Advertisement

Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 1038–1047 | Cite as

Rethinking Psychosocial Interventions in Natural Disasters: Lessons from Holistic Ecocentrism and Religious Beliefs

  • César San-Juan
Original Paper

Abstract

The history of thought has been determined by the understanding and regulation of the relationships among the human being, Nature and God. This trilogy traditionally consists of completely differentiated elements with suggestive implications in the aesthetic landscape experience. But it is possible to identify cultures in different parts of the world or historic moments characterized by the assimilation of humans as part of Nature, or Nature as part of God. These considerations are particularly important in the so-called “primitive” contemporary societies when devastating natural phenomenon occur, since the design of psychosocial intervention strategies could become linked to religious rituals.

Keywords

Disaster Nature God Ecocentrism Culturally appropriate psychosocial interventions 

References

  1. Anderson, M. B., & Woodrow, P. J. (1988). Development strategies in times of disaster. Portland: Book News.Google Scholar
  2. Bankoff, G. (2004). In the eye of storm: The social construction of the forces of nature and the climatic and seismic construction of God in the Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 35, 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barandiarán, J. M. (1953). El hombre prehistórico en el País Vasco. Buenos Aires: Ekain.Google Scholar
  4. Belmont, C. (2007). Ecofeminism and the natural disaster heroine. Women’s Studies, 36(5), 349–372.Google Scholar
  5. Brace, C., Bailey, A. R., & Harvey, D. C. (2006). Religion, place and space: A framework for investigating historical geographies of religious identities and communities. Progress in Human Geography, 30(1), 28–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brady, E. (2006). Aesthetics in practice: Valuing the natural world. Environmental Values, 15, 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cannon, T. (1994). Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of natural disasters. In A. Varley (Ed.), Disaster, development and environment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Favier, R., & Granet-Abisset, A. M. (2001). Histoire et mèmoire des risques naturels. Grenoble: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme-Alpes.Google Scholar
  9. Fenner, D. E. W. (2003). Aesthetic Appreciation in the Artworld and in the Natural World. Environmental Values, 12(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. García-Mira, R., Real, J. E., Uzzell, D., San Juan, C., & Pol, E. (2006). Coping with a threat to quality of life: The case of the ‘Prestige’ disaster. European Review of Applied Psychology, 56(1), 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haldane, J. (1994). Admiring the high mountains: The aesthetics of environment. Environmental Values, 10, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herzog, T. R., Maguire, C. P., & Nebel, M. B. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hewitt, K. (1983). Interpretations of calamity: From the viewpoint of human ecology. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  14. Hoeberichts, J. H. (2010). Teaching council in Sri Lanka: A post disaster, culturally sensitive and spiritual model of group process. Journal of Religion and Health. doi: 10.1007/s10943-010-9358-3.
  15. Lovelock, J. (1979). Gaia: A new look at life on earth. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. McEntire, D. A. (2001). Triggering agents, vulnerabilities and disaster reduction: Towards a holistic paradigm. Disaster Prevention and Management, 3, 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meserve, H. C. (1970). Mental health and environment. Journal of Religion and Health, 9(4), 303–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Newell, C. (2008). Disability, tsunamis and other acts of god. Journal of Religion, Disability & Health, 9(3), 93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oliver-Smith, A., & Hoffman, S. M. (1999). The angry earth: Disaster in anthropological perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. San Juan, C. (2001). Catástrofes y Ayuda de Emergencia: Estrategias de Evaluación, Prevención y Tratamiento. Barcelona: Icaria.Google Scholar
  21. San Juan, C. (2002). Intervención Psicosocial en catástrofes: Una perspectiva transcultural. Cuadernos de Crisis, 1(1). http://www.cuadernosdecrisis.com/docs/2002/cdc_001.pdf (accessed 15 July 2011).
  22. San Juan, C. (2011). The role of the organizational psychologist in disasters and emergency situations. Disasters, 35(2), 346–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. San Juan, C., & Ortego, Y. (2000). Conflictos socioambientales y áreas protegidas en América Latina: Contextos y métodos de intervención en el caso boliviano. Revista de Intervención Psicosocial, 9(2), 247–258.Google Scholar
  24. Seaton, E. T. (2005). The Gospel of the Redman. Indiana: World Wisdom Books.Google Scholar
  25. Simmons, I. G. (1993). Interpreting nature: Cultural constructions of the environment. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Soper, K. (1995). What is nature? Culture, politics and the non-human. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Vygotsky, L. (1971). The psychology of art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wijkam, A., & Timberlake, L. (1984). Natural disasters: Acts of god or acts of man. Washington, DC: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social Psychology DepartmentUniversity of the Basque CountrySan SebastiánSpain

Personalised recommendations