Skip to main content
Log in

Spiritual Openness, Revisiting a Potentially Important Aspect of Spirituality: Scale Review and Revision

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Religiousness and spirituality (R/S) exert important influences on individuals across a range of domains. Spiritual Openness is theoretically linked with the personality trait of Openness to Experience, suggesting promise for future research. Using responses from 366 undergraduates on the Spiritual Experience Index-Revised (SEI-R: subscales of Spiritual Openness and Spiritual Support), analyses evaluated and revised the SEI-R, deleting poor items and generating a 10-item measure. The new SEI-S exhibits better psychometric properties and reduced participant burden, and subscales displayed a curvilinear relationship in which increases in Spiritual Openness showed a trade-off in levels of Spiritual Support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443. doi:10.1037/h0021212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1976). Religion as prosocial: Agent or double agent? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15, 29–45. doi:10.2307/1384312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonelli, R. M., & Koenig, H. G. (2013). Mental disorders, religion and spirituality 1990 to 2010: A systematic evidence-based review. Journal of Religion and Health, 52, 657–673. doi:10.1007/s10943-013-9691-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canada, A. L., Murphy, P. E., Fitchett, G., Peterman, A. H., & Schover, L. R. (2008). A 3-factor model for the FACIT-Sp. Psycho-Oncology, 17, 908–916. doi:10.1002/pon.1307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & MacCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO FFI): Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csarny, R. J., Piedmont, R. L., Sneck, W. J., & Cheston, S. E. (2000). An evaluation of the incremental validity of the Spiritual Experience Index-Revised. In J. M. Greer & D. O. Moberg (Eds.), Research in the social scientific study of religion (Vol. 11, pp. 117–132). Stamford, CT: Jai Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. E., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Hook, J. N., & Hill, P. C. (2013). Research on religion/spirituality and forgiveness: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5, 233–241. doi:10.1037/a0033637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jager Meezenbroek, E., Garssen, B., van den Berg, M., Tuytel, G., van Dierendonck, D., Visser, A., et al. (2012a). Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: Development of the spiritual attitude and involvement list (SAIL). Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 30, 141–167. doi:10.1080/07347332.2011.651258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Jager Meezenbroek, E., Garssen, B., van den Berg, M., van Dierendonck, D., Visser, A., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012b). Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: A review of spirituality questionnaires. Journal of Religion and Health, 51, 336–354. doi:10.1007/s10943-010-9376-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dein, S., Cook, C. C., & Koenig, H. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and mental health: Current controversies and future directions. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 200, 852–855. doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e31826b6dle.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(3), 1–13. Available online: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=17&n=3.

  • Garssen, B., Visser, A., & de Jager Meezenbroek, E. (2012). Instruments measuring spirituality in clinical research. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(4), 401. doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1973-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Genia, V. (1990). Religious development: A synthesis and reformulation. Journal of Religion and Health, 29, 85–99. doi:10.1007/BF00986404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Genia, V. (1991). The Spiritual Experience Index: A measure of spiritual maturity. Journal of Religion and Health, 30, 337–347. doi:10.1007/BF00986905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Genia, V. (1997). The Spiritual Experience Index: Revision and reformulation. Review of Religious Research, 38, 344–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giblin, P. R. (1997). Marital spirituality: A quantitative study. Journal of Religion and Health, 36, 333–344. doi:10.1023/A:1027481125385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcrow, M. S. (2010). Relationships between religiosity, spirituality, and health behaviors among college students. Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL. Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations & Theses (AAT 3439814).

  • Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational research methods, 7(2), 191–205.

  • Hill, P. C., & Pargament, K. I. (2008). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, S(1), 3–17. doi:10.1037/1941-1022.S.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44, 153–166. doi:10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, S. A., Masters, K. S., & Carey, K. B. (2013). Multidimensional assessment of religiousness/spirituality and health behaviors in college students. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. doi:10.1080/10508619.2013.808870. (online).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, B., Yoon, D. P., Franklin, K. L., Schopp, L., & Hinkebein, J. (2009). Re-conceptualizing the factor structure of the brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality. Journal of Religion and Health, 48, 146–163. doi:10.1007/s10943-008-9179-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (2002a). Censored variables and censored regression. Karl’s Corner. Retrieved from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/censor.pdf.

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (2002b). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL. Karl’s Corner. Retrieved from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/ordinal.pdf.

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Moustaki, I. (2006). Factor analysis of ordinal variables with full information maximum likelihood. Karl’s Corner. Accessed from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/orfiml.pdf

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 user’s reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry. doi:10.5402/2012/278730. (online).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, K. A., & Younger, J. W. (2002). Theobiology: An analysis of spirituality, cardiovascular responses, stress, mood, and physical health. Journal of Religion and Health, 41(4), 347–362. doi:10.1023/A:1021126510680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L. M. (2008). Spiritual assessment in African-Americans: A review of measures of spirituality used in health research. Journal of Religion and Health, 47, 458–475. doi:10.1007/s10943-007-9151-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, K. S., Carey, K. B., Maisto, S. A., Caldwell, P. E., Wolfe, T. V., Hackney, H. L., et al. (2009). Psychometric examination of the brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality among college students. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 106–120. doi:10.1080/10508610802711194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Thoresen, C. E. (2003). Spirituality, religion, and health: An emerging research field. American Psychologist, 58, 24–35. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monod, S., Brennan, M., Rochat, E., Martin, E., Rochat, S., & Bula, C. J. (2012). Spiritual assessment in clinical setting: The need for future research. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27, 402. doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1974-4.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Monod, S., Brennan, M., Rochat, E., Martin, E., Rochat, S., & Büla, C. J. (2011). Instruments measuring spirituality in clinical research: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26, 1345–1357. doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1769-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being, and quality of life. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 224–237). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., & Perez, L. M. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 519–543.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy–spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 49–58. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_06.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quandt, S. A., Verhoef, M. J., Arcury, T. A., Lewith, G. T., Steinsbekk, A., Kristoffersen, A. E., et al. (2009). Development of an international questionnaire to measure use of complementary and alternative medicine (I-CAM-Q). The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(4), 331–339. doi:10.1089/acm.2008.0521.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reinert, D. F., & Bloomingdale, J. R. (2000). Spiritual experience, religious orientation, and self-reported behavior. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10, 173–180. doi:10.1207/S15327582IJPR1003_03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinert, D. F., & Smith, C. E. (1997). Childhood sexual abuse and female spiritual development. Counseling and Values, 41, 235–245. doi:10.1002/j.2161-007X.1997.tb00405.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. S., Laughlin, J. E., & Wedell, D. H. (1999). Validity issues in the Likert and Thurstone approaches to attitude measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 211–233. doi:10.1177/00131649921969811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seybold, K. S., & Hill, P. C. (2001). The role of religion and spirituality in mental and physical health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 21–24. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, E. W., Silke, A., Tucker, S., Fricks, L., & Druss, B. G. (2010). Integrating wellness, recovery, and self-management for mental health consumers. Community Mental Health Journal, 46, 130–138. doi:10.1007/s10597-009-9276-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Younger, J. W., Piferi, R. L., Jobe, R. L., & Lawler, K. A. (2004). Dimensions of forgiveness: The views of laypersons. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 837–855. doi:10.1177/0265407504047843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved from http://statmodel2.com/download/Yudissertation.pdf.

  • Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), #4. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/jmasm/vol6/iss1/4. (online).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua C. Eyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eyer, J.C., Kapoor, S., Combs, M.A. et al. Spiritual Openness, Revisiting a Potentially Important Aspect of Spirituality: Scale Review and Revision. J Relig Health 57, 883–900 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0444-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0444-7

Keywords

Navigation