Abstract
In this study, we use a spatially smoothed seismicity procedure for seismic hazard analysis in North China seismic zone by establishing four spatially smoothed seismicity models according to the seismic catalogs of North China and calculating peak ground acceleration (PGA) values with 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years. The results show considerable differences between seismic hazards based on different models in certain areas, which is attributable to disparities in the seismicity levels of the four seismic models in those areas. In general, seismic hazard based on different models can be used as reference to evaluate uncertainty. In this paper, we also compare the mean PGA based on four spatially smoothed seismicity models with another PGA calculated using the zoning method based on surface seismic sources adopted for generating the Seismic Ground Motion Parameter Zonation Map of China, and find that the results of the two methods are largely similar, both of which can reflect the seismic hazard level of North China. However, there are differences at certain points, which are because the zoning approach adopts the same earthquake occurrence rate in the seismic source, while the spatially smoothed seismicity approach has different occurrence rates at different points. The discrepancies between the two can be attributed to differences in the principles adopted when potential seismic sources are classified. In particular, the PGA values of Beijing with 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years is 177.0cm/s2, 214.2 cm/s2, 252.8 cm/s2, and 187.5 cm/s2 in four spatial seismicity models, respectively. These PGA values are very important for evaluating the uncertainty of seismic hazard in Beijing. This study is an attempt to perform seismic hazard analysis using spatially smoothed seismicity models in China and recommends using this approach for areas where seismic sources are not clearly identified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beauval C, Scotti O, Bonilla F (2006) The role of seismicity models in probabilistic seismic hazard estimation: comparison of a zoning and a smoothing approach. Geophys J Int 165:584–595
Cao T, Petersen MD, Reichle MS (1996) Seismic hazard estimate from background seismicity in southern California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:1372–1381
Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583–1606
Frankel A (1995) Mapping seismic hazard in the central and eastern, United States. Seismol Res Lett 66:8–21
Frankel, A. C., Mueller C, Barnhard T, Perkins D, Leyendecker E, Dickman N, Hanson S, Hopper M (1996) National Seismic-Hazard Maps Documentation, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept 96-532
Frankel AC, Mueller C, Barnhard T, Leyendecker E, Wesson R, Harmsen S, Klein F, Perkins D, Dickamn N, Hanson S, Hopper M (2000) USGS national seismic hazard maps. Earthq Spectra 16:1–20
Frankel A D, Petersen M. D., Mueller C. S., Haller K. M., Wheeler R. L., Leyendecker E. V., Wesson R. L., Harmsen S. C., Cramer C. H., Perkins D. M., and Rukstales K. S. (2002) Documentation for the 2002 update of the national seismic hazard maps, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept 02-420
Gao MT (2015) A handbook of GB18306–2015 ‘Seismic Ground Motion Parameter Zonation Map of China’. China Standard Press, Beijing
Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(5):1363–1367
Hagos L, Arvidsson R, Robets R (2006) Application of the spatially smoothed seismicity and Monte Carlo methods to estimate the seismic Hazard of Eritrea and the surrounding region. Nat Hazards 39:395–418
Huang WQ, Li WX, Cao XF (1994) Completeness analysis of earthquake catalogs in China Main land I. Acta Seismol Sin (in Chinese) 16(3):273–280
Lapajne JK, Motnikar B, Zabukovec B, Zupančič P (1997) Spatially smoothed seismicity modelling of seismic hazard in Slovenia. J Seismol 1:73–85
Lapajne JK, Motnikar B, Zupančic P (2003) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment methodology for distributed seismicity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:2502–2515
McGuire R K (1976) Fortran computer program for seismic risk analysis. U.S. Geol Surv. Open-File Rept. 76-67: 90 pp.
Peláez JA, López Casado C (2002) Seismic hazard estimate at the Iberian Peninsula. Pure Appl Geophys 159:2699–2713
Peláez JA, Hamdacheb M, López Casado C (2003) Seismic hazard in northern Algeria using spatially smoothed seismicity. Results for peak ground acceleration. Tectonophysics 372:105–119
Petersen M D, Frankel A D, Harmsen S C, Mueller C S, Haller K M, Wheeler R L, Wesson R L, Zeng Y, Boyd O S, Perkins D M, Luco N, Field E H, Wills C J, Rukstales K S (2008) Documentation for the 2008 Update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept 2008-1128
Reiter L (1990) Earthquake hazard analysis: issues and insights. Columbia U Press, New York 254 pp
Wang SY, Yu YX, Gao AJ (2000) Development of attenuation relations for ground motion in China. Earthq Res China (in Chinese) 16(2):99–106
Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude rupture length rupture width rupture area and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002
Woo G (1996) Kernel estimation method for seismic hazard area source modeling. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:353–362
Xu WJ (2012) Study on space-time statistical distribution models of earthquakes in seismic hazard analysis. [Ph.D. thesis]. Beijing: Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration (in Chinese)
Xu WJ, Gao MT (2014) Statistical analysis of the completeness of earthquake catalogs in China mainland. Chin J Geochem (in Chinese) 57(9):2802–2281
Yang Y, Shi BP, L Sun L (2008) Seismic hazard estimation based on the distribution seismicity in North China. Acta Seismol Sin 21(2):202–212
Yu YX, Li SY, Xiao L (2013) Development of ground motion attenuation relations for the new seismic hazard maps of China. Technol Earthq Disaster Prev (in Chinese) 8(1):24–33
Acknowledgments
We thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.
Funding
This work was sponsored by the National Key Research and Development of China (Grant Number 2017YFC1500402), the Special Fund of Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Admininstration (Grant Number DQJB17C01). This work was also funded by the Earthquake Industry Specific Fund (201408014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, WJ. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment using spatially smoothed seismicity in North China seismic zone. J Seismol 23, 613–622 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09825-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09825-2