Advertisement

Journal of Seismology

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 91–103 | Cite as

Hybrid stochastic finite fault modeling of 2003, M6.5, Bam earthquake (Iran)

  • Dariush Motazedian
  • Aliakbar Moinfar
Article

Abstract

Accelerographic time series of the M 6.5 Bam (Iran) earthquake of December 26, 2003, are used to calibrate the source and propagation path characteristics based on a hybrid stochastic approach, which includes stochastic finite fault and analytical modeling. Estimation of source characteristics is based on the calibration of finite-fault modeling to near-source observed time series, while propagation characteristics are estimated using far-field recorded ones. The distance-dependent Kappa factor is obtained from the slope of smoothed amplitude of acceleration Fourier spectrum at higher frequencies. The estimated zero-distance Kappa value is 0.06. Calibration based on near-source time series indicates a stress drop of 130 bars for the Bam earthquake. The strong impulsive long-period motion, recorded at the only near-source station, is modeled using analytical modeling of Mavroeidis and Papageorgiou (2003).

Keywords

Bam earthquake ground motion simulation near-source effects seismology stochastic and hybrid earthquake fault modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamson, N. and Silva, W., 1997, Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes, Seism. Res. L. 68, 94–127.Google Scholar
  2. Abrahamson, N., 2001, Incorporating effects of near fault tectonic deformation into design ground motions, a presentation sponsored by the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Visiting Professional Program, hosted by the University at Buffalo, 26 October 2001, http://mceer.buffalo.edu/outreach/pr/abrahamson.asp.
  3. Aki, K., 1967, Scaling law of seismic spectrum, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 1217–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aki, K., 1968, Seismic displacement near a fault, J. Geophys. Res. 64, 321–342.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. and Hough, S., 1984, A model for the shape of the Fourier amplitude spectrum of acceleration at high frequencies, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 74, 1969–1993.Google Scholar
  6. Archuleta, R.J. and Frazier, G.A., 1978, Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dynamic faulting in a half-space, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 68, 541–572.Google Scholar
  7. Archuleta, R.J. and Hartzell, S.H., 1981, Effects of fault finiteness on near-source ground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 71, 939–957.Google Scholar
  8. Atkinson, G., 2004, Empirical Attenuation of Ground-Motion Spectral Amplitudes in Southeastern Canada and the Northeastern United States. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94, 1079–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Atkinson, G. and Boore, D., 1995, New ground motion relations for eastern North America, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 17–30.Google Scholar
  10. Atkinson, G. and Silva, W., 1997, Empirical source spectra for California earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 87, 97–113.Google Scholar
  11. Beresnev, I. and Atkinson, G., 1998a, FINSIM – a FORTRAN program for simulating stochastic acceleration time histories from finite faults, Seism. Res. L. 69, 27–32.Google Scholar
  12. Beresnev, I. and Atkinson, G., 1998b, Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1994 Northridge, California earthquake. I. Validation on rock sites. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 1392–1401.Google Scholar
  13. Boore, D., 1983, Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73, 1865–1894.Google Scholar
  14. Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B. and Wennerberg, L., 1992, Fitting the stochastic omega-squared source model to observed response spectra in Western North America: Trade-offs Between Δσ and κ. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 82, 1956–1963.Google Scholar
  15. Boore, D. and Joyner, W., 1997, Site amplifications for generic rock sites. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 87, 327–341.Google Scholar
  16. Brune, J., 1970, Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 75, 4997–5009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brune, J., 1971, Correction to Brune (1970), J. Geophys. Res. 76, 2005.Google Scholar
  18. Building and Housing Research Center, 2004, The Very Urgent Preliminary Report on Bam Earthquake of December 26–2003, 2003. http://www.bhrc.ac.ir/.
