Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 996–1006 | Cite as

“It’s Medically Proven!”: Assessing the Dissemination of Religion and Health Research

  • Steven M. Frenk
  • Steven L. Foy
  • Keith G. Meador
Original Paper


The recent proliferation of research on the connection between religion and health has raised concerns among some scholars about how these studies affect people’s understanding of that connection. However, such concerns assume that religion and health research reaches religious audiences and informs their understanding of the connection between religion and health. We explore the veracity of these assumptions, asking two questions: (1) Is religion and health research disseminating into the American public? (2) Do religious persons incorporate religion and health research into their understanding of the connection between religion and health? We conduct two studies to answer these questions. First, we search three newspapers (The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, and The Atlanta Journal-Constitution) and three news magazines (Newsweek, Time, and U. S. News and World Report) for articles that mention religion and health research. In the second study, we analyze interview transcripts for respondents’ mentions of religion and health research when discussing the relationship between religion and health. Our results indicate substantial growth over time in media reporting on religion and health research but reveal that only a limited portion of religious persons cite such research in explaining their conceptualizations of the connection between religion and health.


Content analysis Health Media Research Religion 



The authors would like to thank Joe Mann, Director of the Rural Church Division at The Duke Endowment, Mary Piepenbringin, Director of the Health Care Division at The Duke Endowment, and Gene Cochrane, President of The Duke Endowment for financial support of the Caring Communities Health Ministries Assessment from which these data are drawn. The authors would like to thank Alexis T. Franzese and Whitney Arroyave for their assistance with the Caring Communities Health Ministries Assessment Project and Wendy Cadge, Linda K. George, and Harold Koenig for reviewing the manuscript. Finally, the authors thank the congregations that participated in the study. The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not reflect the views or opinions of The Duke Endowment.


  1. Berg, B. L. (2003). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  2. Bjerklie, D. (2009). Keeping (or finding) the faith. Time, p. 84. February 23.Google Scholar
  3. Conrad, P., & Schneider, J. W. (1992). Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Company.Google Scholar
  4. Dannelly, B. (2004). Saved! DVD. MGM.Google Scholar
  5. Duenwald, M. (2002). Religion and health: New research revives old debate. New York Times, May 7, p. F5.Google Scholar
  6. Ellison, C. G., Barrett, J. B., & Moulton, B. E. (2008). Gender, marital status, and alcohol behavior: The neglected role of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47(4), 660–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frenk, S. M., George L. K., & Meador, K. G. (2009). A pilot study to assess the relationship between clergy and parish nurses. Unpublished manuscript. Durham, NC: Duke University Sociology Department.Google Scholar
  8. Gallagher, W. (2000). Turning from the workaday world to the spirit’s concerns. New York Times, February 16, p. H10.Google Scholar
  9. Galton, F. (1876). Statistical inquiries into the efficacy of prayer. In The Prayer Gauge Debate (pp. 85–106). Boston, MA: Congregational Publishing Society.Google Scholar
  10. Goldberg, S. (1999). Seduced by science: How American religion has lost its way. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Koenig, H. G., Idler, E., Kasl, S., Hays, J. C., George, L. K., Musick, M., Larson, D. B., Collins, T. R., & Benson, H. (1999). Religion, spirituality, and medicine: A rebuttal to skeptics. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 29(2), 123–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Handbook of religion and health. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2009). The state of the news media: An annual report on American journalism. Online report. Accessed July 24, 2009 ( = 9).
  14. Powell, L. H., Shahabi, L., & Thoresen, C. E. (2003). Religion and spirituality: Linkages to physical health. American Psychologist, 58(1), 36–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shuman, J. J., & Meador, K. G. (2003). Health thyself: Spirituality, medicine, and the distortion of Christianity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Sloan, R. P. (2006). Blind faith: The unholy alliance of religion and medicine. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  17. Steensland, B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M. D., Robinson, L. D., Wilcox, W. B., & Woodberry, R. D. (2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79(1), 291–318.Google Scholar
  18. Vaughan, D. (2006). NASA revised: Theory, analogy, and public sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 112(2), 353–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wallace, D. C., Tuck, I., Boland, C. S., & Witucki, J. M. (2002). Client perceptions of parish nursing. Public Health Nursing, 19(2), 128–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven M. Frenk
    • 1
  • Steven L. Foy
    • 1
  • Keith G. Meador
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Center for Spirituality, Theology, and HealthDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations