Skip to main content
Log in

Stimulus Sensitivity of a Spiking Neural Network Model

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some recent papers relate the criticality of complex systems to their maximal capacity of information processing. In the present paper, we consider high dimensional point processes, known as age-dependent Hawkes processes, which have been used to model spiking neural networks. Using mean-field approximation, the response of the network to a stimulus is computed and we provide a notion of stimulus sensitivity. It appears that the maximal sensitivity is achieved in the sub-critical regime, yet almost critical for a range of biologically relevant parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In fact, exponential convergence of the solution of the PDE system (1) to the unique solution of its stationary version (2) can be proved in the weak (\(\alpha <\alpha _{\mathrm{weak}}\)) and the strong (\(\alpha >\alpha _{\mathrm{strong}}\)) connectivity regime [20]. However, the result are not quantitative: \(\alpha _{\mathrm{weak}}\) and \(\alpha _{\mathrm{strong}}\) are unknown. We do not know how they compare to \(\alpha _{c}\).

  2. It is dimensionless since \(\mu \) is a frequency and \(\delta \) a duration.

  3. This can be proved thanks to the cluster representation of linear Hawkes processes [7] and similar results available on Galton–Watson trees.

  4. For all \(t\ge 0, u(t,\cdot )\) remains a probability density and so it is for \(u_{\infty }\).

References

  1. Arviv, O., Goldstein, A., Shriki, O.: Near-critical dynamics in stimulus-evoked activity of the human brain and its relation to spontaneous resting-state activity. J. Neurosci. 35(41), 13927–13942 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bak, P., Chen, K.: Self-organized criticality. Sci. Am. 264(1), 46–53 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beggs, J.M.: The criticality hypothesis: how local cortical networks might optimize information processing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 366(1864), 329–343 (2008)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Beggs, J.M., Plenz, D.: Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits. J. Neurosci. 23(35), 11167–11177 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cassandro, M., Galves, A., Löcherbach, E.: Information transmission and criticality in the contact Process. J. Stat. Phys. 168(6), 1180–1190 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-017-1854-3

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chevallier, J.: Mean-field limit of generalized Hawkes processes. Stoch. Process. Appl. 127(12), 3870–3912 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hawkes, A.G.: Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika 58(1), 83–90 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen, H.J.: Self-organized Criticality: Emergent Complex Behavior in Physical and Biological Systems, vol. 10. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kinouchi, O., Copelli, M.: Optimal dynamical range of excitable networks at criticality. Nat. Phys. 2(5), 348–351 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Larremore, D.B., Shew, W.L., Restrepo, J.G.: Predicting criticality and dynamic range in complex networks: effects of topology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106(5), 058101 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Malamud, B.D., Morein, G., Turcotte, D.L.: Forest fires: an example of self-organized critical behavior. Science 281(5384), 1840–1842 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nykter, M., Price, N.D., Aldana, M., Ramsey, S.A., Kauffman, S.A., Hood, L.E., Yli-Harja, O., Shmulevich, I.: Gene expression dynamics in the macrophage exhibit criticality. Proceed. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105(6), 1897–1900 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Onaga, T., Shinomoto, S.: Emergence of event cascades in inhomogeneous networks. Sci. Rep. 6, 33321 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33321

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reimer, I.C., Staude, B., Ehm, W., Rotter, S.: Modeling and analyzing higher-order correlations in non-poissonian spike trains. J. Neurosci. Methods 208(1), 18–33 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reynaud-Bouret, P., Roy, E.: Some non asymptotic tail estimates for Hawkes processes. Bull. Belgian Math. Soc.-Simon Stevin 13(5), 883–896 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Shew, W.L., Plenz, D.: The functional benefits of criticality in the cortex. Neuroscientist 19(1), 88–100 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shriki, O., Yellin, D.: Optimal information representation and criticality in an adaptive sensory recurrent neuronal network. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12(2), e1004698 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Valverde, S., Solé, R.V.: Self-organized critical traffic in parallel computer networks. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 312(3), 636–648 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Vanni, F., Luković, M., Grigolini, P.: Criticality and transmission of information in a swarm of cooperative units. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 078103 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.078103

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weng, Q.: General time elapsed neuron network model: well-posedness and strong connectivity regime. ArXiv e-prints (2015)

  21. Wilting, J., Priesemann, V.: Branching into the unknown: inferring collective dynamical states from subsampled systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.07035 (2016)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Eva Löcherbach for inspiring discussions on this topic. This research was supported by the project Labex MME-DII (ANR11-LBX-0023-01) and mainly conducted during the stay of the author at Université de Cergy-Pontoise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julien Chevallier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chevallier, J. Stimulus Sensitivity of a Spiking Neural Network Model. J Stat Phys 170, 800–808 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-017-1948-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-017-1948-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation