Advertisement

Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 164–178 | Cite as

Episcopal Measure of Faith Tradition: A Context-Specific Approach to Measuring Religiousness

  • Daniel E. Hall
  • Harold G. Koenig
  • Keith G. Meador
Original Paper

Abstract

Precise measurement of religiousness remains a vexing problem. In addition to relying almost exclusively on self-report, existing measures of religiousness pay little attention to the specific context of religious belief, and this may override distinctive norms of particular faith traditions and potentially confound the conclusions drawn from such research. To address these limitations, the authors describe a modified form of narrative content analysis that could eventually sort respondents into distinct theological traditions. A pilot test among Episcopalians demonstrates encouraging reliability (kappa 0.74, 95% LCI 0.47, P < 0.0002), and tests for convergent and discriminate validity suggest that the context of religious belief is both relevant and insufficiently assessed by the existing paradigm of religious measurements. If validated in a religiously diverse sample, this approach could be combined with existing, context-free measures of religiousness to generate more meaningful findings.

Keywords

Formation Status Religious Tradition Religious Attendance Faith Tradition Religious Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Scott Morin who assisted with the collection of this data as well as Stanley Hauerwas, Timothy Kimbrough, Cynthia Linkas, Charlotte Sullivan, Colin Williams, K. Alon White, three anonymous priests, and 23 anonymous subjects. This work would not be successful without their generous gifts of time and wisdom. We also thank the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the earlier drafts.

References

  1. Allport, G. (1950). The Individual and his religion: A psychological interpretation. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Baider, L., Holland, J. C., Russak, S. M., De-Nour, A. K. (2001). The system of belief inventory (SBI-15): A validation study in Israel. Psycho-Oncology, 10(6), 534–540.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, A. B. (2002). The importance of spirituality in well-being for Jews and Christians. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 825–838. doi: 10.1023/A:1020656823365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, A. B., Hall, D. E. (2009). Existential beliefs, social satisfaction, and well-being among Catholic, Jewish, and Protestant older adults. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 39–54.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, A. B., Hall, D. E., Koenig, H. G., & Meador, K. G. (2005a). Social versus individual motivation: Implications for normative definitions of religious motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1), 48–61. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, A. B., Keltner, D., & Rozin, P. (2005b). Different religions, different emotions. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(06), 734–735.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, A. B., Rozin, P., & Siegel, J. (2003). Faith versus practice: Different bases for religiosity judgments by Jews and Protestants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 287–295. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cramer, D. (1998). Fundamental statistics for social research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovic.Google Scholar
  10. Feinstein, A. R. (2002). Appraising the success of caring. In L. Cluff & R. Binstock (Eds.), The lost art of caring (pp. 201–218). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fetzer-Institute/NIA-Working Group. (1999). Multidemensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for use in Health Research. Kalamazoo: John E. Fetzer Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Frei, H. (1975). The identity of Jesus Christ: The hermeneutical bases of dogmatic theology. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
  13. Hall, T. W. (2002, August 23). Relational Spirituality: Implications of the Convergence of Attachment Theory, Interpersonal Neurobiology and Emotional Information Processing. Paper presented at the Paper Presented as the Margaret Gorman Early Career Award to Division 36 (Psychology of Religion) of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, D. E., Koenig, H. G., & Meador, K. G. (2004). Conceptualizing “religion”: How language shapes and constrains knowledge in the study of religion and health. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 47(3), 386–401. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2004.0050.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hatch, R. L., Burg, M. A., Naberhaus, D. S., & Hellmich, L. K. (1998). The spiritual involvement and beliefs scale: Development and testing of a new instrument. The Journal of Family Practice, 46(6), 476–486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hays, J. C., Meador, K. G., Branch, P. S., & George, L. K. (2001). The Spiritual History Scale in four dimensions (SHS-4): validity and reliability. The Gerontologist, 41(2), 239–249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hill, P. C., & Hood, R., Jr (Eds.). (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hill, P. C., & Pargament, K. I. (2003). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research. American Psychologist January, 58(1), 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holland, J. C., Kash, K. M., Passik, S., et al. (1998). A brief spiritual beliefs inventory for use in quality of life research in life-threatening illness. Psycho-Oncology, 7(6), 460–469.Google Scholar
  20. Idler, E. L., Musick, M. A., Ellison, C. G., George, L. K., Krause, N., Ory, M. G., et al. (2003). Measuring multiple dimensions of religion and spirituality for health research: Conceptual background and findings from the 1998 General Social Survey. Research on Aging, 25(4), 327–365. doi: 10.1177/0164027503025004001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jensen, L. A. (1998). Moral divisions within countries between orthodoxy and progressivism: India and the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(1), 90–107. doi: 10.2307/1388031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kark, J. D., Shemi, G., Friedlander, Y., Martin, O., Manor, O., & Blondheim, S. H. (1996). Does religious observance promote health? Mortality in secular vs religious kibbutzim in Israel. American Journal of Public Health, 86(3), 341–346. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.86.3.341.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. King, L. A. (2003). Measures and meaning: The use of qualitative data in social and personality psychology. In C. Sansone, C. C. Morf, & A. T. Panter (Eds.), The Sage handbook of methods in social psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. King, L. A., Scollon, C. K., Ramsey, C., & Williams, T. (2000). Stories of life transition: Subjective well-being and ego development in parents of children with Down Syndrome. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4), 509–536. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.2000.2285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirkpatrick, L., & Hood, R., Jr. (1990). Intrinsic–extrinsic religious orientation: The boon or bane of contemporary psychology of religion? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29(4), 442–462. doi: 10.2307/1387311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koenig, H., Parkerson, G. R., Jr, & Meador, K. G. (1997). Religion index for psychiatric research. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(6), 885–886.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Krause, N., Ellison, C. G., & Wulff, K. M. (1999). Church-based emotional support, negative interaction, and psychological well-being: Findings from a national sample of presbyterians. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(3), 725–741.Google Scholar
  28. Krause, N., Tarakeshwar, N., Ellison, C. G., & Wulff, K. M. (2001). Religious coping among the religious: The relationships between religious coping and well-being in a national sample of Presbyterian clergy, elders and members. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(3), 497–513. doi: 10.1111/0021-8294.00073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindbeck, G. (1984). The nature of doctrine: Religion and theology in a post liberal age. Philadelphia: Westminster.Google Scholar
  31. Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Qualitative research: Rigour and qualiltative research. British Medical Journal, 311, 109–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. (Eds.). (2000). Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  33. Moberg, D. (2002). Assessing and measuring spirituality: Confronting dilemmas of universal and particular evaluative criteria. Journal of Adult Development, 9(1), 47–60. doi: 10.1023/A:1013877201375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 49–58. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_06.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995). Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. British Medical Journal, 311, 42–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Princeton Religion Research Center. (1996). Religion in America. Princeton: The Gallup Poll.Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, M. (1987). Paul Tillich: Theologian of the boundaries. London: Collins Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
  38. Tillich, P. (1951–1963). Systematic Theology (3 Volumes). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). The daily spiritual experience scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 22–33. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_04.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wuthnow, R. (1993). Christianity in the twenty-first century: Reflections on the challenges ahead. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel E. Hall
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Harold G. Koenig
    • 1
  • Keith G. Meador
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Duke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  2. 2.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Duke Divinity SchoolDurhamUSA
  4. 4.Center for Health Equity Research and PromotionVA Pittsburgh Healthcare SystemPitttsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations