Studies of the Micellization of Cationic–Anionic Surfactant Systems in Water and Methanol–Water Mixed Solvents
Measurements of the conductance of binary mixtures of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide and sodium dodecylsulfate in pure water and in methanol–water mixed solvent media containing 0.10, 0.20, and 0.30 volume fractions of methanol at 308.15, 318.15, and 323.15 K are reported. The concentration of sodium dodecylsulfate varied from 0.001 to 0.04 mol·L−1 in the presence of ~5.0 × 10−4 mol·L−1 cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. The results showed a sharp increase in the conductance with increasing concentrations of the surfactant mixture. The conductance is found to increase with increasing temperature over the entire concentration range in pure water and in a given mixed solvent medium but is found to decrease with increasing methanol content in the solvent. Estimation of the pre-cmc (S 1) and post-cmc (S 2) slopes for the CTAB–SDS system, to calculate the critical micelle concentration, provides important insight regarding the solution behavior of the mixed surfactants. The critical micelle concentration (cmc) and degree of micellar dissociation (α) of sodium dodecylsulfate in the presence of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide increase in the methanol–water mixed solvent medium. Additionally, the values of cmc and α increase with increasing temperature. The thermodynamic functions for the micellization were calculated at various conditions.
KeywordsConductance Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide Sodium dodecylsulfate Critical micelle concentration Degree of micellar dissociation
This work was supported by a Research Grant for the fiscal year 2012/2013 of Nepal Academy of Science and Technology (NAST), Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal under Research Grant Program. This work was also supported by the grant from University Grants Commission, Nepal for some chemicals. The author is grateful to Professor Bijan Das, presently in the Department of Chemistry, Presidency University, Kolkata, India for valuable suggestions and discussions. The author sincerely thanks the Head of the Department of Chemistry, Mahendra Morang Adarsh Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Biratnagar, Nepal for providing the available research facilities to conduct this work.
- 2.Holmberg, K., Jönsson, B., Kronberg, B., Lindman, B.: Surfactants and Polymers in Aqueous Solution, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester (2003)Google Scholar
- 10.Panda, A.K., Possmayer, F., Petersen, N.O., Nag, K., Moulik, S.P.: Physico-chemical studies on mixed oppositely charged surfactants: their uses in the preparation of surfactant ion selective membrane and monolayer behavior at the air water interface. Colloid Surf A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 264, 106–113 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Ogino, K., Abe, M. (eds.): Mixed Surfactant Systems, Surfactant Science Series, vol. 46, pp. 317. Marcel Dekker, New York (1993)Google Scholar
- 18.Devinsky, P.M., Lacko, F.I.: Critical micelle concentration, ionization degree and micellisation energy of cationic dimeric (gemini) surfactants in aqueous solution and in mixed micelles with anionic surfactant. Acta Facult. Pharm. Univ. Comenianae 50, 119–131 (2003)Google Scholar
- 26.Mukerjee, P., Mysels, K.J.: Critical Micelle Concentration of Aqueous Surfactant Systems. National Bureau of Standards, Washington DC (1970)Google Scholar
- 27.Khan, A.M., Shah, S.S.: Determination of critical micelle concentration of sodium dodecylsulphate and effect of low concentration pyrene on its cmc using origin software. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 30, 186–191 (2008)Google Scholar
- 30.Jenkins, S.I.: Novel Aqueous Two-Phase Systems: Characterization and Applications in Chemical Separation. Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State University (2012)Google Scholar
- 52.Khan, A., Marques, E.: Catanionic Surfactants in Specialists Surfactants. Blackie Academic and Professional, pp. 37–76. Chapman and Hall, London (1997)Google Scholar
- 58.Dubey, N.: A conductometric study of interaction between sodium dodecyl sulfate and 1-propanol, 1-butanol 1-pentanol and 1-hexanol at different temperatures. J. Surface Sci. Technol. 24, 139–148 (2008)Google Scholar
- 59.Hiemenz, P.C., Rajagopalan, R.: Principles of Colloid and Surface Chemistry, pp. 335–404. Dekker, New York (1997)Google Scholar