Is Religious Coping Related to Better Quality of Life Following Acute Myocardial Infarction?
- 290 Downloads
Although few studies have examined the extent to which religiousness is related to better well-being following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), studies from the broader literature suggest that positive religious coping may be helpful while more negative forms of religious coping may be related to poorer well-being. To assess the relationship between positive and negative religious coping and depressive symptoms in patients with AMI, we collected data twice over a 1-month period from 56 patients hospitalized with a first AMI. Controlling for demographic variables and social support, both positive and negative religious coping were independently related to higher levels of depressive symptoms both in hospital and at a one-month follow-up. Further, even when controlling for baseline depressive symptoms, religious coping predicted higher subsequent depressive symptoms. These results suggest that religious coping appears to be maladaptive in dealing with acute MI, perhaps because this type of recovery requires more active forms of coping.
KeywordsPositive religious coping Negative religious coping Myocardial infarction Depressive symptoms
This study was funded by internal grants from the University of Connecticut Research Foundation and Hartford Hospital. We appreciate the work of Tara Wall, Ph.D. in helping us collect the in-hospital data.
- Blumenthal, J. A., Babyak, M. A., Ironson, G., Thoresen, C., Powell, L., Czajkowski, S. et al. (2007). Spirituality, religion, and clinical outcomes in patients recovering from an acute myocardial infarction. Psychosomatic Medicine, 69, 501–508.Google Scholar
- ENRICHD Investigators. (2001). Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) study intervention: Rationale and design. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63, 747–755.Google Scholar
- Exline, J. J., & Rose, E. (2005). Religious and spiritual struggles: Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group. (1999). Multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality for use in health research: A report of a national working group supported by the Fetzer Institute and The National Institute on Aging. Kalamazoo, MI: John E. Fetzer Institute.Google Scholar
- Fitchett, G., Murphy, P. E., Kim, J., Gibbons, J. L., Cameron, J. R., & Davis, J. A. (2004). Religious struggle: Prevalence, correlates and mental health risks in diabetic, congestive heart failure, and oncology patients. International Journal of Psychiatry and Medicine, 34, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gall, T., Charbonneau, C., & Florack, P. (2010). The relationship between religious/spiritual factors and perceived growth following a diagnosis of breast cancer. Psychology & Health, 19, 1–19.Google Scholar
- Idler, E. L., Musick, M. A., Ellison, C. G., George, L. K., Krause, N., et al. (2003). Measuring multiple dimensions of religion and spirituality for health research: Conceptual background and findings from the 1998 General Social Survey. Research on Aging, 25, 327–365.Google Scholar
- Lee, B. Y., & Newberg, A. B. (2010). The interaction of religion and health. In B. D. Beitman (Ed.), Integrative psychiatry (pp. 408–444). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, P. H., Powell, L., Blumenthal, J., Norten, J., Ironson, G., Pitula, R. C., et al. (2003). A short social support measure for patients recovering from myocardial infarction: The ENRICHD Social Support Inventory. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 23, 398–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oman, D., & Thoresen, C. (2005). Do religion and spirituality influence health? In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 435–459). Guilford: New York.Google Scholar
- Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Pargament, K. I. (2007). Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: Understanding and addressing the sacred. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Park, C. L. (in press). Meaning, spirituality, and growth: Protective and resilience factors in health and illness. A. S. Baum, T. A. Revenson & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology, (2nd ed.) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Saroglou, V. (2002). Religion and the five factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 15–25.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed. ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Trevino, K., Pargament, K., Cotton, S., Leonard, A., Hahn, J., Caprini-Faigin, C., et al. (2010). Religious coping and physiological, psychological, social, and spiritual outcomes in patients with HIV/AIDS: Cross-sectional and longitudinal findings. AIDS and Behavior, 14, 379–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- VanVoorhis, C. R. W., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3, 43–50.Google Scholar