Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 950–963 | Cite as

Effects of Spiritual Well-Being on Subsequent Happiness, Psychological Well-Being, and Stress

Original Paper


Recently, Gomez and Fisher (Gomez R and Fisher JW (2003) Pers Individ Dif 35: 1975–1991) proposed that four facets of spiritual well-being exist, namely, personal, communal, environmental, and transcendental spiritual well-being. Based on data from three independent studies, the present research effort tested the validity of a German version of (Gomez R and Fisher JW (2003) Pers Individ Dif 35: 1975–1991) of the Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire (SWBQ-G). It was found that the SWBQ-G was factorially valid and that each of the four SWBQ-G scales was discriminant to mental, physical, and emotional well-being. Also, it was found that the SWBQ-G predicted levels of subsequent happiness, psychological well-being (positive relationship), and stress (negative relationship). These results add to our knowledge about the validity of the construct of spiritual well-being.


Spiritual well-being SWBQ Validity 


  1. Biddle, S. J. H., & Mutrie, N. (2008). Psychology of physical activity: Determinants, well-being, and interventions. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Boswell, G. H., Kahana, E., & Dilworth-Anderson, P. (2006). Spirituality and healthy lifestyle behaviors: Stress counter-balancing effects on the well-being of older adults. Journal of Religion & Health, 45, 587–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brähler, E., Mühlan, H., Albani, C., & Schmidt, S. (2008). Teststatistische prüfung und normierung der deutschen versionen des EUROHIS-QOL lebensqualität-Index und des WHO-5 wohlbefindens-index. Diagnostica, 53, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bufford, R. K., Paloutzian, R. E., & Ellison, C. W. (1991). Norms for the spiritual well-being scale. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19, 56–70.Google Scholar
  5. Bullinger, M., & Morfeld, M. (2004). The Short Form Health Survey SF-36/SF-12: Description and current trends. In C. Maurischat, M. Morfeld, T. Kohlmann, & M. Bullinger (Eds.), Lebensqualitaet: Nuetzlichkeit und psychometrie des health survey SF-36/SF-12 in der medizinischen rehabilitation. (Lengerich: Pabst.Google Scholar
  6. Cambridge University Press. (2008). Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, P., Cohen, J., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2002). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dulin, P. L. (2005). Social support as a moderator of the relationship between religious participation and psychological distress in a sample of community dwelling older adults. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 8, 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eid, M., & Larsen, R. J. (2008). The science of subjective well-being. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  11. Ellison, C. G., & Fan, D. (2008). Daily spiritual experiences and psychological well-being among US adults. Social Indicators Research, 88, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellison, C. W. (1983). Spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11, 330–340.Google Scholar
  13. Ellison, C. W., & Smith, J. (1991). Toward an integrative measure of health and well-being. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19, 35–48.Google Scholar
  14. Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science, 13, 172–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gomez, R., & Fisher, J. W. (2003). Domains of spiritual well-being and development and validation of the spiritual well-being questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1975–1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gomez, R., & Fisher, J. W. (2005a). Item response theory analysis of the spiritual well-being questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1107–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gomez, R., & Fisher, J. W. (2005b). The spiritual well-being questionnaire: Testing for model applicability, measurement and structural equivalencies, and latent mean differences across gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1383–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hackney, C. H., & Sanders, G. S. (2003). Religiosity and mental health: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hambleton, R. K. (2001). The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The oxford happiness questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1073–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larson, J. S. (1996). The World Health Organization’s definition of health: Social versus spiritual health. Social Indicators Research, 38, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lewis, C. A., Francis, L. J., & Ziebertz, H. G. (2002). The internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the German translation of the Oxford Happiness Inventory. North American Journal of Psychology, 4, 211–220.Google Scholar
  23. Maurischat, C., Herrschbach, P., Peters, A., & Bullinger, M. (2008). Factorial validity of the Short Form 12 (SF-12) in patients with diabetes mellitus. Psychology Science, 50, 7–20.Google Scholar
  24. Paloutzian, R. E., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being and the quality of life. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 224–237). New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
  25. Rutherford, L. (2008). The view through the medicine wheel: Shamanic maps of how the universe works. San Francisco: O Books.Google Scholar
  26. Sawatzky, R., Ratner, P. A., & Chiu, L. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between spirituality and quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 72, 153–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schlotz, W. & Schulz, P. (2006). The Short Trier inventory for chronic stress (TICS-S): Questionnaire, Scale description, and psychometric characteristics. Unpublished manuscript.University of Southampton, UK, and University of Trier, Germany.Google Scholar
  28. Schofield, M. J., & Mishra, G. (1998). Validity of the SF-12 compared with the SF-36 health survey in pilot studies of the Australian longitudinal study on women’s health. Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 259–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schultz, S. (2005). Newsweek/Beliefnet poll finds majority of Americans consider spirituality ‘very important’ in their daily lives (p. 11). New York: The Newsweek.Google Scholar
  30. Schulz, P., & Schlotz, W. (1999). Trierer Inventar zur Erfassung von chronischem stress: Skalenkonstruktion teststatistische Überprüfung und Validierung der Skala Arbeitsüberlastung [The Trier Inventory for the Assessment of Chronic Stress (TICS). Scale construction, statistical testing, and validation of the scale work overload]. Diagnostica, 45, 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shea, S., Skovlund, S., & Bech, P. (2003). Routine Assessment of Psychological Well-Being in People with Diabetes—Validation of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index in Six Countries. In 18th International Diabetes FederationCongress Paris.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, T. B., McCullough, M. E., & Poll, J. (2003). Religiousness and depression: Evidence for a main effect and the moderating influence of stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 614–636.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wallace, B. A., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). Mental balance and well-being. American Psychologist, 61, 690–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Warr, P. (1990). The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center of Continuing EducationTU Dortmund UniversityDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations