Advertisement

Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 571–579 | Cite as

Eve and the Serpent: A Rational Choice to Err

  • Sidney W. A. Dekker
Original Paper

Abstract

In dealing with inexplicable disaster, like the untimely death of a child in a hospital, we increasingly turn to the justice system for accountability and retribution. While seemingly sensible, criminalizing human error has a range of negative consequences. But it does offer “good” narratives of failure as the result of human fault—even at the cost of guilt. Such narratives allow us to pinpoint a cause: people made a rational choice to err and should be punished. This allows us to imagine ourselves in control over random, meaningless events. This paper traces Judeo–Christian roots of such regulative ideals in Western moral thinking, by examining the Genesis account of Eve and the Serpent, and St. Augustine’s interpretation of it.

Keywords

Human error Sin Eve Serpent 

References

  1. Armstrong, K. (1996). In the beginning: A new interpretation of genesis. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  2. Berlinger, N. (2005). After harm: Medical error and the ethics of forgiveness. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Cook, R. I., Render, M., & Woods, D. D. (2000). Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety. BMJ, 320, 791–794.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. GAIN (2004). Roadmap to a just culture: Enhancing the safety environment. Global Aviation Information Network (Group E: Flight Ops/ATC Ops Safety Information Sharing Working Group), p. 6.Google Scholar
  7. van den Hoven, M. J. (2001). Moral responsibility and information technology. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University Center for Philosophy of ICT, p. 3.Google Scholar
  8. Jensen, C. (1996). No downlink: A dramatic narrative about the challenger accident and our time. New York: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux, p. xiii.Google Scholar
  9. Kohn L. T., Corrigan J. M., & Donaldson M. (Eds.). (1999). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine.Google Scholar
  10. Laudan, L. (2006). Truth, error and criminal law: An essay in legal epistemology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 2.Google Scholar
  11. Pagels, E. (1988). Adam, Eve and the serpent. New York: Penguin Books, p. 145.Google Scholar
  12. Simmons L. W. (Ed.). (1942). Sun chief: The autobiography of a Hopi Indian. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. The Capital Times (2006, November 2). Elbow S. St. Mary’s nurse is charged with neglect: medication error led to teen’s death. Madison, WI: author.Google Scholar
  14. White, H. (1987). The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, p. 24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Blanton-Peale Institute 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TFHSLund UniversityLjungbyhedSweden

Personalised recommendations