Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 45, Issue 6, pp 1265–1285 | Cite as

Reading Comprehension Mediates the Relationship between Syntactic Awareness and Writing Composition in Children: A Longitudinal Study



This research aimed to explore the relation between syntactic awareness and writing composition in 129 Hong Kong Chinese children. These children were from a ten-year longitudinal project. At each year, a number of measures were administered. The 129 children’s data of nonverbal reasoning at age 4, phonological awareness, morphological awareness, vocabulary knowledge at age 8, reading comprehension at age 12 and syntactic awareness and writing composition skills at ages 11 and 12 were included in this study. Syntactic awareness was longitudinally and uniquely predictive of Chinese children’s writing composition, and children’s performance in early writing composition was uniquely associated with their later syntactic skills, even when controlling for the contributions from age, nonverbal and verbal abilities, phonological awareness, and morphological awareness. The relationship between syntactic awareness and writing composition was mediated by children’s performance in reading comprehension. These findings may suggest a reciprocal relation between syntactic awareness and writing composition, and this association may vary with ability in reading comprehension in Chinese children.


Syntactic awareness Writing composition Reciprocal relationship Reading comprehension Mediation effect 



We thank all research assistant, children and parents for their participation. This research was supported by the General Research Fund of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Research Grants Council (Project reference #451210) and Collaborative Research Fund (CUHK: 2300035) to Catherine McBride.


  1. Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, Y., Wagner, R. K., & Lopez, D. (2014). Developmental relations between reading and writing at the word, sentence, and text levels: A latent change score analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 419.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, R., Torgerson, C., Beverton, S., Allison, F., Locke, T., Low, G., et al. (2006). The effect of grammar teaching on writing development. British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 39–55. doi: 10.2307/30032657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beers, S., & Nagy, W. (2009). Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre? Reading and Writing, 22(2), 185–200. doi: 10.1007/s11145-007-9107-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 39–56. doi: 10.1177/002221940203500104.
  6. Berninger, V. W., Cartwright, A. C., Yates, C. M., Swanson, H. L., & Abbott, R. D. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades. Reading and Writing, 6(2), 161–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berninger, V. W., Mizokawa, D. T., & Bragg, R. (1991). Scientific practitioner: Theory-based diagnosis and remediation of writing disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 29(1), 57–79. doi: 10.1016/0022-4405(91)90016-K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Britton, J. (1975). The development of writing abilities (11–18). London: Macmillan. (p. 39).Google Scholar
  9. Calkins, L. M. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Heinemann Educational Books Inc., 70 Court St., Portsmouth, NH 03801.Google Scholar
  10. DiStefano, P., & Killion, J. (1984). Assessing writing skills through a process approach. English Education, 16(4), 203–207. doi: 10.2307/40172531.Google Scholar
  11. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. doi: 10.2307/356600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. New York, London, Chicago: Harvester-Wheatsheaf, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Goodman, K., & Goodman, Y. (1983). Reading and writing relationships: Pragmatic functions. Language Arts, 60(5), 590–599.Google Scholar
  15. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guan, C. Q., Ye, F., Wagner, R. K., Leong, C. K., & Meng, W.-J. (2014). Reading mediates the roles of morphological awareness, syntactic processing, and working memory in accounting for individual differences in Chinese written composition. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi: 10.1037/a0035984
  17. Harris, R. J. (1962). An experimental inquiry into the functions and value of formal grammar in the teaching of English with special reference to the teaching of correct written English to children aged 12 to 14 (Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Education (University of London)).Google Scholar
  18. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Hu, Y. S. (1979). Modern Chinese. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hunt, K. W. (1970). Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the society for research in child development, iii-67.Google Scholar
  21. Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45(3), 337–374. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00500-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jenkins, J. R., Johnson, E., & Hileman, J. (2004). When is reading also writing: Sources of individual differences on the new reading performance assessments. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(2), 125–151. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0802_2.
  23. Layton, A., Robinson, J., & Lawson, M. (1998). The relationship between syntactic awareness and reading performance. Journal of Research in Reading, 21(1), 5–23. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.00039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leong, C., & Ho, M. (2008). The role of lexical knowledge and related linguistic components in typical and poor language comprehenders of Chinese. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 559–586. doi: 10.1007/s11145-007-9113-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li, H., & Hamel, C. M. (2003). Writing issues in college students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the literature from 1990 to 2000. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(1), 29–46. doi: 10.2307/1593683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin, Y.-A. (2006). Against the deficit in computational grammatical complexity hypothesis: A corpus-based study. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 32(2), 59–70.Google Scholar
  27. Marion, C. (1980). Syntactic complexity and teachers’ quality ratings of narrations and arguments. Research in the Teaching of English, 14(3), 223–231. doi: 10.2307/40170857.Google Scholar
  28. McBride-Chang, C., Bialystok, E., Chong, K. K. Y., & Li, Y. (2004). Levels of phonological awareness in three cultures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89(2), 93–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.05.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., Zhou, A., Wat, C. P., & Wagner, R. K. (2003). Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children’s Chinese character recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McBride-Chang, C., Tardif, T., Cho, J.-R., Shu, H. U. A., Fletcher, P., Stokes, S. F., et al. (2008). What’s in a word? Morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge in three languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(03), 437–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, B., & McCardle, P. (2011). Reflections on the need for continued research on writing. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 121–132. doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9267-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raven, J., Court, J., & Raven, C. J. (1995). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 2: Coloured progressive matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  33. Saddler, B., & Graham, S. (2005). The effects of peer-assisted sentence-combining instruction on the writing performance of more and less skilled young writers. Journal of educational psychology, 97(1), 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saddler, B., Behforooz, B., & Asaro, K. (2008). The effects of sentence-combining instruction on the writing of fourth-grade students with writing difficulties. The Journal of Special Education, 42(2), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shanahan, T., & Lomax, R. G. (1986). An analysis and comparison of theoretical models of the reading-writing relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tong, X., & McBride-Chang, C. (2010). Chinese-English biscriptal reading: Cognitive component skills across orthographies. Reading and Writing, 23(3–4), 293–310. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9211-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tong, X., Deacon, S. H., & Cain, K. (2014). Morphological and syntactic awareness in poor comprehenders another piece of the puzzle. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 22–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tong, X., Tong, X., Shu, H., Chan, S., & McBride-Chang, C. (2014). Discourse-level reading comprehension in Chinese children: What is the role of syntactic awareness? Journal of Research in Reading, 37(S1), S48–S70. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tunmer, W.E., & Hoover, W.A. (1992). Cognitive and linguistic factors in learning to read. In P.G. Gough, L.C. Ehri, & M.R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 175–213). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  40. Weaver, C. (1996). Teaching grammar in context. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  41. Yan, C., McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R., Zhang, J., Wong, A. Y., & Shu, H. (2012). Writing quality in Chinese children: Speed and fluency matter. Reading and Writing, 25(7), 1499–1521. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9330-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Yeung, P.-S., Ho, C.-H., Chan, D.-O., & Chung, K.-H. (2013). Modeling the relationships between cognitive-linguistic skills and writing in Chinese among elementary grades students. Reading and Writing, 26(7), 1195–1221. doi: 10.1007/s11145-012-9411-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong

Personalised recommendations