Reading Comprehension Mediates the Relationship between Syntactic Awareness and Writing Composition in Children: A Longitudinal Study
- 651 Downloads
This research aimed to explore the relation between syntactic awareness and writing composition in 129 Hong Kong Chinese children. These children were from a ten-year longitudinal project. At each year, a number of measures were administered. The 129 children’s data of nonverbal reasoning at age 4, phonological awareness, morphological awareness, vocabulary knowledge at age 8, reading comprehension at age 12 and syntactic awareness and writing composition skills at ages 11 and 12 were included in this study. Syntactic awareness was longitudinally and uniquely predictive of Chinese children’s writing composition, and children’s performance in early writing composition was uniquely associated with their later syntactic skills, even when controlling for the contributions from age, nonverbal and verbal abilities, phonological awareness, and morphological awareness. The relationship between syntactic awareness and writing composition was mediated by children’s performance in reading comprehension. These findings may suggest a reciprocal relation between syntactic awareness and writing composition, and this association may vary with ability in reading comprehension in Chinese children.
KeywordsSyntactic awareness Writing composition Reciprocal relationship Reading comprehension Mediation effect
We thank all research assistant, children and parents for their participation. This research was supported by the General Research Fund of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Research Grants Council (Project reference #451210) and Collaborative Research Fund (CUHK: 2300035) to Catherine McBride.
- Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 39–56. doi: 10.1177/002221940203500104.
- Britton, J. (1975). The development of writing abilities (11–18). London: Macmillan. (p. 39).Google Scholar
- Calkins, L. M. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Heinemann Educational Books Inc., 70 Court St., Portsmouth, NH 03801.Google Scholar
- Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. New York, London, Chicago: Harvester-Wheatsheaf, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Goodman, K., & Goodman, Y. (1983). Reading and writing relationships: Pragmatic functions. Language Arts, 60(5), 590–599.Google Scholar
- Guan, C. Q., Ye, F., Wagner, R. K., Leong, C. K., & Meng, W.-J. (2014). Reading mediates the roles of morphological awareness, syntactic processing, and working memory in accounting for individual differences in Chinese written composition. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi: 10.1037/a0035984
- Harris, R. J. (1962). An experimental inquiry into the functions and value of formal grammar in the teaching of English with special reference to the teaching of correct written English to children aged 12 to 14 (Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Education (University of London)).Google Scholar
- Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hu, Y. S. (1979). Modern Chinese. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Google Scholar
- Hunt, K. W. (1970). Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the society for research in child development, iii-67.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, J. R., Johnson, E., & Hileman, J. (2004). When is reading also writing: Sources of individual differences on the new reading performance assessments. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(2), 125–151. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0802_2.
- Lin, Y.-A. (2006). Against the deficit in computational grammatical complexity hypothesis: A corpus-based study. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 32(2), 59–70.Google Scholar
- Raven, J., Court, J., & Raven, C. J. (1995). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 2: Coloured progressive matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Tunmer, W.E., & Hoover, W.A. (1992). Cognitive and linguistic factors in learning to read. In P.G. Gough, L.C. Ehri, & M.R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 175–213). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Weaver, C. (1996). Teaching grammar in context. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar