Abstract
With the development of ICT, digital writing is becoming much more common in people’s life. Differently from keyboarding alphabets directly to input English words, keyboarding Chinese character is always through typing phonetic alphabets and then identify the glyph provided by Pinyin input-method software while in this process which do not need users to produce orthography spelling, thus it is different from traditional written language production model based on handwriting process. Much of the research in this domain has found that using Pinyin input method is beneficial to Chinese characters recognition, but only a small part explored the effects of individual’s Pinyin input experience on the Chinese characters production process. We ask whether using Pinyin input-method will strengthen the semantic-phonology linkage or semantic-orthography linkage in Chinese character mental lexicon. Through recording the RT and accuracy of participants completing semantic-syllable and semantic-glyph consistency judgments, the results found the accuracy of semantic-syllable consistency judgments in high Pinyin input experienced group was higher than that in low-experienced group, and RT was reversed. There were no significant differences on semantic-glyph consistency judgments between the two groups. We conclude that using Pinyin input method in Chinese digital writing can strengthen the semantic-phonology linkage while do not weakening the semantic-orthography linkage in mental lexicon at the same time, which means that Pinyin input method is beneficial to lexical processing involving Chinese cognition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristei, S., Melinger, A., & Rahman, R. A. (2011). Electrophysiological chronometry of semantic context effects in language production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(7), 1567–1586.
Betsy, S., Jenny, L., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778.
Bonin, P., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. (2001). Do phonological codes constrain the selection of orthographic codes in written picture naming? Journal of Memory and Language, 45(4), 688–720.
Chen, J. J. (2015). The influence of digital language experience on word cognition in adolescent students (in Chinese). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.
Merchant, G. (2008). Digital writing in the early years. Handbook of research on new literacies, 751-774. Retrived from http://extra.shu.ac.uk/bvw/MerchantfinalSept06.doc.
Ouellette, G., & Tims, T. (2014). The write way to spell: Printing versus typing effects on orthographic learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 117. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00117.
Qian, H., & Feng, C. Z. (2004). The influence of typewriting on the processing of Chinese characters. Psychological Science, 27(6), 1368–1370. (in Chinese).
Segaert, K., Menenti, L., Weber, K., Petersson, K. M., & Hagoort, P. (2012). Shared syntax in language production and language comprehension—An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 22(7), 1662–1670.
Tan, L. H., Xu, M., Chang, C. Q., & Siok, W. T. (2013). China’s language input system in the digital age affects children’s reading development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(3), 1119–1123.
Weekes, B. S., Yin, W., Su, I. F., & Chen, M. J. (2006). The cognitive neuropsychology of reading and writing in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 7(3), 595–617.
Zhang, J. J., & Li, M. (2010). The effects of Chinese input methods on the links among the orthography, phonology and meaning of Chinese characters (in Chinese). Psychological Science, 33(4), 835–838.
Zhang, Q. F., & Yang, Y. F. (2003). The determiners of picture–naming latency. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35(4), 447–454. (in Chinese).
Zhu, Z. X., Liu, L., Ding, G. S., & Peng, D. L. (2009). The influence of Pinyin typewriting experience on orthographic and phonological processing of Chinese characters (in Chinese). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41(9), 785–792.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This study was funded by MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanity and Social Science (grant number 16YJCZH067) and Education Science “11th Five-Year” planning project of Hunan Province of China (grant number XJK011BGD005).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Pictures
Appendix 2: Disturbance terms of glyphs and sounds
Appendix 3: Priming characters in idioms and their disturbance terms of glyphs and sounds
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Luo, R. & Liu, H. The Effect of Pinyin Input Experience on the Link Between Semantic and Phonology of Chinese Character in Digital Writing. J Psycholinguist Res 46, 923–934 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9470-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9470-y