Bioethical Issues and Health Care Chaplaincy in Aotearoa New Zealand
- 214 Downloads
This paper summarizes survey and interview results from a cross-sectional study of New Zealand health care chaplaincy personnel concerning their involvement in multiple bioethical issues encountered by patients, families and clinical staff within the health care context. Some implications of this study concerning health care chaplaincy, ecclesiastical institutions, health care institutions and government responsibilities are discussed and recommendations presented.
KeywordsPastoral care Health care chaplains Bioethics New Zealand
This research was conducted under the auspices of the Lincoln School of Health Sciences and then the School of Public Health, La Trobe University (Melbourne, Victoria). The research was funded from a number of sources including the School of Public Health, La Trobe University (Melbourne, Australia), the “Wagstaff Bequest” Ormond College, University of Melbourne (Melbourne, Victoria), the Uniting Church “With love to the World Scholarship” (Sydney, New South Wales), Australian Chaplaincy Utility Research (Melbourne, Victoria), the “Hans Mol Endowment”, Australian National University (Canberra, Australian Capital Territory) and the Australian Health and Welfare Chaplains Association Incorporated (recently reconstituted as ‘Spiritual Care Australia’). Some administrative support was also provided by the ICHC (Wellington, New Zealand).
- Carey, L. B. (1991) Clergy under the knife: A literature review on hospital chaplains. Ministry: Journal of Continuing Education, Sydney, Summer, 7–9.Google Scholar
- Carey, L. B. (2010). Chaplains and health care communication: An Australian perspective. In A. N. Miller & D. L. Rubin (Eds.), Health communication and faith based communities. Cresshill, New Jersey: Hampton Press. (In press).Google Scholar
- Carey, L. B., Aroni, R. A., & Gronlund, M. (1998). Bio-Medical Ethics, Clinical Decision Making and Hospital Chaplaincy in New Zealand: A research overview. Ministry, Society and Theology, 12(2), 12–20. Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Carey, L. B., Cobb, M., & Equeall, D. (2005). From pastoral contacts to pastoral interventions. Scottish Journal of Healthcare Chaplaincy, 8(1), 14–20.Google Scholar
- Carey, L. B., & Newell, C. (2002b). Clinical pastoral education and the value of empirical research: Examples from Australian and New Zealand Datum. In L. VandeCreek (Ed.), Professional chaplaincy and clinical pastoral education (pp. 53–65). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
- Carey, L. B., Rumbold, B., Newell, C. J., & Aroni, R. (2006). Bioethical Issues and health care chaplaincy in Australia. Scottish Journal of Healthcare Chaplaincy, 9(1), 23–30.Google Scholar
- Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., & Hays, T. (2008). In-depth Interviewing (3rd ed.). Sydney: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Polgar, S., & Thomas, S. (2008). Research in the Health Sciences. Melbourne: Churchill-Livingston.Google Scholar
- WHO 2002 Tabular List of Procedures ICD-10-AM: Australian Classification of Health Interventions, Vol. 3 of The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision, ‘Pastoral Intervention Codings’. World Health Organization and the National Centre for Classification in Health, University of Sydney, Sydney.Google Scholar