Journal of Seismology

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 715–726 | Cite as

Detection of pulse-like ground motions based on continues wavelet transform

  • Saman Yaghmaei-Sabegh
Original Article


This paper implements a quantitative approach to detect pulse-like ground motions based on continues wavelet transform, which is able to clearly identify sudden jumps in time history of earthquake records by considering contribution of different levels of frequency. These analyses were performed on a set of time series records obtained in near-fault regions of Iran. Pulse-like ground motions frequently resulted from directivity effects in near-fault area and are of interest in the field of seismology and also earthquake engineering for seismic performance evaluation of structures. The results of this study basically help us to establish a suitable platform for selecting pulse-like records, while performance evaluation of structure in near-fault area will need to account. The period of velocity pulses as a key parameter that significantly affects structural response is simply determined by using a pseudo-period of the mother wavelets. In addition, the efficiency of different types of mother wavelets on classification performance and the features of detected pulse are investigated by applying seven different kinds of mother wavelets. The analyses indicate that the selection of most appropriate mother wavelet plays a significant role in effective extraction of ground motion features and consequently in estimation of velocity pulse period. As a result, the user should be aware of what is selected as a mother wavelet in the analysis. The comparisons given here among different mother wavelets also show the better performance of BiorSpline (bior1.3) basis from biorthognal wavelet families for the preferred purpose in this paper.