  19. Campillo, M., Gariel, J.-C., Aki, K. and Sanchez-Sesma, F.J., 1989, Destructive strong ground motion in Mexico City: source, path, and site effects during the Great 1985 Michoacan earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 79, 1718–1735.Google Scholar
  20. Dehghani, G. and Makris, J., 1984, The gravity field and crustal structure of Iran, N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh. 168, 215–229.Google Scholar
  21. Hartzell, S., 1978, Earthquake aftershocks as Green's functions, Geophys. Res. Letters 5, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heaton, T. and Hartzell, S., 1986, Source characteristics of hypothetical subduction earthquakes in the Northwestern United States, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 76, 675–708.Google Scholar
  23. Hisada, Y. and Bielak, J., 2003, A Theoretical Method for Computing Near-Fault Ground Motions in Layered Half-Spaces Considering Static Offset Due to Surface Faulting, with a Physical Interpretation of Fling Step and Rupture Directivity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93(3), 1154–1168.Google Scholar
  24. Hosseini, K.A., Mahdavifar, M.R., Keshavarz Bakhshayesh, M. and Rakhshandeh, M., 2004, Engineering Geology and Geotechnical Aspects of Bam Earthquake (Preliminary Report), International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology Report. http://www.iiees.ac.ir/English/bam_report_english_geo.html.
  25. Irikura, K., 1983, Semi-empirical estimation of strong ground motions during large earthquakes. Bull. Disaster Prevention Res. Inst., Kyoto Univ. 33, 63–104.Google Scholar
  26. Joyner, W. and Boore, D., 1986, On simulating large earthquakes by Green's function additon of smaller earthquakes. In: Earthquake Source Mechanics. Maurice Ewing Volume 6. Geophys. Monogr. Am. Geophys. Union 37, 269–274.Google Scholar
  27. Mavroeidis, G.P. and Papageorgiou, A.S., 2002, Near-source strong ground motion: characteristics and design issues, in Proceedings of the Seventh U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (7NCEE), Boston, Massachusetts, 21–25, July 2002.Google Scholar
  28. Mavroeidis, G.P. and Papageorgiou, A.S., 2003, A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 1099–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Motazedian, D., 2002, Development of ground motion relations for Puerto Rico using the stochastic finite-fault method. Ph.D. Thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  30. Motazedian, D. and Atkinson, G., 2005, Stochastic Finite-Fault Modeling Based on a Dynamic Corner Frequency, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 995–1010.Google Scholar
  31. Papageorgiou, A.S., 1998, The character of near-source ground motions and related seismic design, in Proc of the structural Engineers World Congress, San Francisco, California, 18–23 July 1998.Google Scholar
  32. Seber, D., Barazangi, M., Ibenbrahim, A. and Demnati, A., 1996, Geophysical evidence for lithospheric delamination beneath the Alboran Sea and Rif-Betic mountains, Nature 379, 785–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Somerville, P., Sen, M. and Cohee, B., 1991, Simulations of strong ground motions recorded during the 1985 Michoacan, Mexico and Valparaiso, Chile, earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 81, 1–27.Google Scholar
  34. Somerville, P., 1998, Development of an improved representation of near-fault ground motions, SMIP98-CDMG, Oakland, California, 1–20.Google Scholar
  35. Somerville, P., 2000, New development in seismic hazard estimation, in Proceedings of the sixth Int. Conf. on Seismic Zonation (6ICSZ), Palm Springs, California, 12–15 November 2000.Google Scholar
  36. Somerville, P., Smith, N.C. and Graves, R.W., 1997, Modification of Empirical Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations to Include the Amplitude and Duration Effects of Rupture Directivity, Seismological Research Letter 68(1), 199–221.Google Scholar
  37. Talebian, M., Fielding, E.J., Funning, G.J., Ghorashi, M., Jackson, J.A., Nazari, H., Parsons, B., Priestley, K., Rosen, P.A., Walker, R. and Wright, T.J., 2004, The 2003 Bam (Iran) earthquake: Rupture of a blind strike-slip fault, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31(11), L11611, doi:10.1029/2004GL020058.Google Scholar
  38. Tumarkin, A. and Archuleta, R., 1994, Empirical ground motion prediction, Annali Di Geofisica. 37, 1691–1720.Google Scholar
  39. Wells, D. and Coppersmith, K., 1994, New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 974–1002.Google Scholar
  40. Zeng, Y., Anderson, J. and Yu, G., 1994, A composite source model for computing realistic synthetic strong ground motions, Geophysical Research Letters 21, 725–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth ScienceCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations