Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Germ-Inating Solutions or Gene-Rating Problems: An Islamic Perspective on Human Germline Gene Editing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human germline gene editing (hGGE) poses many questions for the Muslim community. They range from the scientific: is there sufficient evidence that hGGE is better than existing technologies? To the ethical: is the lack of consent an insurmountable hurdle? What is the moral status of the embryo? What effect would hGGE have on societal inequalities? And, most crucially, can hGGE be interdicted on the basis of preventing its ineluctable use in eugenic programming? This paper confronts these issues from a religious perspective basing its judgements and reasoning on traditional sources of Islamic jurisprudence. It concludes that, except in very few instances that must be individual and case-specific, hGGE is not congruent with the tenets of Islam.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. One may, of course, add the burden of self-expectation such enhancement thrusts upon the individual.

  2. There is also the question of what parts of the body are included in the ‘awra of men and women, about which there is considerable difference of opinion. See Al-Jazīrī, ‘Abd al-Raḥmān. (2003). Al-Fiqh ‘ala’l-madhāhib al-arba‘a. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya, 1:172.

  3. Though somewhat beyond the scope of this paper, it is noteworthy that gender selection is only permissible in Islam when there is a ghalabat al-ẓann of X-linked diseases. This is because it meets the criterion of cure (dawā’) for a specific illness (Nasim 2012, 1–12). On a similar note, a person who is a hermaphrodite/ intersex identity (khuntha) may undergo sex-reassignment surgery (SRS) if there is ghalabat al-ẓann, in the opinion of experienced professionals, that the condition meets the criterion for illness. Any surgical intervention, therefore, is considered treatment (Alipour 2017, 91–103; Skovgaard-Petersen 1995).

References

  • Alipour, M. (2017). Islamic shari’a law, neotraditionalist Muslim scholars and transgender sex-reassignment surgery: A case study of Ayatollah Khomeini’s and Sheikh al-Tantawi’s fatwas. International Journal of Transgenderism,18(1), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ālūsī, A. (2005). Rūḥ al-ma‘ānī fī tafsīr al-qur’ān al-‘aẓīm wa’l-sab‘ al-mathānī. Cairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth.

  • Al-Bābartī, M. (n.d.). Al-‘Ināyah sharḥ al-hidāya. n.p.: n.p.

  • Barrett, J. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God?. Lanham: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Bukhārī, M. (2009). Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.

  • Collins, F. (2015, April). Statement on NIH funding of research using gene-editing technologies in human embryos. Retrieved from: https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/statement-nih-funding-research-using-gene-editing-technologies-human-embryos.

  • Cwik, B. (2017). Designing ethical trials of germline gene editing. The New England Journal of Medicine,377(20), 1911–1913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnovsky, M. (2015). Public interest group calls for strengthening global policies against human germline modification. April, 2015. https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/press-statement/public-interest-group-calls-strengthening-global-policies-against-human-germline?id=8528.

  • Friedmann, T., Jonlin, E. C., King, N. M. P., Torbett, B. E., Wivel, N. A., Kaneda, Y., et al. (2015). ASGCT and JSGT joint position statement on human genomic editing. Molecular Therapy,23(8), 1282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuqahā’ al-Kuwayt. (1984). Al-Mawsū‘a al-fiqhiyya al-kuwaytiyya. Kuwait: Dār al-Salāsil.

  • Gyngell, C., Douglas, T., & Savulescu, J. (2017). The ethics of germline gene editing. Journal of Applied Philosophy,34(4), 498–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ḥākim, A. (n.d.). Al-Mustdrak ‘ala’l-ṣaḥīḥayn. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.

  • Hallaq, W. (1997). A history of Islamic legal theories: An introduction to Sunnī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (2007). Enhancing evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ḥaṣkafī, M. (2002). Al-Durr al-mukhtār. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.

  • Al-Hintātī, A. (n.d.). Maṭali‘ al-tamām wa naṣā’iḥ al-anām. n.p.: n.p.

  • Ibn ‘Ābidīn al-Shāmī, M. (2000). Radd al-muhtār ‘alā al-durr al-mukhtār sharḥ tanwīr al-abṣār. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

  • Ibn Aḥmad, ‘A. (1996). Al-Madkhal ilā madhhab al-imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.

  • Ibn ‘Arabī, M. (2002). Fuṣūṣ al-ḥikam. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-‘Arabī.

  • Ibn Ḥanbal, A. (n.d.). Musnad Aḥmad. Cairo: Mu’assasat Qurṭuba.

  • Ibn Kathīr, ‘I. (1998). Tafsīr al-qur’ān al-‘aẓīm. Damascus: Maktabat Dār al-Fīḥā’.

  • Ibn Mājah, A. (n.d.). Sunan Ibn Mājah. n.p.: Maktabat Abu’l-Mu‘āṭī.

  • Ibn Nujaym, Z. (2003). Al-Ashbāh wa’l-naẓā’ir. Beirut: Dār al-‘Aṣriyya.

  • Ibn Nujaym, Z. (n.d.). Al-Baḥr al-rā’iq sharḥ kanz al-daqā’iq. n.p.: n.p.

  • Ibn Ṣadr al-Shahīd, B. (n.d.). Al-Muḥīṭ al-burhānī. n.p.: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.

  • Ibn al-Subkī, T. (1991). Ashbāh wa’l-naẓā’ir. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.

  • Ibn Taymiyya, T. (1971). Dar’ al-ta‘āruṬ al-‘aql wa’l-naql. Riyad: Dār al-Kunūz al-Adabiyya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, S. (2015, December). Proceedings from: International summit on human gene editing: A global discussion. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK343651/.