Pulse-like ground motions Near-fault Directivity Continues wavelet transform Mother wavelet Iran 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akkar S, Yazgan U, Gulkan P (2005) Drift estimates in frame buildings subjected to near-fault ground motions. J Struct Eng 131(7):1014–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2001) Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structures Blume Center Report 138. Stanford, California, 301 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JC, Bertero VV (1987) Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes. J Struct Eng 113(8):1709–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antonini M, Barlaud M, Mathieu P, Daubechies I (1992) Image coding using wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Image Process 1(2):205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker JW (2007) Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:1486–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basu B, Gupta VK (1997) Non-stationary seismic response of MDOF systems by wavelet transform. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26:243–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boroschek RL, Comte DY (2006) Amplitude and frequency characteristics of the 2001 Southern Peru, Mw = 8.4 earthquake records. J Seismol 10:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bray JD, Rodríguez-Marek A (2004) Characterization of forward directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dyn Earthqu Eng 24(11):815–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cao H, Friswell MI (2009) The effect of energy concentration of earthquake ground motions on the nonlinear response of RC structures. Soil Dyn Earthqu Eng 29:292–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chanerley AA, Alexander NA (2009) Obtaining estimates of the low-frequency ‘fling’, instrument tilts and displacement time series using wavelet decomposition. Bull Earthq Eng 8(2):231–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chui CK, Wang J (1992) On compactly supported spline wavelets and a duality principle. Trans Am Math Soc 330(2):903–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chopra AK, Chintanapakdee C (2001) Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30:769–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graps A (1995) An introduction to wavelets. IEEE Comput Sci Eng 2(2):50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall JF, Heaton TH, Halling MW, Wald DJ (1995) Near source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings. Earthq Spectra 11(4):569–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haigh SK, Teymur B, Madabhushi SPG, Newlanda DE (2002) Applications of wavelet analysis to the investigation of the dynamic behaviour of geotechnical structures. Soil Dyn Earthqu Eng 22:995–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harbrecht H, Schneider R (2004) Biorthogonal wavelet bases for the boundary element method. Math Nachr 269–270:167–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartzell S, Mendoza C (1991) Application of an iterative least squares waveform inversion of strong-motion and teleseismic records to the 1978 Tabas, Iran, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81:305–331Google Scholar
  18. Huang CS, Su WC (2007) Identification of modal parameters of a time invariant linear system by continuous wavelet transformation. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:1642–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iyama J (2005) Estimate of input energy for elasto-plastic SDOF systems during earthquakes based on discrete wavelet coefficients. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(15):1799–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iyama J, Kuwamura H (1999) Application of wavelet to analysis and simulation of earthquake motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28(3):255–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jung U, Koh B (2009) Structural damage localization using wavelet-based silhouette statistics. J Sound Vib 32:590–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kahan JP, Lemarié-Rieusset PG (1995) Fourier series and wavelets, studies in the development of modern mathematics, vol 3. Gordon and Breach Publishers, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  23. Lockwood OG, Kanamori H (2006) Wavelet analysis of the seismograms of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake and its application to tsunami early warning, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems. G-Cubed 7(9):1–10Google Scholar
  24. Luco N, Cornell CA (2007) Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthq Spectra 23(2):357–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Makris N, Black C (2003) Dimensional analysis of inelastic structures subjected to near fault ground motions. In: Earthquake engineering research center, EERC 2003-05. Berkeley, California, 96 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Mavroeidis GP, Dong G, Papageorgiou AS (2004) Near-fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single degree of-freedom (SDOF) systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33(9):1023–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Menun C, Fu Q (2002) An analytical model for near-fault ground motions and the response of SDOF systems. In: Proceedings of the 7th US national conference on earthquake engineering. Boston, Massachusetts, 10 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Morlet J, Arens G, Fourgeau I, Giard D (1982) Wave propagation and sampling theory. Geophysics 47:203–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mukherjee S, Gupta VK (2002) Wavelet-based characterization of design ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:1173–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newland DN (1997) An introduction to random vibrations, spectral and wavelet analysis. Longman, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  31. Pazos A, González MJ, Alguacil G (2003) Non-linear filter, using the wavelet transform, applied to seismological records. J Seismol 7:413–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rao RM, Bopardikar AS (1998) Wavelet transforms: introduction to theory and applications. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  33. Sasani M, Bertero VV (2000) Importance of severe pulse-type ground motions in performance-based engineering: historical and critical review. In: Proceeding, 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, Paper No. 1302Google Scholar
  34. Shoja-Taheri J, Ghofrani H (2007) Stochastic finite-fault modeling of strong ground motions from the 26 December 2003 Bam, Iran, Earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(6):1950–1959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simons FJ, Dando BD, Allen RM (2006) Automatic detection and rapid determination of earthquake magnitude by wavelet multiscale analysis of the primary arrival. Earth Planet Sci Lett 250:214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Somerville PG (1997) The characteristics and quantification of near fault ground motion. In: Proceedings of the FHWA/NCEER workshop on the national representation of seismic ground motion for new and existing highway facilities. Burlingame, California, pp 293–318Google Scholar
  37. Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA (1997) Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):199–222Google Scholar
  38. Spudich P, Chiou BS, Graves RW, Collins KR, Somerville PG (2004) A formulation of directivity for earthquake sources using isochrone theory, US Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 2004-1268, 54 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. Suter BW (1997) Multirate and wavelet signal processing. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Todorovska MI, Meidani H, Trifunac MD (2009) Wavelet approximation of earthquake strong ground motion-goodness off it for a database in terms of predicting nonlinear structural response. Soil Dyn Earthqu Eng 29:742–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tothong P, Cornell CA, Baker JW (2007) Explicit-directivity pulse inclusion in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Earthq Spectra 23(4):867–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xi-zhen W, Yun-tian T, Meng-tan G, Hui J (2004) Seismic data compression based on integer wavelet transform. Acta Seismol Sin 17:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yan G, Duan Z, Oua J, Stefano A (2010) Structural damage detection using residual forces based on wavelet transform. Mech Syst Signal Process 24:24–239Google Scholar
  44. Yun-tian T, Xi-zhen W, Xiao-mei W, Jie-mei M, Jian-hua X (2006) P wave onset time picking with the B-spline biorthogonal wavelet. Acta Seismol Sin 19(3):350–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhou Z, Adeli H (2003) Time-frequency signal analysis of earthquake records using Mexican Hat wavelets. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 18(5):379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations