Human mentation involves multiple formats of thought, which are connected substantially but partially, and may operate within or outside of awareness. The modes of thought include symbolic processes which are discrete representations with properties of reference and generativity, and which may be images or words, and subsymbolic components which are continuous in format and based on analogic relationships. The organization of experience is based on memory schemas, including emotion schemas organized through episodes that involve related sensory and bodily experiences with particular people in particular contexts. The referential process is a set of bidirectional functions that enable connection between the subsymbolic components operating in multiple sensory channels and the discrete single channel verbal code. The process involves three major functions: Arousal, the activation of an emotion schema not yet in symbolic form; Symbolizing, describing an event in which the schema has been activated; and Reflection/Reorganizing, exploring and elaborating the emotional meaning of such an event. The concepts of the theory concern psychological aspects of thought, but are potentially mappable onto the underlying neural structure.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
J. M. Barrie. Kindle Edition.
The term symbolic is used in multiple code theory as referring to a particular process of thought rather than in the semiotic context of signs, symbols and signification, or as involving fixed referents as in psychoanalytic theory.
The term ‘subsymbolic was initially used by Bucci (1997) as associated with the PDP model, and has remained associated with the multiple code theory. The prefix ‘sub’ is not intended to characterize the process as less developed or less dominant than symbolic forms.
McPhee (2013), Draft No. 4. The New Yorker, April 29.
Taken from wine descriptions posted by Eddy Le Garrec of the Empire State of Wine.
The same process may be identified in arousal and exploration of any memory schema, in solving a scientific problem, or trying understand any past and present event; we focus here on verbalization of emotion schemas, dominated by the affective core.
Excerpts are taken from Steinbeck, John. East of Eden Penguin Books. Kindle Edition.
Austen, J. (1952). (1813) Pride and Prejudice. London: HarperCollins.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bock, K., Loebell, H., & Morey, R. (1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99(1), 150–171.
Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325–337.
Bruner, J. S., et al. (1966). On cognitive growth. In J. S. Bruner (Ed.), Studies in cognitive growth (pp. 12–15). New York: Wiley.
Bucci, W. (1985). Dual coding: A cognitive model for psychoanalytic research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 33, 571–607.
Bucci, W. (1997). Psychoanalysis and cognitive science: A multiple code theory. NY: Guilford Press.
Bucci, W., & Freedman, N. (1978). Language and hand: The dimension of referential competence. Journal of Personality, 46, 594–622.
Bucci, W., Maskit, B., & Murphy, S. (2016). Connecting emotions and words: The referential process. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-015-9417-z,15(3),359-383.
Chin, S. T., Eyres, G. T., & Marriott, P. J. (2011). Identification of potent odourants in wine and brewed coffee using gas chromatography-olfactometry and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A, 1218, 7487–7498.
Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Hadamard, J. (1996). The mathematician’s mind: The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
James, W. (1893). The principles of psychology: (Vol. I). New York: Holt.
McPhee, J. (2013), Draft No. 4. The New Yorker, April 29. [Google Scholar]
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegen Paul.
Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L., & the PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? and how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4), 695–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018405058216.
Steinbeck, J. (1952). East of Eden. Penguin Group (USA) LLC: Kindle Edition.
Tolstoy, L. (2000) Anna Karenina. In: R. Pevear & L. Volokhonsky, Trans.(Eds.) New York: Penguin Books (Original work published 1878)
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.
Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1984). Symbol formation. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Bucci, W. Overview of the Referential Process: The Operation of Language Within and Between People. J Psycholinguist Res (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09759-2
- Emotion schemas
- Referential process