  • Al-Jazīrī, ‘A. (2003). Al-Fiqh ‘ala’l-madhāhib al-arba‘a. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.

  • Kamali, M. (2011). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, X., He, W., Huang, Y., Yu, Q., Chen, Y., Gao, X., et al. (2016). Introducing precise genetic modifications into human 3PN embryos by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics,33(5), 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0710-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lanphier, E., Urnov, F., Haecker, S. E., Werner, M., & Smolenski, J. (2015). Don’t edit the human germline. Nature, 519(7544). Retrieved from: https://www.nature.com/news/don-t-edit-the-human-germ-line-1.17111.

  • Liang, P., Xu, Y., Zhang, X., Ding, C., Huang, R., Zhang, Z., et al. (2015). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes. Protein and Cell,6(5), 363–372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, H., Marti-Gutierrez, N., Park, S. W., Wu, J., Lee, Y., Suzuki, K., et al. (2017). Correction of a pathogenic gene mutation in human embryos. Nature,548, 413–419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Majma‘ al-Fiqh al-Islāmī al-Duwalī. (1988–2009). Qarārāt wa tawṣiyyāt majma‘ al-fiqh al-islāmī al-duwalī. n.p.: n.p.

  • Al-Maẓhari, M. (2007). Al-Tafsīr al-Maẓharī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.

  • Mursī, M. (2005). Al-Tarbiya al-islāmiyya uṣuluhā wa taṭawwuruhā fi’l-bilād al-‘arabiyya. Riyad: ‘Ālam al-Kutub.

  • Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj, A. (n.d.). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Beirut: Dār al-Āfāq al-Jadīda.

  • Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj, A. (2008). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.

  • Al-Nasafi, ‘A. (2011). Tafsīr al-Nasafī. Beirut: Dār Ibn Kathīr.

  • Nasim, A. (2012). Ethical issues of biotechnology and genetic engineering: An Islamic perspective. In Proceedings of 11 the IAS conference on biotechnology and genetic engineering for development in Islamic word. Morocco, Rabat, pp. 1–12.

  • Pugh, J. (2014). Autonomy, natality and freedom: A liberal re-examination of Habermas in the enhancement debate. Bioethics,29(3), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12082/full.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qaḍ̣āt, S. (1990). Matā tunfakh al-rūḥ fi’l-janīn? Amman: Dār al-Furqān.

  • Al-Qarāfī, S. (1994). Al-Dhakhīra. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb.

  • Al-Qarāfī, S. (n.d.). Anwār al-burūq fī anwā‘ al-furūq. n.p.: n.p.

  • Al-Qurṭubi, A. (2004). Tafsīr al-Qurṭubī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.

  • Al-Rāzī, F. (2004). Mafātiḥ al-ghayb. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.

  • Al-Shahīd, B. (n.d.). Al-Muḥīṭ al-burhānī. n.p.: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.

  • Al-Shāṭibī, I. (1997). Al-Muwāfaqāt. Cairo: Dār Ibn ‘Affān.

  • Al-Shuhūd, ‘A. (n.d.). Al-Khulāṣa fī fiqh al-aqalliyāt. n.p.: n.p.

  • Sparrow, R. (2014). Better living through chemistry? A reply to Savulescu and Persson on ‘Moral enhancement’. Journal of Applied Philosophy,31(1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sulamī,‘I. (n.d.). Uṣūl al-fiqh alladhī lā yasi‘ al-faqīh jahluh. n.p.: n.p.

  • Skovgaard-Petersen, J. (1995). Sex change in Cairo: Gender and Islamic law. Journal of the International Institute, 2(3). Retrieved from http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jii/4750978.0002.302?view=text;rgn=main.

  • Al-Ṭabarī, A. (2005). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.

  • Al-Ṭaḥṭāwī, A. (n.d.). Ḥāshiyat ‘alā marāqī al-falāḥ sharḥ nūr al-īḍāḥ. Cairo: Būlāq.

  • Al-Tirmidhī, A. (2009). Jāmi‘ al-Tirmidhī. Karachi: Altaf & Sons.

  • Al-Tha‘ālibī, ‘A. (1996). Jawāhir al-ḥisān fī tafsīr al-qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.

  • Al-Tuwayjirī, Ḥ. (1991). Kitāb al-ru’ya. Riyad: Dār al-Liwā’.

  • ‘Ulamā’ al-Su’ūdiyya. (2004). Al-Buḥūth al-‘ilmiyya. Riyad: Ri’āsat Idārāt al-Buḥūth al-‘Ilmiyya wa’l-Iftā’.

  • Vendler, H. (1984). Wallace Stevens: Words chosen out of desire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Zamakhsharī, A. (1977). Al-Kashshāf ‘an ḥaqā’iq al-tanzīl wa ‘uyūn al-aqāwīl fī wujūd al-ta’wīl. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

  • Al-Zarkashī, B. (2000). Al-Baḥr al-muḥīt fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.

  • Zou, Q., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Ouyang, Z., Long, H., Wei, S., et al. (2015). Generation of gene-target dogs using CRISPR/Cas9 system. Journal of Molecular Cell Biology,7(6), 580–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Zuḥaylī, M. (2006). Al-Qawā’id al-fiqhiyya wa taṭbīqātuhā fi’l-madhāhib al-arba‘a. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express his gratitude for the support of the Centre of Islam and Medicine (CIM) where an earlier version of this paper was presented. A special mention must also be made of Arzoo Ahmed, the Director of CIM, who first suggested this topic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismail Lala.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lala, I. Germ-Inating Solutions or Gene-Rating Problems: An Islamic Perspective on Human Germline Gene Editing. J Relig Health 59, 1855–1869 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00770-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00770-5

Keywords

Navigation