Skip to main content
Log in

Pondering Products of Place-Level Distances: A Reply to Reinhart

  • Reply to Comment
  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Baumer E, Gustafson R (2007) Social organization and instrumental crime: assessing the empirical validity of classic and contemporary anomie theories. Criminology 45(3):617–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox J (2016) Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. Sage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek E, Jackson J (1977) Statistical methods for social scientists. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart A (2016) Response to “crime places in context.” J Quant Criminol. doi:10.1007/s10940-016-9299-4

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rustu Deryol.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deryol, R., Wooldredge, J., Wilcox, P. et al. Pondering Products of Place-Level Distances: A Reply to Reinhart. J Quant Criminol 32, 725–735 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9300-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9300-2

Keywords

Navigation