case study. J Sci Educ Technol 13(2):189–206. doi: 10.1023/B:JOST.0000031258.17257.48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilson SM, Berne J (1999) Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: an examination of research on contemporary professional development. In: Aran-Nejad A, Pearson PD (eds) Review of research in education, vol 24. pp 173–209Google Scholar
  29. Windschitl M, Sahl K (2002) Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: the interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. Am Educ Res J 39(1):165–205. doi: 10.3102/00028312039001165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhao Y, Pugh K, Sheldon S, Byers JL (2002) Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teach Coll Rec 104(3):482–515. doi: 10.1111/1467-9620.00170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.OaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations