Abstract
Employee empowerment is a flexible management concept. As in traditional scheduling, the employer is still in charge of assigning jobs to staff. However, employees are allowed to express their preferences for the jobs they want to do. The hope is that empowerment will improve morale, which will improve productivity. The challenge is to design such an empowerment scheduling system without undesirable outcomes.
In the proposed model, employees submit their preferences as “work plans”. The organizational goal and the employees’ work plans may not be in conflict. In such situations, win-win schedules can be generated without costing the organization. When there is a conflict, the organization is willing to give up a certain amount of its optimality (which is determined by the organization) in order to consider the employee’s work plans. The employer is in charge, and therefore jobs undesirable to any of the employees will still be done. A main consideration in empowerment is to make the employees feel that the system is fair. The proposed model maintains fairness by incorporating an automatic market-like mechanism that controls the violation cost of each employee’s request.
The model is applied to solve a workforce scheduling problem which involves scheduling a multi-skilled workforce to geographically dispersed tasks. Extensive computational experiments are conducted, which show that this model enables an organization to implement employee empowerment effectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behaviour on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945–955.
Alfares, H. (2004). Survey, categorization, and comparison of recent tour scheduling literature. Annals of Operation Research, 127, 145–175.
Alsheddy, A., & Tsang, E. P. K. (2010). Guided Pareto local search based frameworks for biobjective optimization. In The congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), Spain, Barcelona. New York: IEEE Press.
Azaiez, M. N., & Al Sharif, S.S. (2005). A 0–1 goal programming model for nurse scheduling. Computers & Operations Research, 32(3), 491–507.
Bailyn, L., Collins, R., & Song, Y. (2007). Self-scheduling for hospital nurses: an attempt and its difficulties. Journal of Nursing Management, 15(1), 72–77.
Baker, S. (1993). Applying simulated annealing to the workforce management problem (Technical report). British Telecom Laboratories.
Bard, J. F., & Purnomo, H. W. (2005). Preference scheduling for nurses using column generation. European Journal of Operational Research, 164(2), 510–534.
Bertels, S., & Fahle, T. (2006). A hybrid setup for a hybrid scenario: combining heuristics for the home health care problem. Computers & Operations Research, 33(10), 2866–2890.
Borenstein, Y., Shah, N., Tsang, E. P. K., Dorne, R., Alsheddy, A., & Voudouris, C. (2008). On the partitioning of dynamic scheduling problems—assigning technicians to areas. In Genetic and evolutionary computation conference 2008, USA.
Boutilier, C., Brafman, R. I., Domshlak, C., Hoos, H. H., & Poole, D. (2004). Preference-based constrained optimization with cp-nets. Computational Intelligence, 20(2), 137–157.
Burke, E. K., De Causmaecker, P., Petrovic, S., & Vanden Berghe, G. (2001). Fitness evaluation for nurse scheduling problems. In The congress on evolutionary computation (CEC2001) (pp. 1139–1146). New York: IEEE Press.
Burke, E. K., De Causmaecker, P., Vanden Berghe, G., & Van Landeghem, H. (2004). The state of the art of nurse rostering. Journal of Scheduling, 7(6), 441–499.
Claydon, T., & Doyle, M. (1996). Trusting me, trusting you? The ethics of employee empowerment. Personnel Review, 25, 13–25.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. The Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471–482.
Cowling, P., Colledge, N., Dahal, K., & Remde, S. (2006). The trade off between diversity and quality for multi-objective workforce scheduling. In Evolutionary computation in combinatorial optimization (pp. 13–24).
De Grano, M. L., Medeiros, D., & Eitel, D. (2009). Accommodating individual preferences in nurse scheduling via auctions and optimization. Health Care Management Science, 12(3), 228–242.
Dimitriades, Z. S. (2001). Empowerment in total quality: Designing and implementing effective employee decision-making strategies. Quality Management Journal, 8(2), 19–28.
Eveborn, P., & Rönnqvist, M. (2004). Scheduler—a system for staff planning. Annals of Operation Research, 128(1), 21–45.
Feillet, D., Dejax, P., & Gendreau, M. (2005). Traveling salesman problems with profits. Transportation Science, 39(2), 188–205.
Glover, F., & Kochenberger, G. (2003). International series in operations research & management science. Handbook of metaheuristics. Berlin: Springer.
Greasley, K., Bryman, A., Dainty, A., Price, A., Soetanto, R., & King, N. (2005). Employee perceptions of empowerment. Employee Relations, 27, 354–368.
Hambleton, R. S. (1982). The prospect award 1981: a manpower planning model for mobile repairmen. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 33(7), 621–627.
Hung, R. (2002). A note on nurse self-scheduling. Nursing Economics, 20(1), 37–39.
Lever, J., Wallace, M., & Richards, B. (1995). Constraint logic programming for scheduling and planning. British Telecom Technology Journal, 13(1), 73–80.
Love, R., & Hoey, J. (1990). Management science improves fast-food operations. Interfaces, 20(2), 21–29.
Miller, M. L. (1984). Implementing self-scheduling. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 14(3), 33–36.
Muller, C., Magill, E., & Smith, D. (1993). Distributed genetic algorithms for resource allocation (Technical report). Strathclyde University.
Naveh, Y., Richter, Y., Altshuler, Y., Gresh, D. L., & Connors, D. P. (2007). Workforce optimization: identification and assignment of professional workers using constraint programming. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 51(3), 263–279.
Randhawa, S. U., & Sitompul, D. (1993). A heuristic-based computerized nurse scheduling system. Computers & Operations Research, 20(9), 837–844.
Silver, S., Randolph, W. A., & Seibert, S. (2006). Implementing and sustaining empowerment: lessons learned from comparison of a for-profit and a nonprofit organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(1), 47–58.
Tang, H., Miller-Hooks, E., & Tomastik, R. (2007). Scheduling technicians for planned maintenance of geographically distributed equipment. Transportation Research, Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, 43(5), 591–609.
Teahan, B. (1998). Implementation of a self-scheduling system: a solution to more than just schedules! Journal of Nursing Management, 6(6), 361–368. [Erratum: Journal of Nursing Management, 7(1), 65, 1999].
Tsang, E. P. K. (1993). Foundations of constraint satisfaction. San Diego: Academic Press.
Tsang, E. P. K., & Voudouris, C. (1997). Fast local search and guided local search and their application to British telecom’s workforce scheduling problem. Operations Research Letters, 20(3), 119–127.
Tsang, E. P. K., Gosling, T., Virginas, B., Voudouris, C., & Owusu, G. (2005). Retractable contract network for distributed scheduling. In 2nd multidisciplinary international conference on scheduling: theory & applications (MISTA) (pp. 485–500), New York.
Tsang, E. P. K., Gosling, T., Virginas, B., Voudouris, C., Owusu, G., & Liu, W. (2008a). Retractable contract network for empowerment in workforce scheduling. Multiagent and Grid Systems, 4(1), 25–44.
Tsang, E. P. K., Virginas, B., Gosling, T., & Liu, W. (2008b). Multi-agent systems for staff empowerment. In Service chain management (pp. 263–272).
Ursu, M., Virginas, B., Owusu, G., & Voudouris, C. (2005). Distributed resource allocation via local choices: A case study of workforce allocation. International Journal of Knowledge Based Intelligent Systems Engineering, 9(4), 293–301.
Voudouris, C., & Tsang, E. P. K. (2003). Guided local search. In F. Glover (Ed.), Handbook of metaheuristics (pp. 185–218). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Voudouris, C., Owusu, G., Dorne, R., & Lesaint, D. (2008). Service chain management: technology innovation for the service business. Berlin: Springer.
Wilkinson, A. (1998). Empowerment: theory and practice. Personnel Review, 27, 40–56.
Yang, R. (1996). Solving a workforce management problem with constraint programming. In The 2nd international conference on the practical application of constraint technology (pp. 373–387).
Yura, K. (1994). Production scheduling to satisfy worker’s preferences for days off and overtime under due-date constraints. International Journal of Production Economics, 33, 265–270.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alsheddy, A., Tsang, E.P.K. Empowerment scheduling for a field workforce. J Sched 14, 639–654 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-011-0232-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-011-0232-2