Advertisement

A Cognitive-Behavioral Standpoint on the Perceived Consequences of a Major Seismic Event in Relation to Optimism and Pre-hazard Emotional Distress

  • Eugen Avram
  • Ioana R. Podina
  • Cezar Giosan
Article

Abstract

The study examined a circumscribed class of cognitions (i.e., dispositional optimism and perceived consequences) in connection to the emotional distress experienced in anticipation of a major seismic event (i.e., pre-hazard emotional distress). Grounded on cognitive-behavioral theory, it was argued that dispositional optimism exerts distal influence on distress, while the perceived consequences of a major seismic event are proximal to distress and, therefore, interpose the optimism-distress relationship. The hypothesis was tested via a cross-sectional study on a sample of 189 volunteers located in areas of high seismic hazard. Participants reported their level of pre-hazard emotional distress, their dispositional optimism, and their perceived consequences of a major seismic hazard. The results showed that there was a partial indirect effect from dispositional optimism to emotional distress via perceived consequences, indirect effect = −0.190, SE = 0.114, 95 % CI [−0.487; −0.021], k2 = 0.051. These findings could inform future prevention programs targeting emotional distress in anticipation of a natural hazard with impact on post-disaster recovery.

Keywords

Distress Seismic hazard Optimism Perceived consequences CBT 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS—UEFISCDI, project number PN II-RU-TE-2014-4-2481, contract number 293/01/10/2015, coordinated by Dr. Ioana R. Podina.

References

  1. Ardeleanu, L., Leydecker, G., Bonjer, K. P., Busche, H., Kaiser, D., & Schmitt, T. (2005). Probabilistic seismic hazard map for Romania as a basis for a new building code. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 5(5), 679–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armaş, I. (2006). Earthquake risk perception in Bucharest, Romania. Risk Analysis, 26(5), 1223–1234. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00810.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Armaş, I., & Avram, E. (2008). Patterns and trends in the perception of seismic risk. Case study: Bucharest Municipality/Romania. Natural Hazards, 44(1), 147–161. doi: 10.1007/s11069-007-9147-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, J. S. (1995). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond (1st ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., McCaul, K. D., & Weinstein, N. D. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26(2), 136. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carver, C. S., Pozo, C., Harris, S. D., Noriega, V., Scheier, M. F., Robinson, D. S., & Clark, K. C. (1993). How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: A study of women with early stage breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 375–390. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2014). Dispositional optimism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(6), 293–299. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Amsterdam: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy (Sub ed.). Secaucus, NJ: Citadel.Google Scholar
  10. Esperanza, L.-V., Luisa, M. M., Fabiola, F.-E., & Adriana, P. (2008). Volcanic risk exposure, feelings of insecurity, stress, and coping strategies in México. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(12), 2885–2902. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00417.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerrity, E. T., & Flynn, B. W. (1997). Mental health consequences of disasters. In E. K. Noji (Ed.), The public health consequences of disasters (pp. 101–121). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hayes, A. F. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper].Google Scholar
  13. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Iacoviello, B. M., & Charney, D. S. (2014). Psychosocial facets of resilience: Implications for preventing posttrauma psychopathology, treating trauma survivors, and enhancing community resilience. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5, 2–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., & Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007). Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), 53–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindell, M. K., Prater, C. S., & Perry, R. W. (2006). Fundamentals of emergency management. Emmitsburg, MD: Federal Emergency Management Agency Emergency Management Institute. http://www.training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/fem.asp.
  18. Lowe, S. R., Chan, C. S., & Rhodes, J. E. (2010). Pre-hurricane perceived social support protects against psychological distress: A longitudinal analysis of low-income mothers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(4), 551–560. doi: 10.1037/a0018317.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 593–614. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Mogoaşe, C., Podina, I., Sucală, M., & Dobrean, A. (2013). Evaluating the unique contribution of irrational beliefs and negative interpretations in predicting child anxiety. Implications for cognitive bias modification interventions. Journal of Evidence Based Psychotherapies, 8(2a), 465.Google Scholar
  21. Norris, F. H., Friedman, M. J., Watson, P. J., Byrne, C. M., Diaz, E., & Kaniasty, K. (2002). 60,000 disaster victims speak: Part I. An empirical review of the empirical literature, 1981—2001. Psychiatry, 65(3), 207–239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Opris, D., & Macavei, B. (2007). The profile of emotional distress; Norms for the Romanian population. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 7(2), 139–158.Google Scholar
  23. Perry, R. W., & Lindell, M. K. (1978). The psychological consequences of natural disaster: A review of research on American communities. Mass Emergencies, 3(2–3), 105–115.Google Scholar
  24. Podina, A. V., & Vîslă, P. (2014). Being socially anxious is not enough: Response expectancy mediates the effect of social anxiety on state anxiety in response to a social evaluative threat. Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies, 14(1), 85–94.Google Scholar
  25. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93–115. doi: 10.1037/a0022658.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rauch, S. A., Defever, E., Oetting, S., Graham-Bermann, S. A., & Seng, J. S. (2013). Optimism, coping, and posttraumatic stress severity in women in the childbearing year. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 5(1), 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Skolarus, L. E., Lisabeth, L. D., Sanchez, B. N., Smith, M. A., Garcia, N. M., Risser, J. M. H., & Morgenstern, L. B. (2012). The prevalence of spirituality, optimism, depression, and fatalism in a Bi-ethnic stroke population. Journal of Religion and Health, 51(4), 1293–1305. doi: 10.1007/s10943-010-9438-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tobin, G. A. (1997). Natural hazards: Explanation and integration. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Turner, R. H., Nigg, J. M., & Paz, D. H. (1986). Waiting for disaster: Earthquake watch in California. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Vîslă, A., Grosse Holtforth, M., & David, D. (2015). Descriptive/inferential cognitive processes and evaluative cognitive processes: Relationships among each other and with emotional distress. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 33(2), 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10942-015-0207-x.Google Scholar
  34. Weems, C. F., Pina, A. A., Costa, N. M., Watts, S. E., Taylor, L. K., & Cannon, M. F. (2007). Predisaster trait anxiety and negative affect predict posttraumatic stress in youths after hurricane Katrina. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(1), 154–159. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.1.154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Whitney, D. J., Lindell, M. K., & Nguyen, H. H. D. (2004). Earthquake beliefs and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments. Risk Analysis, 24(1), 87–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zuckerman, M. (1999). Diathesis-stress models. Vulnerability to psychopathology: A biosocial model (pp. 3–23). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Psychology and PsychotherapyBabeş-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations